These threads are pointless nowadays imo
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Although it wouldn't be good for my team with Swan but how good would it be if Ablett got a new role that reduced his scoring and Swan stopped giving a crap and his scoring went down to normal premium scoring. It would be so much more interesting having to choose between Watson, Cotchin, Boyd, Beams etc rather than the lock it in captains we have now.
Haha well perhaps stupidly I find myself already in this position as I currently dont own either of the big 2....my options arent great this week tbh....If I go ahead with my current trades its really between Stanton, Pendles, Gibbs, Cox and Rockliff as a real smoky for me. Leaning toward one of the first two even though their records arent great against their respective opponents.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
anyone going the pendlebury for 150 on his 150th?
swan C , gibbs VC
Oh god. Don't remind me of that match. I, like a lot of others, put the C on Goddard, what a nightmare.I have Swan and I vowed to make him my perma-captain all year, but Jobe Watson is tempting me against Melbourne, especially with a tag likely to go to Goddard like they did last year against the Saints
This isnt SC or Eliteso is Cotchin's 121 worth keeping? (VC)
Well how else do you propose you execute the loophole in a full lockout?is there no Captains loophole in DT?
is there no Captains loophole in DT?
aaaah, as you can see, my main focus is Supercoach this year!
Lucky I left the C on Yablett...
Cheers![]()