- Sep 3, 2005
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- West Coast Eagles
I'd simply like to see them do away with the 3300 point per game standard. I know people say it's the same as having 4 premiership points for a game regardless of whether it's the top two teams playing or the bottom two teams, but I think SC should be different. Why should a player who plays exceptionally well in one game score less than someone who plays worse in another game just because he's in a higher quality game?It's crap, because it impacts players purely on the time, not on the effectiveness.
I'd personally change scaling in these situations by changing the weightings based on their importance on the game.
So high-scoring games, drop the weighting for goals only incrementally through the game.
Wet, high tackling grind? Drop the weighting for tackles only.
Similarly, for games with low stats where 3300 isn't going to be reached, increase weightings accordingly.
Low-scoring game, increase weighting per goal only
Yeah i went to opposite. Every year is a lottery except the KOTD Gawn and Grundy get. And now maybe Hickey.Don't disagree it gives me the shits to. Even more considering this year I started 5 600k plus mids and bugger all chip scabs!
Yeah. I know.CD make the scores mate not FF
Just the algorinthifgkjdfg bbro.
Never changed since 2015