Captains Round 2 Captain/Vice Captain

[toxic]

You didn't specify the loction of the specific mobile tower incuding the signal frequency, or any information regarding handovers between adjacent cells nor the list of every router that routed your TCP/IP packets from your phone over the internet to the bigfooty server. Thusly, do we really know where you sent your comment from?

You lost me at


loction

 

[TheOz]

You lost me at


loction

lol, it is kinda technical I know

 

[Test Tickle]

GAJ will score higher, always take the GAJ

Yep Yep totally agree 100%

Sent from my laptop beside my chair in front of the TV

 

[Mullarkey]

You didn't specify the loction of the specific mobile tower incuding the signal frequency, or any information regarding handovers between adjacent cells nor the list of every router that routed your TCP/IP packets from your phone over the internet to the bigfooty server. Thusly, do we really know where you sent your comment from?

Interwebs, duh

 

[Daniels]

Another vote for

Watson VC Ablett C

 

[GOAUS!]

So Watson's 113 not good enough, Ablett then I take it?

 

[stevebbb]

So Watson's 113 not good enough, Ablett then I take it?

yep I'll be giving it to Gaz

 

[Chronz]

So Watson's 113 not good enough, Ablett then I take it?

Gaz for me too. But weighing up my options with Pendles and Beams also in the mix

 

[Judd_Magic]

Had Watson as VC but not good enough.

Gazza to save my teams sorry arse with the big C on him.

 

[Kadog]

So Watson's 113 not good enough, Ablett then I take it?

yep I'll be giving it to Gaz

Gaz for me too. But weighing up my options with Pendles and Beams also in the mix

Had Watson as VC but not good enough.

Gazza to save my teams sorry arse with the big C on him.

+5

 

[karaoke]

Well big Ruff, your 49 pts aint quite cutting the mustard for me to choose your score for my VC loophole,

GAJ it is then,

+6

 

[Chism]

Anyone thinking of giving the C to Dangerfield instead of Gaz?? Watson let me down as VC so now i have to make a call!!

Showdown and he lifts for these games against Port. I am worried about Gazza getting the Crowley treatment and a score around 110.

Decisions , decisions.

 

[GOAUS!]

Anyone thinking of giving the C to Dangerfield instead of Gaz?? Watson let me down as VC so now i have to make a call!!

Showdown and he lifts for these games against Port. I am worried about Gazza getting the Crowley treatment and a score around 110.

Decisions , decisions.

GAJ has quite a good record against Freo IIRC.

 

[Chism]

GAJ has quite a good record against Freo IIRC.

Agree and he averages 130 odd but i just have a funny feeling for some reason Danger will out score him.

 

[BORK]

Really want to not have Ablett C but there is too much risk in doing so. Do not have Pendles but would have been prepared to back him in this week. It is like playing against the house in the casino.

 

[toxic]

If I had Stevie J i'd take him as captain, sadly i dont have him

 

[bergerson33]

I'm 568/7 so far (Thank you Roughead, Simpson and Langford for a combined 154 points)
So I'm tempted to roll the dice to make up some points on Sandi C against a young GC and hope Ablett has a sub par game. Could and probably will put me further behind the 8 ball. Will more than likely chicken out though.

 

[hoddo]

Not taking Watson's 113 and I'm going with Sandi too. He should get a massive score at home against the GC rucks.

 

[Mattrox]

Not taking Watson's 113 and I'm going with Sandi too. He should get a massive score at home against the GC rucks.

Explain to me why you are selecting an injury prone player as captain. You'll be spewing if he injures himself in the opening ruck tap for 1pt.

Sent from my GT-I9295 using Tapatalk

 

[hoddo]

Explain to me why you are selecting an injury prone player as captain. You'll be spewing if he injures himself in the opening ruck tap for 1pt.

Sent from my GT-I9295 using Tapatalk

Yes I will and that's certainly something I've considered. In fact my post originally included a mention of that possibility but I deleted it in case people thought I was jinxing him
I would certainly be happier making him VC but the draw didn't allow that. I believe it's worth the small risk that he may be injured early considering he's a similar "immovable object" type of ruckman to Cox who has averaged 150 against GC and my planned perma-captain (Beams) is playing Sydney who are masters at shutting top players down.

 

[GOAUS!]

Yes I will and that's certainly something I've considered. In fact my post originally included a mention of that possibility but I deleted it in case people thought I was jinxing him
I would certainly be happier making him VC but the draw didn't allow that. I believe it's worth the small risk that he may be injured early considering he's a similar "immovable object" type of ruckman to Cox who has averaged 150 against GC and my planned perma-captain (Beams) is playing Sydney who are masters at shutting top players down.

Sydney will be looking to shut down Pendles ahead of Beams I would think. Dangerous going against GAJ, good luck.

 

[hoddo]

Sydney will be looking to shut down Pendles ahead of Beams I would think. Dangerous going against GAJ, good luck.

Can't really include GAj when I don't have him in my team. I've already posted several times that I believe Beams will move past him this year.

 

[exit]

Just took the C off Ablett and gave it to Danger. Sandi , Beams and Pendles came into calculations as well but just got a feeling that Dangerfield will have a big one today, and Freo/Crowley might be able to curtail Ablett's effect to some degree. Will probably add to my list of regrets, but gotta go with my gut feel.

 

[toxic]

the pain of not making Nroo Vice Captain ....might require drinks and trades

Judd_Magic you in?

 

[Big Sauce 21]

I always make Gazza captain, so much more safer.

I'll be doing N.Reiwoldt VC Gazza C

Liking this. Just need laidler not to play