Dark Sharks
Premium Kent
More like 1st to 7th year. Simmo still throws up Darling and Gaff as young developing players.Clubs tend to consider 1st - 4th year players as developing players.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
More like 1st to 7th year. Simmo still throws up Darling and Gaff as young developing players.Clubs tend to consider 1st - 4th year players as developing players.
Cripps can gagfBit worried about Karps, been dropped and out of contract at the end of the year.
What exactly does Cripps need to do to get dropped?
Clubs tend to consider 1st - 4th year players as developing players.
he played well when pyke was with us, fingers crossed
I was referring to KarpanyCripps has already moved back to WA, i doubt the club would send him off again as part of a package deal.
That's a tad too ruthless for the granny club
He also has diabetes. The uni students would be marching the streets in protest if a minority copped such 2nd class treatment.
Jesus, not many did. Darling included IIRCReasonable changes. Karps didn't lay a tackle last week. Didn't deserve to keep his spot imo
thought you meant cripps oopsI was referring to Karpany
Karps spot should have been secure for the rest of the season. His longest run of games was 3 (until injury). It takes more than that for a young player to really adjust to AFL level and truly feel like they belong out there. We've seen what it's done for Duggan, Nelson, Sheed and Barrass when Simmo, The other coaches and the MC backed them in. It's sending a message to the younger lads that you're not allowed to be inconsistent at AFL level while find your feet but it's perfectly fine for senior players like Cripps or if you're a young player that Simmo and the MC have a soft spot for.
Now that I got that little rant out, happy with the in's. And the other two outs, Schoey and Masto didn't deserve to keep their spot after last weekend.
I was just going to say the same thing. Is he still injured or is it a team balance thing?Cole Wellingham and Hill are the EMG.
Surprised no Barrass.
Still think we need to drop a tall.
Why?Changes are alright. Would've preferred for Wellingham to come in but you can't have everything.
Why?
Would be interesting to see him play in the midfield where we obviously got him to play originally, needs to remember how to kick thoughAccording to boondy, he apparently spurred EP from a 15 point deficit to a 84 point smashing after being moved to the centre. I haven't actually seen the game myself, but it sounds like Wellingham has slowly been gaining form over the past couple weeks.
Would be interesting to see him play in the midfield where we obviously got him to play originally, needs to remember how to kick though
I don't really understand how we've used him since he came over. From memory he was in and out of the side because injury, played a couple of games on the wing and then got shunted down to the backline.That's what I'm hoping we do. IMO Wellingham cost too much for us just to cut him after 4 years.
Except we are exponentially shitter now.Me too, although I was saying that after the derby last year and we somehow managed to beat all of GWS, Hawthorn and Adelaide.
I don't really understand how we've used him since he came over. From memory he was in and out of the side because injury, played a couple of games on the wing and then got shunted down to the backline.