There was a member recognition function on before the game, I think that may have inflated the crowd figure as Freo aren't exactly a drawcard at the moment.
Did you recognise any other members?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There was a member recognition function on before the game, I think that may have inflated the crowd figure as Freo aren't exactly a drawcard at the moment.
Did you recognise any other members?
Truly love your assessment of the game when you focus on the positives aspects mate, you're an astute observer.KJ is heading into some top form
Hanners is in an under every week , his commitment to get the ball first is 2nd to none
Melican is becoming such a good running defender
Macca still one the smartest and cleanest on the team
Rohan played higher and linked up well
Hanners is elite by foot.
But his field kicking is f.. Ken pathetic
Don't be bloody silly. Towers was very good. I believe in praising players if they play well and saying so if they don't. I just don't get the hate for players some of you express. If Jordan Foote had a good game I'd say so even if I do believe he lacks the requisite skills for AFL. Astounding.Ha ha... not even close. Towers was easily our worst on ground.
Against weaker teams (like Freo and the Saints a few weeks back) we tend to play more corridor style football, high risk/reward stuff with a chain of handballs off halfback down the guts with players streaming down the middle. I could be wrong, but we don't tend to try stuff like that against better sides? We go a more conservative path, wider, seeking a ball in on the wing, and building down the flanks?
I might be miles off with this, just wondering if anyone else has noticed this?
True, think back to the Hawks game.Seem to play more from defence and move slower against better teams too
Aaah, you know how torrid it gets at times. Hard to know which member belongs to which member.Did you recognise any other members?
Don't be bloody silly. Towers was very good. I believe in praising players if they play well and saying so if they don't. I just don't get the hate for players some of you express. If Jordan Foote had a good game I'd say so even if I do believe he lacks the requisite skills for AFL. Astounding.
On HUAWEI Y560-U23 using BigFooty.com mobile app
The better teams don't give us the time to go through the corridor at every opportunity as they defend better & shut down our space. But when we are playing well we do it to our opposition too.Against weaker teams (like Freo and the Saints a few weeks back) we tend to play more corridor style football, high risk/reward stuff with a chain of handballs off halfback down the guts with players streaming down the middle. I could be wrong, but we don't tend to try stuff like that against better sides? We go a more conservative path, wider, seeking a ball in on the wing, and building down the flanks?
I might be miles off with this, just wondering if anyone else has noticed this?
His intensity was good. KJ, Hannas, Smithy, Heens all turned the ball over, less so Heens but a couple of times. Even Lloydy turns the ball over occasionally. As to fumbles and dropped marks Tippet gas to be seen as one of the worst at this. He dropped an easy mark against a smaller opponent, it was a gimme, unforgivable for a tall. He fumbled all day. But I still think he put in and so did Towers.If fumbling, dropping chest marks and constantly turning the ball over = very well, give the man a Brownlow.
Pound for pound, dollar for dollar, at this point in the season, I am happy with where Deano is at. He makes errors as do others & as I've said before, the minute someone else steps up to the plate to cover all the roles he covers in our team, Deano will be out.Towers on replay tries to copy rohan a bit, both like to leap into a mark, rohan takes them though, deano went ok again, would be unlucky not to stay in
His intensity was good. KJ, Hannas, Smithy, Heens all turned the ball over, less so Heens but a couple of times. Even Lloydy turns the ball over occasionally. As to fumbles and dropped marks Tippet gas to be seen as one of the worst at this. He dropped an easy mark against a smaller opponent, it was a gimme, unforgivable for a tall. He fumbled all day. But I still think he put in and so did Towers.
Let's fave it Towers is just your whipping boy. It would not matter how well he played, like a few weeks ago when he got 29, you would still find fault.
On HUAWEI Y560-U23 using BigFooty.com mobile app
Against weaker teams (like Freo and the Saints a few weeks back) we tend to play more corridor style football, high risk/reward stuff with a chain of handballs off halfback down the guts with players streaming down the middle. I could be wrong, but we don't tend to try stuff like that against better sides? We go a more conservative path, wider, seeking a ball in on the wing, and building down the flanks?
I might be miles off with this, just wondering if anyone else has noticed this?
What did we think of Mills game
Looks a future star
I like his intensity, and love his running pick the ball off the ground ability but if only he could improve his kicking.His intensity was good. KJ, Hannas, Smithy, Heens all turned the ball over, less so Heens but a couple of times. Even Lloydy turns the ball over occasionally. As to fumbles and dropped marks Tippet gas to be seen as one of the worst at this. He dropped an easy mark against a smaller opponent, it was a gimme, unforgivable for a tall. He fumbled all day. But I still think he put in and so did Towers.
Let's fave it Towers is just your whipping boy. It would not matter how well he played, like a few weeks ago when he got 29, you would still find fault.
On HUAWEI Y560-U23 using BigFooty.com mobile app
What did we think of Mills game
Looks a future star