Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wouldn't say he had a lot more impact, probably stood out a bit more, sometimes it takes them a while to get going. Sometimes the ball doesn't bounce your way. Crozier is a bit like Walters in that he doesn't need a lot of it to have an impact with his long kicking and good skills. He just doesn't seem to be able to find any space this year. Perhaps because they aren't worrying about what Walters will do! Neale took a while to build this year too but he is such a ball magnet.On Crozier: Really interesting take on differences between expectations for junior footballers and pro footy players and how that relates to him. But how, then, can one explain Crozier having much more impact last year than this year? He was at his best last year against the Western Bulldogs in Rd 2 (he replaced fellow small Ballaz, who was suspended) and was against Collingwood, when he was part of a tag-team with Son-Son. Maybe some of our disappointment comes from his having a great opportunity this year to step in for an injured Son-Son and not seeing him get big results.
On Silvagni: Don't know if I'd classify his inclusion this week as a reward, so much as inclusion by default because both McPharlin and Tanner Smith are both hurt and Ibbo is building match fitness. That said, SCOS did a helluva job a couple of years ago in the elimination final on Tomahawk, so let's hope for a repeat performance!
Sub an
In general I reckon he's actually not too bad apart from loving himself too much and occasionally too zealous with a 50 or something when he gets a bit wound up in the moment.. People also remember any of his errors because of the way he looks and acts makes him a lot more noticeable.To give Razor his credit I haven't noticed him being particularly biased towards or against any teams.
His love for himself outweighs his love of any club in particular, which may actually work in our favour as IP mentioned.
I'm confused about Hill - Goss on Channel 10 is saying Hill is out of the team, and a few people on here are saying he's out... wtf is going on?
Hill was named
I reckon Sutcliffe's tank is fine.OK, I could see that. I'm starting to get a little concerned with Cam Sutcliffe's tank. He thrived as the sub early last year and I noticed last week v Port, there were times Sutty looked positively gassed after long runs, to the point he looked like he really was laboring. Wonder if he's better off subbing? (If there was a head-scratching emoticon, I'd use it here.)
On Crozier: Really interesting take on differences between expectations for junior footballers and pro footy players and how that relates to him. But how, then, can one explain Crozier having much more impact last year than this year? He was at his best last year against the Western Bulldogs in Rd 2 (he replaced fellow small Ballaz, who was suspended) and was against Collingwood, when he was part of a tag-team with Son-Son. Maybe some of our disappointment comes from his having a great opportunity this year to step in for an injured Son-Son and not seeing him get big results.
On Silvagni: Don't know if I'd classify his inclusion this week as a reward, so much as inclusion by default because both McPharlin and Tanner Smith are both hurt and Ibbo is building match fitness. That said, SCOS did a helluva job a couple of years ago in the elimination final on Tomahawk, so let's hope for a repeat performance!
The Geelong back 6 looks a class or two above our forward line on paper, I'm officially nervous
Very, very VERY surprised about Sheridan coming in. I tend to agree that something is still up with Hill and he is being brought in as cover with Ibbotson to play as well.
More and more ducks and drakes from RTB it seems.
No probs with Hill today.Went through a series of KPI runs and then joined in the main session and trained strongly.He did have a full pressure bandage on his calf but didnt show any discomfort
That's even stranger, as he quite clearly had his knee iced after he was subbed off.
I reckon Sutcliffe's tank is fine.
you watch him at the 5 minute mark of the first 1/4 & he will look as if he is blowing hard & his hair is wet with sweat.
I reckon he is just one of those guys who always look like they are labouring.
did you ever see Robert Harvey or Chris Judd when they were waiting for a ballup? they looked like they needed oxygen tanks, only to burst away once play began.
I am not for one second suggesting that Cam is a player like either of those 2 absolute superstars. I am trying to highlight that appearances can be deceiving when it comes to stamina.
Yeh ,Sherrif and I commented on the lack of knee strapping
Absolutely. He is a very good endurance runner, he is always racking up touches through the middle deep into games.Agree with this. In fact I would have thought that it was squeak's tank and his kicking that got him drafted.
https://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/sport/afl/a/12060143/sutcliffe-nearly-at-freo-last-year/
Absolutely. He is a very good endurance runner, he is always racking up touches through the middle deep into games.
Perhaps he is going through some kicking yips but I would say overall its one of his strengths. Makes good decisions and has a penetrating kick.
Very, very VERY surprised about Sheridan coming in. I tend to agree that something is still up with Hill and he is being brought in as cover with Ibbotson to play as well.
More and more ducks and drakes from RTB it seems.
so close!Most likely Dawson & Ibbo in for Clancee & Crozier.
Well that the last time, I am trusting your match reviews!
I don't think RTB plays many ducks and drakes, the team usually lines up as named.
Happy to hear that Mora is now stepping out with the AFL boys at training, his return is getting closer.
Hopefully Sheridan gets the whole game, has great run and link but is not mature enough to offer much as a sub.
s**t yeah no nicholls is a win too...
And I'm not sure which one is Dalgleish so that's better than him sticking out like the dog's proverbials which could only be a negative.