- Oct 2, 2010
- 19,723
- 70,639
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
So because we beat 17th placed North (who was on a historic run of 40+ point losses) , we shouldn't omit two players with poor contributions in favour of our 2nd highest goal kicker (Higgins) and the best performed in the VFL the game prior (Butler)? Byrnes never took the field given he was sub so his omission allowed him to play his first game at any level for the first time in a few weeks so that's not a negative.Sorry BT, that was my mistake... off the top of my head I incorrectly thought Essendon was the next game. I did my fact checking now and the results are probably more damming on our selection proces.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Round 11 - solid WIN over North and sit fourth on the ladder with 8 wins and 3 losses
Next Game - 3 fit (not injured) young players DROPPED from the side - OUT - Sharman, NWM, Byrnes
Result - LOSS vs Brisbane
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Round 21 - Thumped by an understrength Geelong
Next Game - No changes?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not sure what is particularly damning about the selection process there. We can't call for us to be a stronger club with higher standards if we then complain about bringing in better performed players into the best 22.
We don't know yet if there will be changes after our loss to the side sitting on top of the ladder. Sandy are coming off a 5 day break and a loss, so there is probably not as many layers putting up their hands for selection as there were after a Sandy win