Captains Round 7 VC / Captain

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

The Made Guy

Club Legend
May 22, 2006
1,990
1,444
AFL Club
West Coast
Can't believe that I'm considering not taking 144.
But I will.
Alec Waterman, thanks for not playing, although it's given me Macrae's 23.....

Take Grundys 144 vc score or stick with Gawn as C? 😄

I only ask as my cash league opponent has Gawn as C and if goes 180 + it could be the difference between me winning and losing.
How do you know he won't flip the C onto a donut player? What's the latest donut that he has available?
 

Judd_Magic

Brownlow Medallist
Mar 24, 2008
21,247
43,135
Melbourne
AFL Club
Carlton
Other Teams
Supercoach GRIM REAPER!!!!!
Can't believe that I'm considering not taking 144.
But I will.
Alec Waterman, thanks for not playing, although it's given me Macrae's 23.....



How do you know he won't flip the C onto a donut player? What's the latest donut that he has available?
He has Macrae as his VC.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

JuddgementDay

Norm Smith Medallist
Feb 10, 2010
9,379
11,056
Melbourne
AFL Club
Carlton
Would be insane to not take 144
It really depends what the net result of your loopy.
For me it was either.
Grundy 144 X2 and Rowe 36
or
Captain Gawn X2 and Bergman

I've decided to go with Bergman and hoping that he'll get 70 or so; and he got 76
that's 40 pts difference

So, now my breakeven, is Gawn 104
That's should be pretty easy for Gawn - if he gets any more then I'll be in front

It was risky and it is still risky, but it was worth a shot to captain Gawn!

BTW - I hope I didn't stuff up my maths :p
 

toxic

Hall of Famer
May 9, 2008
41,544
57,786
GONE
AFL Club
Collingwood
It really depends what the net result of your loopy.
For me it was either.
Grundy 144 X2 and Rowe 36
or
Captain Gawn X2 and Bergman

I've decided to go with Bergman and hoping that he'll get 70 or so; and he got 76
that's 40 pts difference

So, now my breakeven, is Gawn 104
That's should be pretty easy for Gawn - if he gets any more then I'll be in front

It was risky and it is still risky, but it was worth a shot to captain Gawn!

BTW - I hope I didn't stuff up my maths :p
Be for gawn is 124 based on the scenario 288 + 36 or Berg plus Gawn2
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

A Bit Dusty

2017🏆2019🏆2020🏆
Oct 6, 2017
4,504
11,723
AFL Club
Richmond
I don't know what to do. I had Grundy Vc and can loop Ziebell with either Waterman or Treacy. Do I take the 144 or hope Gawn goes big?
 

SC fish

Norm Smith Medallist
Apr 5, 2014
7,760
11,634
Adelaide
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
My SuperCoach team
I cant believe people are knocking back 144

You all have rocks in your head. The risk of injury is too great.
Agree, I would have taken it but would also have had to take Rowes 36 as I already had the E on him

Others might not take it if they are doing a Hail Mary to win a H2H
 

SC fish

Norm Smith Medallist
Apr 5, 2014
7,760
11,634
Adelaide
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
My SuperCoach team
It really depends what the net result of your loopy.
For me it was either.
Grundy 144 X2 and Rowe 36
or
Captain Gawn X2 and Bergman

I've decided to go with Bergman and hoping that he'll get 70 or so; and he got 76
that's 40 pts difference

So, now my breakeven, is Gawn 104
That's should be pretty easy for Gawn - if he gets any more then I'll be in front

It was risky and it is still risky, but it was worth a shot to captain Gawn!

BTW - I hope I didn't stuff up my maths :p
Looks like we lost 41 points. Not too concerned - I lose heaps more than that every week playing the wrong rookies on field!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad