It’s an extra round tacked onto the season and the SA state government is chipping in as well. Of course it will generate more revenue.
Plus each club is getting an additional $750k towards the soft cap. It’s a win.
Prediction Round 5, 2023: Changes vs Geelong (Gather Round)
- Thread starter kane249
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
It’s an extra round tacked onto the season and the SA state government is chipping in as well. Of course it will generate more revenue.
Plus each club is getting an additional $750k towards the soft cap. It’s a win.
Bender_
X
It's Gather Round in Melbourne every weekend mate.
Get_The_Gaff
Premiership Player
- Apr 4, 2021
- 4,672
- 10,624
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Saw our changes on afl site
Afl title- Eagles get a speed boost
First player in witherden ........
Afl title- Eagles get a speed boost
First player in witherden ........
YeoGabbaGabba
Watching Derby 58 Highlights
Considering I don’t have to treck down to f**king Kardinia this year I’m on board with it. Decent turnout at training today
It's literally an extra round of games bolted into the season, topped up as you mention by the SA Gov paying to be the host. It will definitely make the league money.
Bazzo traveling to Adelaide after playing WAFL to replace Edwards according to the WAFL commentator
- Jan 13, 2013
- 23,123
- 45,344
- AFL Club
- West Coast
If it gets to the point where we can't field a team can we just swap out a couple of players from the other team's bench every quarter like in under 10s?
RedWeddingGuest
Debutant
- Mar 20, 2023
- 134
- 154
- AFL Club
- West Coast
And now EH appears to have injured his ankle in the Beagles game…
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
- Sep 28, 2009
- 23,177
- 32,560
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Reading FC
What would be the point of that. He wont be playing
- Oct 9, 2009
- 11,250
- 12,020
- AFL Club
- West Coast
So the sub will be between Foley and West.
Wouldn't mind seeing Foley get a run.
Pissed that it wasn't Hewett instead.
I hope Simmo is happy with his decision to drop him for more game time in the WAFL lol...
Wouldn't mind seeing Foley get a run.
Pissed that it wasn't Hewett instead.
I hope Simmo is happy with his decision to drop him for more game time in the WAFL lol...
I guess in case there's a last minute injury to Rotham/Barrass?
- Oct 9, 2009
- 11,250
- 12,020
- AFL Club
- West Coast
He's flying over after playing today's WAFL match?
That's pretty rough to go from not ready for AFL to playing 2 matches in 2 days.
So you are happy our first round draft pick is injured to stick it up Simmo because the MC decided to play him down a level?
s**t hot take
- Oct 9, 2009
- 11,250
- 12,020
- AFL Club
- West Coast
No I'm not happy, I'm pissed that he's injured in a game he could not have needed to play in.So you are happy our first round draft pick is injured to stick it up Simmo because the MC decided to play him down a level?
s**t hot take
I wanted him to be back in the AFL ASAP. I just wish that he wasn't dropped by Simmo, he could've just been a sub.
Dunno how you came to that conclusion lol.
Last edited:
Well the LOL after saying you hope he is happy is a good indicator that you are pleased that a decision made by the MATCH COMMITTEE has blown up in Simmos face.No I'm not happy, I'm pissed that he's injured in a game he could not have needed to play in.
I wanted him to be back in the AFL ASAP. I just wish that he wasn't dropped by Simmo, he could've just been a sub.
Dunno how you came to that conclusion lol.
The MC made a decision they thought was best for the team and Hewitt and you seem to revel in the fact he has been injured in the WAFL as if that was an entirely predictable outcome and they should have known better.
WTF indeed.
In some sense tho what’s the point of sending sending him back to wafl where they knew it was gonna most likely be a bloodbath not much to learn when u get battered by 160points
- Oct 9, 2009
- 11,250
- 12,020
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Again I'm not pleased Hewett got injured. I DID NOT want him to get injured. AT ALL.
I think that he will be a gun.
The lol meant I was jokingly blaming Simmo for the injury because he dropped him.
But fine, you can go ahead and continue misconstruing what people say if that's your thing.
Last edited:
No I'm not happy, I'm pissed that he's injured in a game he could not have needed to play in.
I wanted him to be back in the AFL ASAP. I just wish that he wasn't dropped by Simmo, he could've just been a sub.
Dunno how you came to that conclusion lol.
Based on his stats I hope it was very early. Calm down Karen’s he isn’t AFL ready . I hope he makes it
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
- Oct 9, 2009
- 11,250
- 12,020
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Yep it was very early on in the first quarter. Never even had a chance to prove himself yet.
Was hopeful he would have some good performances and stake a claim for a recall in a few weeks.
Unfortunately this will interrupt his development.
Have you had a look at who our AFL team is playing this week?
The debate weather he should play or not is fine, there is a reasonable argument for both. LOLing and blaming Simmo for an unforeseeable injury, not so much.
Where in my post did I lol and blame simmo? You also said debating whether(correct spelling) he should of, or should have not played is fine?? Which is what I was doing in my post
- Status
