MVP Round 7; Essendon vs North Melbourne

[BomberTime]

5. Heppell
4. Hurley
3. Goddard
2. Watson
1. Ambrose

 

[Bomber32]

5. Hurley
4. Heppell
3. Goddard
2. Ambrose
1. Watson

 

[Harlequin]

5. Hurley
4. Heppell
3. Ambrose
2. Goddard
1. Dempsey

 

[efcboy]

5 Hurley
4 Goddard
3 Fletcher
2 Heppell
1 Watson

 

[Pweter]

5. Hurley
4. Heppell
3. Goddard
2. Ambrose
1. Colyer

 

[Coldacre]

Yep. Gleeson was excellent.

BJ was far more damaging

 

[eth-dog]

BJ was far more damaging

You're allowed to think that. I disagree. Why do you have such a problem with it?

 

[pazza]

5 - Heppell
4 - Watson
3 - Hurley
2 - Colyer
1 - McKernan

 

[Coldacre]

You're allowed to think that. I disagree. Why do you have such a problem with it?

??
it's no biggie, just an opinion

 

[yaco55]

Coaches votes

10 - Ziebell
5 - Hansen
5 - Petrie
4 - Cunnington
3 - Hurley
2 - Goddard
1 - Heppell

One of the few weeks where I've agreed with the group of players - May have changed the order near the bottom.

 

[Halftimehero]

Coaches votes

10 - Ziebell
5 - Hansen
5 - Petrie
4 - Cunnington
3 - Hurley
2 - Goddard
1 - Heppell

One of the few weeks where I've agreed with the group of players - May have changed the order near the bottom.

Hurley should have got at least 6, I bet he got 3 from Hird and 0 from Scott, no way was both Petrie and Hansen better than him.

 

[efcboy]

Hurley should have got at least 6, I bet he got 3 from Hird and 0 from Scott, no way was both Petrie and Hansen better than him.

Suggest the votes would have been:

B.Scott
5 ziebell
4 Cunnington
3 Petrie
2 Goddard
1 Hansen

Hird
5 ziebell
4 Hansen
3 Hurley
2 Petrie
1 Heppell

 

[franjon]

5. Heppell
4. Hurley
3. Goddard
2. Ambrose
1. Watson

Votes for Dempsey are ******* ridiculous. People are getting sucked in by a bit of zip and the odd hard attempt. Must look a million bucks from armchairs because at the ground he is a liability. He struggled to hit targets, he gave his opponents far too much space goal side and gives away stupid frees. The negatives still far out way the positives. Just because he's gone from extremely shit to less shit it doesn't mean he deserves votes.

As a North fan and as an outsider I thought Heppell was outstanding as was Hurley. I thought Watson was ok early but died in the arse a bit.

 

[franjon]

Hurley should have got at least 6, I bet he got 3 from Hird and 0 from Scott, no way was both Petrie and Hansen better than him.

I reckon Ziebell was best on by a fair whack.

 

[Halftimehero]

I reckon Ziebell was best on by a fair whack.

No doubt but Hurley would have been third best at least and probably second

 

[DapperDon]

5. Hurley
4. Heppell
3. Goddard
2. Watson
1. Ambrose

 

[yaco55]

Hurley should have got at least 6, I bet he got 3 from Hird and 0 from Scott, no way was both Petrie and Hansen better than him.

Hurley's season is a touch over-rated, though he is travelling well. Hurley had his problems against Waite, but eventually got on top - The previous week Hurley was towelled up by Pavlich, necessitating Hooker to take over.

Hansen was very good, though him picking up Langford enabled him to dominate his position. No surprise that Petrie got votes as he played an important structural role for the kangaroos. Hurley could have gone above Cunnington who was a touch high in the voting.