Remove this Banner Ad

Opinion Round 4 Changes vs. Melbourne

  • Thread starter Thread starter YelloMit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sutcliffe was very good in the WAFL too and really took the game on.
And has failed every time he has been brought back.

No changes. People calling for Hughes to be dropped don't realise how good this bloke could be if he was allowed to string a few AFL games together. He has a lot to offer. Don't fret about Tucker, he will get another chance. Just not right now.
 
And has failed every time he has been brought back.

No changes. People calling for Hughes to be dropped don't realise how good this bloke could be if he was allowed to string a few AFL games together. He has a lot to offer. Don't fret about Tucker, he will get another chance. Just not right now.
Don't disagree with leaving the team unchanged for next week, but I (and many others) have put Sheridan and Crozier in the same bracket as Sutty - tigers at WAFL, pussies at AFL.

Sheridan and Crozier both proved me wrong last night, I'm hoping Sutty will as well at some point.

A few games at WAFL may be just what he needs.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Definitely not this game , I would rest Johnson if he is sore , but he look million buck in the last quarter. Nobody should be drop , but nobody is safe if they don't put in effort like yesterday .
 
Sutcliffe had a dip for Peel and defended well. Even late in the last he put in a big solo effort to spoil a certain mark and then followed up with a crunching front on tackle which went unrewarded and weight numbers saw Subi kick the sealer. But he was still a little untidy with his skills. A few handballs I saw either lead to turnovers or put teammate under pressure. I think a week or two further in the WAFL will do him some good while the youngsters get a bit more taste.

The two I'd look at would be Tucker and Tabs. It will be a case of team balance as to whether they come in or not. The MCG suits a taller fwd line. It will be hard to make changes.
 
Sutcliffe had a dip for Peel and defended well. Even late in the last he put in a big solo effort to spoil a certain mark and then followed up with a crunching front on tackle which went unrewarded and weight numbers saw Subi kick the sealer. But he was still a little untidy with his skills. A few handballs I saw either lead to turnovers or put teammate under pressure. I think a week or two further in the WAFL will do him some good while the youngsters get a bit more taste.

The two I'd look at would be Tucker and Tabs. It will be a case of team balance as to whether they come in or not. The MCG suits a taller fwd line. It will be hard to make changes.
I will take tab as emergency, I need to see how peel play without tab , especially strnadica as a forward.
 
I will take tab as emergency, I need to see how peel play without tab , especially strnadica as a forward.
That is the worst reason for taking a player that I have ever heard.

The best thing for Fremantle is to either play Taberner, or leave him to play at Peel. That is the best thing for Taberner as well.
 
That is the worst reason for taking a player that I have ever heard.

The best thing for Fremantle is to either play Taberner, or leave him to play at Peel. That is the best thing for Taberner as well.
Just my opinion , don't take it too seriously, can always swap at last minute with emergency based on what Ross think . Who would you take then? Collins ? Tucker? Or Griffin

Tab , Collins tucker all can go and visit their family but only one will make the trip.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

It would be silly to drop any of the new inclusions. I personally would be happy to bring Tucker in for Spurr, but Spurr played OK and don't really see any changes being made.
 
Why would you make any changes? Giving Hughes one game is nuts


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

After watching the replay, I can now see that Hughes did ok.

Unless the whippersnappers do bugger all, they should get at least 2 - 3 games to build their confidence up.

Why change for changes sake ?.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

No Changes. this side barring injuries should be given at least 3-4 games. Tucker and Tabs need to keep racking up big N0's to force their way in.
 
Look guys and gals, as a rep of the darcy tucker support crew. Darcy was throwing lasers in the peel game yesterday. Easily best of field, including upping his tackle rate by infintity. This effort needs to be rewarded. The pressure needs to be maintained. Put him in!
 
As Sutty's old buddy, I must remind people how attacking he actually was up to early in 2015. Not sure where and when things started going wrong for him, but he's just been so down on confidence the last 18 months. I think a few weeks at the WAFL may be just what he needs to get his touch and his confidence back. Hopefully it gives him impetus to hold hard at it and force his way back in the way Croz and Sherro have.

Would like Tucker in, but for whom?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom