Remove this Banner Ad

Captains Round 3 VC/Captains

  • Thread starter Thread starter stevebbb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Agree but if you have Jackson against nothing you don't have a choice. Both could go 200.
Jackson (VC) for me, will be heavily influenced by the weather (cyclone) conditions in Perth .....fall back option will be Naicos, assuming he doesn't get the Bedford tag
 
Jackson (VC) for me, will be heavily influenced by the weather (cyclone) conditions in Perth .....fall back option will be Naicos, assuming he doesn't get the Bedford tag
Would the wet weather likely see more ball ups/contested possessions though? Thus Jackson getting more ruck opportunities/follow up tackles.

Or if its that bad is it just put Shrek in the ruck and just win by having a bigger body?
 
Would the wet weather likely see more ball ups/contested possessions though? Thus Jackson getting more ruck opportunities/follow up tackles.

Or if its that bad is it just put Shrek in the ruck and just win by having a bigger body?
Definite possibility, the greater use of Shrek .....I'm also wary of reduced marks for Jackson, and a reduction in DE ....as players simply aim for territory gains in the wet

Something for me to think about
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Xerri VC, Butters C. Just checking I've done the loophole correctly as per below?

Have got the C on Serong. If Xerri dominates I leave it untouched, if he somehow underwhelms I simply move the C onto Butters and nothing else requires moving, is that correct?
1774581985266.webp
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Xerri VC, Butters C. Just checking I've done the loophole correctly as per below?

Have got the C on Serong. If Xerri dominates I leave it untouched, if he somehow underwhelms I simply move the C onto Butters and nothing else requires moving, is that correct?
View attachment 2563199
Correct
 
Legend thank you! and at the risk of a silly question, I assume Linsday will just automatically take Serongs spot, based on how I've currently got it setup? (Presuming Lindsay plays)
Yep, all good. Although will only count if he's one of your best-18 scorers.
 
Xerri VC, Butters C. Just checking I've done the loophole correctly as per below?

Have got the C on Serong. If Xerri dominates I leave it untouched, if he somehow underwhelms I simply move the C onto Butters and nothing else requires moving, is that correct?
View attachment 2563199
I must do back to front. Given Butters plays Sunday if Xerri scores more than 130 ill just switch to Serong sat night
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom