Captains Round 5 VC / Captain

[Flandersss]

When Laird scores 140+ on Friday night, I will be vindicated and you will prove to be the try hard you are. As will the couple of "geniuses" who like your post for no apparent reason. I'm sorry if my choice of vice captain offends you, next time I'll be sure to consider your choice and hope he doesn't spud it up like Danger and Fyfe have down on multiple occasions this year

Enjoy your "premium platinum" and the ego boost that comes with it. Hope it makes you sleep better at night.

Yeah, nah DH.

You post dribble. It takes up space of the content I actually want to read, not rocket science.

People like you will drive the decent sc posters away, then what? You, Asho & that Edmund will be here all alone.

 

[Goats]

Can you leave already?

You're a waste of everybody's time & your just wasting space posting.

Sick of seeing your dribble all over the SC forum, even if you are genuine.

 

[toxic]

Laird's average is as much as Pendles.
He is also the Friday night game, I don't have ability to manage supercoach this weekend (until monday).

That is why.

I get the Friday nite thing and if he's your friday nite option ten good luck!

 

[Alexwce]

Can you leave already?

You're a waste of everybody's time & your just wasting space posting.

Sick of seeing your dribble all over the SC forum, even if you are genuine.

You quoted an explanation, none of which was total nonsense. Last week my VC was Naitanui (shame because I changed from Yeo 5 mins before bounce down – which I’m sure had I been posting but I temporarily banished myself as I was scarred deeply by you and your henchman’s willingness to insist I am a troll / young tacker. Sure you could probably justify “dribble” on the trades thread when I ask questions about Jack Lloyd or Adam Cooney but none of my C/VC choices are dribbles and are well justified. You didn’t have to quote my reasoning but I felt ole mate wanted a reason when he questioned the choice of a defender, averaging 100 who has a reputation to go big.


The board is full of questions and answers. If you don’t want to give an answer to a question you consider inferior because of your higher than “thou” opinion of yourself, you are welcome to give answers to others. When a sensible discussion and thereby REAL content, I’ll be sure not to interrupt with my Levi Casboult inspired “dribble”


Yeah – I acknowledge this post is probably dribble, but the dribble wouldn’t be necessary if you had not started with your dribble. Instead you now have an entire page of dribble.


Have no problems in other boards on bigfooty, just seems that you and the Hawthorn blokes have a level of intolerance greater than that of SHY.

 

[Flandersss]

You quoted an explanation, none of which was total nonsense. Last week my VC was Naitanui (shame because I changed from Yeo 5 mins before bounce down – which I’m sure had I been posting but I temporarily banished myself as I was scarred deeply by you and your henchman’s willingness to insist I am a troll / young tacker. Sure you could probably justify “dribble” on the trades thread when I ask questions about Jack Lloyd or Adam Cooney but none of my C/VC choices are dribbles and are well justified. You didn’t have to quote my reasoning but I felt ole mate wanted a reason when he questioned the choice of a defender, averaging 100 who has a reputation to go big.


The board is full of questions and answers. If you don’t want to give an answer to a question you consider inferior because of your higher than “thou” opinion of yourself, you are welcome to give answers to others. When a sensible discussion and thereby REAL content, I’ll be sure not to interrupt with my Levi Casboult inspired “dribble”


Yeah – I acknowledge this post is probably dribble, but the dribble wouldn’t be necessary if you had not started with your dribble. Instead you now have an entire page of dribble.


Have no problems in other boards on bigfooty, just seems that you and the Hawthorn blokes have a level of intolerance greater than that of SHY.

OMFG.

The fact you think Casboult/Cooney etc are SuperCoach relavant, sums you up really. Not wasting anymore time. Good day sir.

 

[Listclogger]

I'm going NicNat into Fyfe at the moment as I only have GC and Swan as loophole options. Am assuming McCarthy will be back.

There's a chance Menadue will be dropped this week which would open up a few other options for me.

 

[toxic]

For those of us/you who went Danger last week as either VC or Capt

Interestingly the cats chose to manage their midfield last time against the bombers

TOG - low.

Wonder if other top teams will do this against bottom teams if the game is locked away at any stage?

 

[Asho81]

You quoted an explanation, none of which was total nonsense. Last week my VC was Naitanui (shame because I changed from Yeo 5 mins before bounce down – which I’m sure had I been posting but I temporarily banished myself as I was scarred deeply by you and your henchman’s willingness to insist I am a troll / young tacker. Sure you could probably justify “dribble” on the trades thread when I ask questions about Jack Lloyd or Adam Cooney but none of my C/VC choices are dribbles and are well justified. You didn’t have to quote my reasoning but I felt ole mate wanted a reason when he questioned the choice of a defender, averaging 100 who has a reputation to go big.


The board is full of questions and answers. If you don’t want to give an answer to a question you consider inferior because of your higher than “thou” opinion of yourself, you are welcome to give answers to others. When a sensible discussion and thereby REAL content, I’ll be sure not to interrupt with my Levi Casboult inspired “dribble”


Yeah – I acknowledge this post is probably dribble, but the dribble wouldn’t be necessary if you had not started with your dribble. Instead you now have an entire page of dribble.


