Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mmmm Sexy Stewart with his 180 against Freo last year, good upside for a VC. You guys have changed my mind.Probably Stewart (VC) and Oliver(C) if Stewart goes large...
Bont for a safe 120 with the potential to go large or Dunks for a possible ceiling game.Wasted my VC on N.Daicos, knew I should have stuck with Stewart..
Who.the hell do I put the C on now out of Bont, Stewart, Dunkley, Neale or Sicily? Have it on Bont atm as I feel like he's the safest option out of the lot to go 120+
I'm going stewart so anyone but him should be fine.Wasted my VC on N.Daicos, knew I should have stuck with Stewart..
Who.the hell do I put the C on now out of Bont, Stewart, Dunkley, Neale or Sicily? Have it on Bont atm as I feel like he's the safest option out of the lot to go 120+
Bont is definitely the safest play, got to play safe with your Captain at the decent you are on - let other people like me chase it with a risky CWasted my VC on N.Daicos, knew I should have stuck with Stewart..
Who.the hell do I put the C on now out of Bont, Stewart, Dunkley, Neale or Sicily? Have it on Bont atm as I feel like he's the safest option out of the lot to go 120+
The Stewart/Bont VC call is messing me
Gawn rucks all day unless they’re 10 goals up and if that happens he’s probably already on 120 anyway.Captan choice out of
Sicily - may be tagged based on RTB
Gawn - Grundy is a possible Sub?
We were worried about him coming up against *ing Briggs lmaotrying to remember why I didn’t VC English.
I must have had a good reason but can’t for the life of me think what it is now.
You could call it "VC'ing 101"