Round 2 Discussion Thread

[PP34]

CD clearly has a hard on for Nankervis. Both games I've watched he's done a bit around the ground but Kreuzer and Grundy much more effective.

Joke.

Also from the looks of stats, if I'm reading right Treloar had 6 clangers? Kind of justifies his score if that's the case. He's annoying me so far, clearly shouldn't have doubted Pendles.

 

[Seymour Skinner]

Gawn for C, rucking against Kreuzer and the Carlton circus

IIRC Gawn isn't his usually studself when he goes up against the big Kreuuuuze. Highest is only 111.
Kreuz isn't a terrible ruckman, pretty handy imo, he's just dead most of the time.

 

[markm106]

3/294 had vc on Treloar. think I'll captain Danger.

 

[Spacedog]

I was totally off Nank, paying 366k for someone who played 12 games sounded ridiculous. He was pantsed by Grundy in the JLT but 20 more points on him. And his JLT average was 111 or something and I needed ruck cover... Kinda lucky I picked him since I was telling people not to!

Nank dog is basically a midfielder. Is shithosue at hitouts but he can take big clunks and picks it up around the ground.

 

[big_bazza]

Ok Ok Treloar's tugging my nuts like Dylan 'BabyBackBitch' Shiel was last year, plenty of the ball but this score is farked (yes they might have the odd shank but) suck me sideways this scoring is an absolute ****ing outrage.

 

[Josh_Hudo]

4/432 with Grundy, Treloar, Nank and Butler

 

[Spacedog]

Take pendles 120 or risk it on danger... hr did get that 221 against norf

 

[Spacedog]

Ok Ok Treloar's tugging my nuts like Dylan 'BabyBackBitch' Shiel was last year, plenty of the ball but this score is farked (yes they might have the odd shank but) suck me sideways this scoring is an absolute ******* outrage.

Yeah 2 goals 35 disposals for 108 is shite. if he gets 30 and no goals the campaigners gonna score 60

 

[Seymour Skinner]

Nank dog is basically a midfielder. Is shithosue at hitouts but he can take big clunks and picks it up around the ground.

His hitouts are criiiiisp. He just doesn't get a stack of them against the better ruckmen.

CD love him and he will get some even more ludicrous scores during the year when he rucks against legitimate shittrucks.

 

[peppy la pew]

3 for 352, Nank, WHE and Treloar

Can't complain given what they cost, and the fact Treloar was robbed

 

[Unique Name]

5/506
Nank the Tank
Pendles
Treloar
Howe
Butler

On Nank though, 5mins before Rnd 1 opening bounce I panicked that Nank was too risky so swapped him for Roughy. Contemplated all week, 5min before bounce I did a corrective trade and swapped Roughy out for the Nank. Such a waste of a trade.... but happy with Nank's score none the less.

 

[Sir Hugh Percy]

3/343 - Nank, Adams and Treloar in descending order of getting warmly fondled by CD. I'm sick of this shit. I'm out!

 

[Jiska]

What did Dusty end up getting?

I'm thinking of getting him for Treloar this week.

Hahahahhahahahaha. Eclipsed TheOz for post of the night..

 

[Island Bomber]

4/450 Adams, Pendles, WHE and Rance. Good start to the week that will only last until tomorrow when my crap rookies score 30's and 40's.

 

[Spacedog]

His hitouts are criiiiisp. He just doesn't get a stack of them against the better ruckmen.

CD love him and he will get some even more ludicrous scores during the year when he rucks against legitimate shittrucks.

Hopefully that happens next week against vardy/giles

 

[Verdun66]

526/5 Treloar and Dusty seemed to be in the 60's forever and soared to tons. Nank and Adams tonned up, and Butler 65 my only down, but he'll make money.

 

[Seymour Skinner]

5/506
Nank the Tank
Pendles
Treloar
Howe
Butler

On Nank though, 5mins before Rnd 1 opening bounce I panicked that Nank was too risky so swapped him for Roughy. Contemplated all week, 5min before bounce I did a corrective trade and swapped Roughy out for the Nank. Such a waste of a trade.... but happy with Nank's score none the less.

Have had the same 5 so far, happy days.

 

[Listclogger]

4/408. Solid enough but looks like plenty have had good starts

 

[Raveneyes]

4/472

Pendlebury (VC)
Treloar
WHE
Nank

Satisfying start, though I won't be taking Pendles as (C).
Deciding on either:
- Danger vs Norf
- Gawn vs Carltank

Will look at getting Buttplug in next week.

Oh and what a shit game. Turnover after turnover from both teams and we were the worst culprits.
We'll get pantsed by the Swans next week.

Hahahahhahahahaha. Eclipsed TheOz for post of the night..

Oh what did I miss?

 

[Migzeh]

Ha ha

Heart muscle. Used all his heart last week

My new favourite term is 'hes done a heartlidge'

Especially in reference to people who don't attack the pin on the golf course.

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

 

[qarocks]

I wonder what the ratio of people with Danger + Selwood to Pendles + Treloar is?

 

[Obese Arachnid]

Fasolo was playing??

Yes he was, unfortunately he was playing downhill skier.

 

[TBellicious]

Does SuperCoach have a vendetta against treloar

 

[peppy la pew]

Yes he was, unfortunately he was playing downhill skier.

When he intercepted that mark in front of his own player, dropped it, then gathered it back and got tackled HTB

Pretty much summed up his night

 

[Obese Arachnid]

Dunno if it counts, but probably went side/back another 6 times.

I'm a sicko, when I skim posts, one thing always stops me in my tracks.

I always pause on your sig, for some reason the word masturbating always catches my eye.