11kgm
Premium Platinum
- Sep 24, 2014
- 21,974
- 20,167
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Man Utd
Taranto maybe to Whitfield
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
I'm bringing Marshall in this week and Whitfield next week.This has been my dilemma all week ......it's sending me loopy ....no I'm talking a different Macrae though
Bring Finn Macrae in and get Whitfield ......only $157K in the bank
Bring Comben in as a DPP loop and get Whitfield ......$211K in the bank
Macrea generates some $$$ .....Comben unlikely to play
$211K in bank gives me multiple options to bring in Marshall next week ......flexibility
$157K in bank reduces my option to one player to bring in Marshall ....but what if that player (reeves) has a good week ??? ..... .....prefer Madden to Marshall next week .....it'll be down to $1K in it , huge risk
View attachment 1189683
View attachment 1189685
Great points !!I'm bringing Marshall in this week and Whitfield next week.
BE's had a bearing cos I want to go use Houston and Amartey for the $ to get Whitfield
Marshall's BE is 54 so he could go up 20-30k with a score around 100.
Whit's BE is 115 so it's unlikely his score will move much.
Madden's BE is over his average so might lose $, is Newcomb an option?
If I say Marshall then he'll tweak the bone stress in his ankle, if I say Whitfield then he'll trip over a piece of tissue paper and concuss himself.4tune8 .....who'll score more this week, Marshall (v CARL) or Whitfield (V PORT) ??
If I say Marshall then he'll tweak the bone stress in his ankle, if I say Whitfield then he'll trip over a piece of tissue paper and concuss himself.
The way Whitfield is going I'd expect him to have the higher score, although Marshall pulled a 122 against Port in his last game and I'd think that against weaker opposition he should score ok.
Over the next 4 rounds:
GWS. Port, Geelong, Tigers, Blues
ST.K. Blues, Sydney, Geelong, Freo
So they both have pretty much similar matchups, Geelong is probably the toughest for Whit. but to finish with the Tigers and Blues is handy.
Marshall (when rucking) could be up against the 2nd ruck who is pretty much non existent in his matchups, Geelong will be the hardest though with a better defence when he's forward
Yeah maybe, a weeks rest wouldn't have done him any harm either.Marshall sounds "Iffy" to me this week .....since his return, he's only had the one big score ....thinking another week to have a look at him makes sense
View attachment 1189789
In home detention, unable to run for 2 weeks ??Yeah maybe, a weeks rest wouldn't have done him any harm either.
As Ratts said in the tweet "he's had a program to do, it's unique"In home detention, unable to run for 2 weeks ??
Agree ...everyone has differing team needs ....so not as simple as saying player A is preferred over Player BAs Ratts said in the tweet "he's had a program to do, it's unique"
End of the day you have to go with your gut. Not a great deal of options for me as I can't rely on Darcy (again) and I really need to get that sh*t stain Haynes out of my team
As Ratts said in the tweet "he's had a program to do, it's unique"
End of the day you have to go with your gut. Not a great deal of options for me as I can't rely on Darcy (again) and I really need to get that sh*t stain Haynes out of my team
Yeah Meek going out would give me a lot more confidence in Darcy. I think he plays though. Game was over at 3QT and he continued to play. Had his best quarter of the game too scoring 35. Freo still a slim chance of finals alsoHe’d probably still be in better condition than Darcy if ordered uber eats and did nothing for two weeks to be honest. It’s actually scary owning Darcy, kinda hoping they name him or Meek out
Yeah same here, can’t see Meek going out without Lobb coming in though which sucks. Atleast Lobb can play forwardYeah Meek going out would give me a lot more confidence in Darcy. I think he plays though. Game was over at 3QT and he continued to play. Had his best quarter of the game too scoring 35. Freo still a slim chance of finals also
Jake Bowey looks like he’ll debut for the dees this weekend. 230k M/F, JS is probably pretty shaky but the kid has some serious talent! Averaging 94 in the VFL if you take away his injured 10 aswell
Now that lockdown has lifted can you get over to Dees training and give Goodwin a swift uppercut for even considering that??! We need Bowey to make his debut in round 1 next year as a $170k rook!
Seriously does Goody not even pause to consider our fantasy teams or something??
He’ll be a good midpriced option for next yearNow that lockdown has lifted can you get over to Dees training and give Goodwin a swift uppercut for even considering that??! We need Bowey to make his debut in round 1 next year as a $170k rook!
Seriously does Goody not even pause to consider our fantasy teams or something??
I’d rather option 2 at the moment. Walsh was shocking on the weekend, still not sure he can handle the tag. Fiorini is on fire and like you said keeping Bianco gives you meat to upgrade Hous/Hind/Haynes.Which option
1
Out: Bianco, Pendlebury
In: 170k, Walsh
2
Out: Connolly, Pendlebury
In: 170k, Fiorini
3
Out: Hind, Pendlebury
In: T.Kelly, Marshall
1 is obviously ideal, but using Bianco to upgrade Pendles means I won't be able to add much value to upgrade Houston, Haynes and Hind if I ever get the chance.
In home detention, unable to run for 2 weeks ??
I like 3.Would love someones opinion on the following three trades
Haynes and Pendlebury to either:
1. Mills and Daniher
Vs.
2. Short and Sidebottom
Vs.
3. Newman and Ziebell
I think 3 too. 1 is tempting because of Mills but wouldn't want Daniher near my side. I don't mind 2 only because Houli is missing and Sidey saw more mid time last week when Pendles went down. Probably a riskier option than 1 thoughWould love someones opinion on the following three trades
Haynes and Pendlebury to either:
1. Mills and Daniher
Vs.
2. Short and Sidebottom
Vs.
3. Newman and Ziebell