Game Day Round 4 Matchday Discussion

[Tso1967]

5 / 478

FRI- Short Dusty Wines

 

[mochacinolatte]

Mills 25 touches, 2 tackles, 1 goal, 7 clearances, 2 clangers 80% DE - 88 points


Ridscab 28 touches, 0 tackles, 0 goals, 0 clearances, 3 clangers, 78% DE - 123 points



Doesn't pay to be a midfielder who impacts the game, 2nd most clearances on the ground, big at stoppages, lays tackles and wins his own footy gaiz

Sydney juiced his scores with so many behinds lmao and OOTB

 

[Here2tellyouwhy]

Mills 25 touches, 2 tackles, 1 goal, 7 clearances, 2 clangers 80% DE - 88 points


Ridscab 28 touches, 0 tackles, 0 goals, 0 clearances, 3 clangers, 78% DE - 123 points



Doesn't pay to be a midfielder who impacts the game, 2nd most clearances on the ground, big at stoppages, lays tackles and wins his own footy gaiz

But he algoruimrthtghmgbm rm guys

 

[King Max]

Free kicks little lob sided tonight. Looks like Heeney out, umpires subbed in.

 

[pulpdriver]

NSWCROW , how do you not have any of the Swans rookies?

 

[Here2tellyouwhy]

Scored harshly in 2nd half coz he did eff all I think.

His team won over 4 quarters.
He was huge for 80% of the game.

 

[OnlyPowerForever]

4/367

Will probably field Powell over Campbell's 49

Another game with a close finish where a final quarter with only a few touches has seen massive down scaling of players' scores instead of the usual modest gains. Very similar to what happened in the Adelaide/Gold Coast match last week. Something has changed with the weighting.

I'm thinking the opposite, that the weightings are the same but don't suit the different style of football. With the current scoring system, higher DE% and more marks is meaning they're approaching the 3300 target a lot quicker. So in a close game, giving the big points to the big moments (eg Buddy went from 57 to 81 with that goal) means they're literally stripping those points off everyone else to keep it close to the 3300.

Just my thoughts.

 

[Judd_Magic]

Traded out Cox to get CJ in. Good stuff Fred, ya kent

Don't worry, just Roughy big Cox back in.

 

[ImissFrosty]

4/303
Lloyd Warner Gulden Campbell
Have to put it in context of 1 premo 3 rookies, pretty decent.
Campbell I had on field over Jones and Brockman so that's fine.

 

[South of the Yarra]

4/309 from 3 rooks and an M3. Not too bad. Not too good.

 

[pulpdriver]

How did Zerrett end up on 104? I swear he was like 116 last I checked.

 

[Rayzorwire]

Was so close to starting with him, then trading the new Gull King in, now I'm feeling a little like...

 

[ForeverHardcore]

Merrett scaled down to 104 cheating scum

 

[THECHIEFTON]

His team won over 4 quarters.
He was huge for 80% of the game.

You know that's not how the scoring system works though.

 

[mochacinolatte]

How did Zerrett end up on 104? I swear he was like 116 last I checked.

CD smoking some good kush.

 

[pulpdriver]

Lloyd scaled down to 95 too. * you, CD. ******* pieces of s**t.

 

[Goats]

Wow. Lloyd did better n fantasy than in SuperCoach.

A sign of the end of days.

 

[South of the Yarra]

Someone doesn’t have Merrett at CD

 

[hoddo]

I'm thinking the opposite, that the weightings are the same but don't suit the different style of football. With the current scoring system, higher DE% and more marks is meaning they're approaching the 3300 target a lot quicker. So in a close game, giving the big points to the big moments (eg Buddy went from 57 to 81 with that goal) means they're literally stripping those points off everyone else to keep it close to the 3300.

Just my thoughts.

That's probably true. There's been a few games where we've known the total has reached 3300 with a few minutes to go and we've seen points taken from players who aren't touching the ball to get points for the ones who are.

 

[THECHIEFTON]

Merrett scaled down to 104 cheating scum

Wait wut...

 

[Here2tellyouwhy]

I'm thinking the opposite, that the weightings are the same but don't suit the different style of football. With the current scoring system, higher DE% and more marks is meaning they're approaching the 3300 target a lot quicker. So in a close game, giving the big points to the big moments (eg Buddy went from 57 to 81 with that goal) means they're literally stripping those points off everyone else to keep it close to the 3300.

Just my thoughts.

This.

Why else do campaigners keepo going backwards for doing well in the first 3/4

 

[South of the Yarra]

Lloyd scaled down to 100 too. fu** you, CD. ******* pieces of sh*t.

95

 

[Deliverance]

Merrett scaled down to 104 cheating scum

Mother *rs

 

[pulpdriver]

Someone doesn’t have Merrett at CD

Absolute cheating can'ts.

 

[Scythe94]

I still wanna know how the * Watermelon went from 70 to 56