reload141
Club Legend
- Sep 5, 2013
- 2,626
- 2,481
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Boston Celtics
1st one if Steven turns up.
Surely Mitch Robinson will tag him....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
1st one if Steven turns up.
JJWho would you trade out to try and even it up? McVeigh to KOTD Rance?
Surely Mitch Robinson will tag him....
whats wrong with Shiel..?Do i bring in Neale or Rockliff because i'm getting rid of Shiel if there is no chaos team selections that effect me
Been struggling to hit above 100. + Neale is much better and could hit 130+whats wrong with Shiel..?
And Neale>Rocky easy this season
1 trade left. BF Div9 and NMBF Div1 GFs.
In: Boomer.
Out: Zorko? Or McVeigh and put Hipwood on field?
Don't even care.
Just as likely to play a blinder to stick it up them or for a farewell as for a new contract.I was going to bring boomer in this week because i assumed he'd be trying his guts out in the hope of getting a new contract.
Now that's off the table I'm definitely not picking him, all the farewell stuff before and during the game will be too distracting for him to get a big SC score i reckon
Just as likely to play a blinder to stick it up them or for a farewell as for a new contract.
Anyway, this is one of the reasons I stall at about top 10K in SC instead of getting really good. I'd sometimes rather have a bloke in for sentimental reasons even if it costs me a bit (being knocked out of my cashie makes it an easier call).
So anyway ...
Boomer + McVeigh + Lobb
or
Boomer + Zorko + Hipwood (and can loophole Lobb if Phillips doesn't play)
Neale.Do i bring in Neale or Rockliff because i'm getting rid of Shiel if there is no chaos team selections that effect me
If you got the trade up your sleeve and can avoid carnage then it's a great move...if he scores more.Been struggling to hit above 100. + Neale is much better and could hit 130+
Ballsy!...I'm considering Sloane > Seb Ross.
How do you feel about the news mate?1 trade left. BF Div9 and NMBF Div1 GFs.
In: Boomer.
Out: Zorko? Or McVeigh and put Hipwood on field?
Don't even care.
Not expecting big scores from Lobb this week with Goldstein and Thompson and Tarrant could limit his output. Also North might put in a good performance for Boomer and the other North players who have been denied another season by northSo anyway ...
Boomer + McVeigh + Lobb
or
Boomer + Zorko + Hipwood (and can loophole Lobb if Phillips doesn't play)
I think Thompson out with a groin...could be wrong.Not expecting big scores from Lobb this week with Goldstein and Thompson and Tarrant could limit his output. Also North might put in a good performance for Boomer and the other North players who have been denied another season by north
Wasn't he out with a groin just a couple weeks ago? played last week right? you could be right. Firrito might leave everything he's got out on the footy field considering he doesn't have long.I think Thompson out with a groin...could be wrong.
Initial shock but I'll get over it.How do you feel about the news mate?
Sad to see it go down like this...still playing good footy and would of loved the decision to be made by the players rather than the club. I get the club wants to blood some young guys and these old guys are filling spots but glory be mate...Boomer! The leading games great gettin the boot....stinks!
Did it again early in the Syd game. McDonald a likely in with Hansen taking Thompson's role. Either that or Vickers-Willis in for Thompson and McDonald for one of McKenzie/Mullett.Wasn't he out with a groin just a couple weeks ago? played last week right? you could be right. Firrito might leave everything he's got out on the footy field considering he doesn't have long.
Did it again early in the Syd game. McDonald a likely in with Hansen taking Thompson's role. Either that or Vickers-Willis in for Thompson and McDonald for one of McKenzie/Mullett.