Round 7 Trades

[Asho81]

That's not what your post said?? Man you're a confusing person..

I think indecisive is a better description

 

[stevebbb]

Thinking of trading CEY out instead of McIntosh and VDB to have mid and Def cover
Stupid or fine?

 

[Jiska]

Thinking of trading CEY out instead of McIntosh and VDB to have mid and Def cover
Stupid or fine?

Stupid is a little harsh, but stupid.

 

[stevebbb]

Stupid.

If Cripps it out and/or McIntosh is sub? Am I still stupid?

 

[Jiska]

If Cripps it out and/or McIntosh is sub? Am I still stupid?

You won't know before CEY is locked out.

But **** knows. Depends on your team.

 

[HTPunter]

Ended up going
Garlett -> McKenzie (Swan DP)
Rischitelli -> Pendlebury

Both Garlett and Rischitelli haven't been terrible picks. As odd as it would sound for the rest of you, both have helped me a lot more than you'd think.

Next week I aim to see Josh Kennedy into my side but I reckon I'll be a bit short there - price I pay for wanting Pendlebury in as early as possible.

But if McIntosh has a decent game and gets up to 260k, I'll have around 240k to play with to try and get the best midfielder I can for Vandenberg. Just got to hope Vandenberg and McIntosh beat their BE's by more than Kennedy does his.

Planned trades:
McIntosh -> Lever
Vandenberg -> Kennedy

 

[CotchyPls]

Need to do one of these trades this round.

Cripps > Ward or McIntosh > Lever

With the rumors of Cripps being out, might do the first trade.

 

[Jiska]

Need to do one of these trades this round.

Cripps > Ward or McIntosh > Lever

With the rumors of Cripps being out, might do the first trade.

Wait a week on Lever.

 

[Big Fozza]

Annnnnnd that'll make you not trade him??


Create one

Still trading him. Just not worth bench cover for those spud scores. Can't wait until he's outta the team. Will let me complete my fwd line

 

[Hoges64]

That's not what your post said?? Man you're a confusing person..

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand ignore.

 

[Men of Steele]

If he was a DPP he may almost be worth the risk, but there is no way you should be bringing in established mids at this stage unless you think they are going to be a top 10 mid between now and the end of the year. He's $425k for a reason. Pass. Just IMO.

Thankyou disaster avoided, i may well leave Rich unless someone can convince me in the merits of anyone else under 500k

 

[Jiska]

Thankyou disaster avoided, i may well leave Rich unless someone can convince me in the merits of anyone else under 500k

Barlow. SJ. Parker. Rockliff.

All better options than Rich.

 

[Kadog]

Wow. After ten different posts, (probably more) asking for advice, you took the option no-one recommended..

Gingy suggested it. I agreed & suggested he follow his advice.

Lol, not quite.
I've done Sloane to Mckenzie, 2nd trade to be decided.
Should've traded spud TBC.

Idjiot

 

[Kuuz]

Wait a week on Lever.

Agreed. I took a punt on McKenzie last week, but I was packing myself that whole Saints game. Not going to chance it twice.

Lever is highly rated by the crows, but Jisk knows his stuff. Wait till he's on le michael BUBBLE, and pounce.

 

[Knighta21]

So what are peoples thoughts on T Mitchell..... yay or nay??
Could go McIntosh > McKenzie and Hogan > Tmitch
Next week Vandeberg > Lever via Mackenzie and upgrade TBC...

 

[pincrusher]

Thankyou disaster avoided, i may well leave Rich unless someone can convince me in the merits of anyone else under 500k

I currently have Rich and he will become Mackenzie today as long as Mackenzie is not named sub. If he is then Rich becomes Titch instead. Rich has to go IMO. Been very disappointing. One of the easiest players in the comp to tag out of a game.

 

[buttox]

I currently have Rich and he will become Mackenzie today as long as Mackenzie is not named sub. If he is then Rich becomes Titch instead. Rich has to go IMO. Been very disappointing. One of the easiest players in the comp to tag out of a game.

devils advocate
he played the blues last week. everyone gets tagged against the blues.
rocky and beams hitting there straps.
less chance of future tags.
6 of one, half a dozen the other.

 

[toxic]

I currently have Rich and he will become Mackenzie today as long as Mackenzie is not named sub. If he is then Rich becomes Titch instead. Rich has to go IMO. Been very disappointing. One of the easiest players in the comp to tag out of a game.

When i picture the WTF was i thinking table

Sitting right next to my Looneyburger is your Mr Rich

 

[pincrusher]

devils advocate
he played the blues last week. everyone gets tagged against the blues.
rocky and beams hitting there straps.
less chance of future tags.
6 of one, half a dozen the other.

Yeah I see where you are coming from. For me, though, is he a top 10 mid? I have more chance of winning lotto 3 times in a row than that happening. So he has to go at some stage unless he was being kept as an M9 option. At this stage Cripps will be that for me. BE of 98 this week means he's likely to lose more money. The time is right IMO.

 

[pincrusher]

When i picture the WTF was i thinking table

Sitting right next to my Looneyburger is your Mr Rich

Half my team would be in serious contention this year!!

 

[buttox]

Yeah I see where you are coming from. For me, though, is he a top 10 mid? I have more chance of winning lotto 3 times in a row than that happening. So he has to go at some stage unless he was being kept as an M9 option. At this stage Cripps will be that for me. BE of 98 this week means he's likely to lose more money. The time is right IMO.

probably is.
im just wary on folks trading in titch as a premo.
hes not
hes a chance of being a premo. all signs point to it not happening imo

 

[pincrusher]

probably is.
im just wary on folks trading in titch as a premo.
hes not

As long as Mackenzie is not the sub it will be Rich> Mackenzie for me. Pockets nearly 300k and opens up DPP link with def. Still have the rest of the day to decide on Titch. My biggest worry is Zac Smith. Only reason he's getting a game is because they have nobody else to pick from. Wet game tonight in Perth may help the rucks scoring though.

 

[buttox]

As long as Mackenzie is not the sub it will be Rich> Mackenzie for me. Pockets nearly 300k and opens up DPP link with def. Still have the rest of the day to decide on Titch. My biggest worry is Zac Smith. Only reason he's getting a game is because they have nobody else to pick from. Wet game tonight in Perth may help the rucks scoring though.

yup thats the more solid trade imo.
seems a bit sideways
rich- titch
could back fire rich avg 95 for the year and titch get dropped for being titchy.

 

[pincrusher]

yup thats the more solid trade imo.
seems a bit sideways
rich- titch
could back fire rich avg 95 for the year and titch get dropped for being titchy.

That was my fall back if Mackenzie was named sub. I still may get Titch but set on Rich> Mackenzie as long as he gets a full game.

May go Jack Martin> Titch but was hoping Martin would be a keeper. Just can't seem to get a decent run at it. Seriously talented though.

Jiska are you holding Martin? Do you expect to keep him for the whole year?

 

[buttox]

That was my fall back if Mackenzie was named sub. I still may get Titch but set on Rich> Mackenzie as long as he gets a full game.

May go Jack Martin> Titch but was hoping Martin would be a keeper. Just can't seem to get a decent run at it. Seriously talented though.

Jiska are you holding Martin? Do you expect to keep him for the whole year?

fwiw
on zac smith round 12 bye.
ive got goldy and nicnat both round 13 byes. will drop nicnat before that round.