Captains Round 5 VC/Captain

[Judd_Magic]

+1

Selwood perma-not captain from here on in

Pendles, Goldy and Fyfe.

Not even bothering trusting anyone else from my team at the moment for the VC and C duties.

 

[karaoke]

Anything under a 100 I would view as a 'fail' when it comes to Captain choice.

Preferably 120+, but 100-120 all is not lost.

Was happy I took Pendles 119 last week as VC, not revert to Sloane as C.

With this in mind - how many 100's has each team let up this year?

Been keeping a spreadsheet, which I started thinking it might help me in some small way.

Anyway, thought I would share - may help somebody else with their choice of VC or Captain?



Hawthorn so far are hardest team to get a 100 against.

Geelong & Carlton are 2 teams with most against.

Interesting, Geelong are only averaging only 2x 100's a game to this point.

Thoughts?

 

[buttox]

Anything under a 100 I would view as a 'fail' when it comes to Captain choice.

Preferably 120+, but 100-120 all is not lost.

Was happy I took Pendles 119 last week as VC, not revert to Sloane as C.

With this in mind - how many 100's has each team let up this year?

Been keeping a spreadsheet, which I started thinking it might help me in some small way.

Anyway, thought I would share - may help somebody else with their choice of VC or Captain?

View attachment 128873

Hawthorn so far are hardest team to get a 100 against.

Geelong & Carlton are 2 teams with most against.

Interesting, Geelong are only averaging only 2x 100's a game to this point.

Thoughts?

what an interesting stat. gonna take 30min for me to think through it. thanks bud

 

[DuckYeah]

Take round one out, and north melbourne are bloody good at stopping blkes from gathering high scores.. Interesting stat, this is why I believe Swanny is my VC this week, I dont think ill even need to worry about choosing a captain

 

[karaoke]

what an interesting stat. gonna take 30min for me to think through it. thanks bud

Take round one out, and north melbourne are bloody good at stopping blkes from gathering high scores.. Interesting stat, this is why I believe Swanny is my VC this week, I dont think ill even need to worry about choosing a captain

Eventually I'll put a rolling average in over say 5 weeks to see if that gives any insight as well.

More of a 'form' filter.

I'll try to remember to update & post each week.

Any suggestions to what other info would be handy?

 

[Unique Name]

Anything under a 100 I would view as a 'fail' when it comes to Captain choice.

Preferably 120+, but 100-120 all is not lost.

Was happy I took Pendles 119 last week as VC, not revert to Sloane as C.

With this in mind - how many 100's has each team let up this year?

Been keeping a spreadsheet, which I started thinking it might help me in some small way.

Anyway, thought I would share - may help somebody else with their choice of VC or Captain?

View attachment 128873

Hawthorn so far are hardest team to get a 100 against.

Geelong & Carlton are 2 teams with most against.

Interesting, Geelong are only averaging only 2x 100's a game to this point.

Thoughts?

Great job krk004

Would be great if you update throughout the season.

 

[Faz 2000]

Good analysis. I'm looking at VC Swan into C Fyfe.

Hoping Swan runs rampant against my fairly craptacular Blues.

 

[FAILTOSUCCEED]

Good analysis. I'm looking at VC Swan into C Fyfe.

Hoping Swan runs rampant against my fairly craptacular Blues.

He's been in a moon boot all week Swan, will be lucky to play by all accounts... Fingers crossed.

 

[GOAUS!]

Hmmm, my loophole player is Read. If everyone else plays then it will have to be

Cripps VC
Fyfe C

 

[Faz 2000]

He's been in a moon boot all week Swan, will be lucky to play by all accounts... Fingers crossed.

Swan and the Pies say he's apples and if he gets through training OK tomorrow he's a sure-fire starter, so... I'm going with Swanny to shake off the ankle and pillage the Blues to the tune of 140+.

 

[Krujan]

I'm just going to stick with Pendles & Fyfe for the rest of the year, or at least until GAJ comes back and starts dominating again.

 

[toxic]

Take round one out, and north melbourne are bloody good at stopping blkes from gathering high scores.. Interesting stat, this is why I believe Swanny is my VC this week, I dont think ill even need to worry about choosing a captain

Okay I'll bite..

Why swan.
if i take rd1 out as you.indicated carlscum are about average in giving up 100's.

 

[toxic]

krk004 this is a wicked ass table.

Does it change if it extends to 115+. .which I'd seriously consider as a vc option to take?

 

[toxic]

I'm just going to stick with Pendles & Fyfe for the rest of the year, or at least until GAJ comes back and starts dominating again.

So pendles and fyfe all yr bud

 

[NT.Thunder]

Hmmm, my loophole player is Read. If everyone else plays then it will have to be

Cripps VC
Fyfe C

Interesting concept - What if Judd comes back in?

 

[TheOz]

In before he spuds up with a 60.

He'll still make over $60k this round with just a 60. The people who traded him out for an old scrub like Van Berlo are looking quite the cretins.

 

[karaoke]

krk004 this is a wicked ass table.

Does it change if it extends to 115+. .which I'd seriously consider as a vc option to take?

I just manually enter the results from each rd, so would have to go back & go again for 115+

100 was the mark as it's easy to glance at & tally up, but still seemed the best 'line in the sand'.

 

[GOAUS!]

Interesting concept - What if Judd comes back in?

Tbh it's either Cripps or Oxley, I haven't got much choice.

 

[Flandersss]

He'll still make over $60k this round with just a 60. The people who traded him out for an old scrub like Van Berlo are looking quite the cretins.

Your just happy he plays for Carlton

 

[TheOz]

Your just happy he plays for Carlton

Bloody oath but those that did that trade have netted -150 points and the loss of a bloke going to top $400k in a couple weeks which could even cost an additional trade later on when upgrading to add to the original trade.

 

[Amazing Bombers]

I'm just going to stick with Pendles & Fyfe for the rest of the year, or at least until GAJ comes back and starts dominating again.

Good call shouldn't get many if any dodgy scores there.

Bloody oath but those that did that trade have netted -150 points and the loss of a bloke going to top $400k in a couple weeks which could even cost an additional trade later on when upgrading to add to the original trade.

This is why I'm very reluctant to trade rookies early unless they get injured long term. Back to back 85s next 2 weeks will get Cripps to 421k.

 

[Captain Harley]

#istandforcripps

 

[JuddgementDay]

vc buddy - time for a bag of goals?
capt fyfe

 

[DuckYeah]

Okay I'll bite..

Why swan.
if i take rd1 out as you.indicated carlscum are about average in giving up 100's.

Little bit of confusion in there, i was talking about how good North are firstly..

Secondly, I think swanny will run around willy nilly and rack up a huge tally against the Bluebaggers.. However, i do eat my words a lot and am never confident in predicting how well someone will do, unless it was GAJ of 2014 haha

 

[Kadog]

Anything under a 100 I would view as a 'fail' when it comes to Captain choice.

Preferably 120+, but 100-120 all is not lost.

Was happy I took Pendles 119 last week as VC, not revert to Sloane as C.

With this in mind - how many 100's has each team let up this year?

Been keeping a spreadsheet, which I started thinking it might help me in some small way.

Anyway, thought I would share - may help somebody else with their choice of VC or Captain?

View attachment 128873

Hawthorn so far are hardest team to get a 100 against.

Geelong & Carlton are 2 teams with most against.

Interesting, Geelong are only averaging only 2x 100's a game to this point.

Thoughts?

The 'stats man'. Good stuff bud