stkildathunda
DEMPSTERED
Oops posted in wrong thread. All this talk about who plays on Lynch but no one mentions Rhys Stanley? Isn't he supposed to be our "big defender"? Surely he takes Lynch if he is indeed a defender!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Pardon the intrusion.
Think it should be a cracker of a game. Lets be honest - both teams have had less than an ideal start to 2013. Saints 2-5 and Adelaide 3-4. Our 5 wins combined have come against teams with a combined 6-22 record.
The two sides will be completely from Rd12 in 2012 with the Crows to be without Walker, Tippett, Callinan, Martin, Petrenko, Doughty, Shaw, Jaensch, Knights and the Saints to be without Goddard, Hayes, Kosi, Blake, Gram, Gilbert, Schnieder.
For me the key for us will be Dangerfield. When he has been on song this year, we have looked very good. When he has been off (Essendon/Port games) we looked sluggish and got smashed in the clearances. He is our #1 player by a mile and has really lifted his game over the past 2 weeks. Forget Thompson (has learnt how to deal with the tag) and Sloane (more of a gut runner who will only get 20-25 possies) you need to shut down Danger. He can win the game by himself. Would think you would bring in Clinton Jones - purely so that if Dangerfield gets on top of Geary - you have a quality second option.
The Saints fans questioning where our goals are going to come from are 100% on the money. We realistically have two forwards in our team Jenkins and the out of form Porps (who spends 40% of his time in the middle). Jenkins is still raw. Has lots of potential if you ask me, but his kicking for goal leaves a little to be desired. He will have a couple of games this year where he will kick a bag and make people take notice, but is still pretty far off being a dominant forward. Our other tall forward McKernan hasn't set the world on fire so far in his career. Lynch kicked 9 goals in his first 9 games with us - so really think we need to take his 10 against GWS with a pinch of salt. The rest of our forwards will comprise of resting midfielders.
For me the three biggest concerns are:
1. McEvoy against Sauce. You guys have a genuine superstar in McEvoy. What he has shown as a 200cm ruckman at 23 is pretty special. Hasn't gotten the attention (IMO) of Danger,Cotchin,Rioli from that 2007 draft but could end up as good as the other 3 if he keeps improving. This battle will be huge, especially since Sauce has been so out of touch this year. If Sauce can negate McEvoy I think we will win the midfield battle comfortably however if McEvoy gets on top you will come out ahead in the middle.
2. Sam Fisher. With our dysfunctional forward line, Fishers rebound off half back could really hurt us. Andrew Walker killed us in our loss to Carlton (32 possies). For me - I would like to see Lynch go to him as a defensive forward.
3. Small forwards - I think we have enough options to negate Roo (Rutten/Talia/Otten are all in good form). What worries me are Milne/Saad/Milera. We had Garlett/Yarran/Betts kick 8 between them in our loss to Carlton. We have a couple of small Defenders - Laird & Brown. Both have been playing well considering they have a massive 13 games of AFL experience between them. Hopefully for our chances they can keep your smalls quiet.
It should be a pretty even contest. I think we should win by about 12-18 points, based purely because I feel we have a bit more talent in the middle.
It's absolutely no intrusion with analysis like that, man! Great stuff. Feel welcome.
Dude, it is wet AS here! Will that effect your selections in any way, do you think?
Oops posted in wrong thread. All this talk about who plays on Lynch but no one mentions Rhys Stanley? Isn't he supposed to be our "big defender"? Surely he takes Lynch if he is indeed a defender!
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
He can win the game by himself. Would think you would bring in Clinton Jones - purely so that if Dangerfield gets on top of Geary - you have a quality second option.
Hey guys, long time reader of Bigfooty, first time poster.
While it's important not to get carried away after one good game, there are plenty of reasons to be optimistic about this game.
With all due respect to Tom Lynch, Adelaide doesn't have a 'monster forward' at the moment capable of tearing us apart. Despite the amount of hostility directed towards Stanley on other threads, he's been a solid part of a back line that is really starting to gel.
Dangerfield is a star, but I think the crows are overly reliant on him to spark them into action. Nullifying him with another Geary special will go a long way to winning the game.
Webster deserves a full game after last week's effort. What I love about the kids that we are blooding at the moment is that they are all 'good decision makers'. Ross, Wright, Sipposs, Newnes, all of them refuse to panic in tight spots. I value that trait more than anything else.
Ultimately, across the field, we line up very well.
Plus, playing Adelaide at Football Park gives me another reason to watch highlights of the 2005 Qualifying Final. Hell yes.
Lynch isn't worthy of being given Stanley.Oops posted in wrong thread. All this talk about who plays on Lynch but no one mentions Rhys Stanley? Isn't he supposed to be our "big defender"? Surely he takes Lynch if he is indeed a defender!
Tippet replaced by Lynch<<<<< Kosi replaced by any rookie in the AFL.
More seriously, Fisher hasn't been the rebounder this year. Roberton, Dempster, ( Wright out ) and Geary, but its James Gwilt ( admittedly only 2 games on him ) who tends to average the most rebounds.
Unless you have a pretty buff reverse tagger, Gwilt will be like a Gorilla tagged by a butterfly.
Hasn't played for two weeks will probably get a run in the VFL?Lee isn't on the injury list that you posted Stanley_Knifes.
What do we think? If the game was at Etihad, I would consider playing him as the two-and-a-halved tall (so Roo, Hickey, and him) until Beau comes back. Structurally on a dry pitch, that'd be fine. I could certainly see us playing him in that role when we play Doggies the week after.
But given the wetness of this game, I don't think we need to go in so tall, structurally.
Don't bring up Gwilt. Still remember this unknown player tearing us a new one in the 2005 final (anyone else brings that up again and I bring up 1997).
In all honesty its Gwilt and Fisher who scare me the most. Watched your game on Monday and thought Fisher looked like the Fisher of old (thought he lead in rebound 50's as well for that game). Both have pace, read the game very well and set up a lot of drive off half back.
Hoping I don't overstep my mark, but I am not as concerned with Dempster (think he is a more of a shutdown defender) or Roberton (just don't think he is as damaging as Gwilt or Fisher).
I don't think we can bring in another tall without taking out either Hickey or Siposs. Having two talls, a ruckmen, a medium and three smalls is just too much.
Don't think Thompson, Dangerfield, Sloane etc played in that NAB Cup though. NAB Cup means nothing at allWe came within a kick in both our games there last year and then won against Adelaide comfortably in the NAB Cup, so i don't think it will hold too many fears for us.