Have no problems in other boards on bigfooty, just seems that you and the Hawthorn blokes have a level of intolerance greater than that of SHY.

Well this is entertaining

 

[Here2tellyouwhy]

Can you leave already?

You're a waste of everybody's time & your just wasting space posting.

Sick of seeing your dribble all over the SC forum, even if you are genuine.

But I didn't post anything

 

[Here2tellyouwhy]

For those of us/you who went Danger last week as either VC or Capt

Interestingly the cats chose to manage their midfield last time against the bombers

TOG - low.

Wonder if other top teams will do this against bottom teams if the game is locked away at any stage?

View attachment 237769

Other teams might but Geelong wont get a chance to do it again.

 

[Bob81]

Hanners into Gaz for me.

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk

 

[Didstar]

For those of us/you who went Danger last week as either VC or Capt

Interestingly the cats chose to manage their midfield last time against the bombers

TOG - low.

Wonder if other top teams will do this against bottom teams if the game is locked away at any stage?

View attachment 237769

Port seemed to shove Gray into the forward line for the last quarter after the game was well beyond doubt. So 2/4 opponents so far have rested some of their top line players. But it's certainly an interesting point that you bring up. It's also surprising (at least imo) that Essendon are still taking up a fair portion of the 3300 points allocated for the game in the GC and Port games, where it was larger winning margin, so combined with top line players "taking it easy" /being rested, perhaps their scoring potential against the bombers isn't what was anticipated. Guess we'll find out throughout the season.

 

[toxic]

Port seemed to shove Gray into the forward line for the last quarter after the game was well beyond doubt. So 2/4 opponents so far have rested some of their top line players. But it's certainly an interesting point that you bring up. It's also surprising (at least imo) that Essendon are still taking up a fair portion of the 3300 points allocated for the game in the GC and Port games, where it was larger winning margin, so combined with top line players "taking it easy" /being rested, perhaps their scoring potential against the bombers isn't what was anticipated. Guess we'll find out throughout the season.

Bombers have massive possession based game..racks up points despite being solidly beaten

The TOG may become more of an issue as the season goes on

 

[cdcanman]

Well this is entertaining

Bringing back memories?

 

[Test Tickle]

OMFG.

The fact you think Casboult/Cooney etc are SuperCoach relavant, sums you up really. Not wasting anymore time. Good day sir.

Hey hey hey hey

 

[Krujan]

Can you leave already?

You're a waste of everybody's time & your just wasting space posting.

Sick of seeing your dribble all over the SC forum, even if you are genuine.

Haha I think you've been hanging around me too long, bud.

 

[Fyfetheknife]

Gaj/Goldy VC

Merrett C

 

[Krujan]

For those of us/you who went Danger last week as either VC or Capt

Interestingly the cats chose to manage their midfield last time against the bombers

TOG - low.

Wonder if other top teams will do this against bottom teams if the game is locked away at any stage?

View attachment 237769

It might make people think twice about putting the VC or C on a gun mid versing a shit team or shit midfield.

 

[toxic]

It might make people think twice about putting the VC or C on a gun mid versing a shit team or shit midfield.

Agreed 110%

 

[schnoods]

Goldstein VC
GAWN C

No guts no glory!

 

[schnoods]

Fyfe has been managed this year but only plays hard and fast unless he cannot play.

He should knock out 120 plus.

 

[TheBeardAmigos]

Port seemed to shove Gray into the forward line for the last quarter after the game was well beyond doubt. So 2/4 opponents so far have rested some of their top line players. But it's certainly an interesting point that you bring up. It's also surprising (at least imo) that Essendon are still taking up a fair portion of the 3300 points allocated for the game in the GC and Port games, where it was larger winning margin, so combined with top line players "taking it easy" /being rested, perhaps their scoring potential against the bombers isn't what was anticipated. Guess we'll find out throughout the season.

which game was that? im sure we did it last year, defs not this year.
we are playing like chickens without heads, so there is no chance that Gray will be playing forward during the last quarter (for an extending period).

 

[TheBeardAmigos]

S Mitchell VC
Ward C

that is my thinking at the moment.
also tempted at Danger/Zerrett as C
and Hall as VC

 

[Didstar]

which game was that? im sure we did it last year, defs not this year.
we are playing like chickens without heads, so there is no chance that Gray will be playing forward during the last quarter (for an extending period).

Against Essendon in rd 3. From what I saw in the last quarter, Gray pretty much didn't leave the forward line. The other games, though, he was on ball pretty much all day with the occasional rest in the forwards. I agree though, he's far too good, and far to important to play anywhere other than midfield for any lengthy period of time.

 

[TheBeardAmigos]

Against Essendon in rd 3. From what I saw in the last quarter, Gray pretty much didn't leave the forward line. The other games, though, he was on ball pretty much all day with the occasional rest in the forwards.

fair enough, but we really should have kept him in the middle, as we were absolutely terrible in that game