Round 9 Discussion Thread

[Makedonija]

Jack has had a number of free-kicks paid against him that were rubbish. Cost me a good 20-25+ points right there.

 

[Hate]

Saw something about Swan not training this week (not sure if true), but could be the reason why he's sitting down back and up-forward.

Commentators are the biggest wanks trying to find solutions for Collingwood. How about the obvious, chuck swan and pendles on ball.

 

[CACA_TAZZA]

Saw something about Swan not training this week (not sure if true), but could be the reason why he's sitting down back and up-forward.

Commentators are the biggest wanks trying to find solutions for Collingwood. How about the obvious, chuck swan and pendles on ball.

Please tell Bucks that as well

What do you do when your team is down? oh yes, stick your two best midfielders up the fwd line so they could rest for the whole qtr, since there is no chance the ball will ever get there!!! Srsly!

 

[mrpig]

macaffar and kennedy are conjoint twins.

every time kennedy gets the ball, macaffer get +4 hahaha
keep it up

 

[Jcpdragonx]

At least twice a game, McVeigh goes missing.

 

[QS]

Bring in Jack, 57 points.

Bring in Jack, 92 points.

 

[CACA_TAZZA]

If you told me pre-game that Caff would be my highest DT scorer out of Swan/Pendles/JPK/McVeigh, I'd have asked you what have you been smoking mate

 

[QS]

Sick of getting Dwyer and Macaffer, going to have to find a way to upgrade one of them with the spare 130k+ I have. Any damn suggestions?

Rocky?

 

[TheCerealKillee]

Jeez Jack is the new Buddy, 5 FA

 

[QS]

Stupid girl.

 

[QS]

Jeez Jack is the new Buddy, 5 FA

I'm happy I got him to be honest, nice unique.

 

[Makedonija]

Jeez Jack is the new Buddy, 5 FA

I watched the entire game and most of the frees against him were bullshit. Robbed of a good 30+ DT points IMO.

 

[Crawb]

Everyone has Swan and Pendlebury...so not too fussed about their performance. Okay performance from Dwyer...would have liked 70+ though

 

[Dan12]

466/5 with O'Keefe, Jack, Swan, Caff and Dwyer. Stoked with 136 from my unique ROK.

 

[QS]

Jack has had a number of free-kicks paid against him that were rubbish. Cost me a good 20-25+ points right there.

Yep agree. Surprised only 3.5% of teams own him

 

[QS]

Bigfooty crapping its pants again. Time to call it a night.

 

[CaptScott]

Anybody jumping on the Ball train?

 

[Makedonija]

Yep agree. Surprised only 3.5% of teams own him

Yeh mate, he's going to be a great unique pick. His score this week (although good) doesn't reflect his true form. In for some big scores hopefully.

 

[Blue and Gold Blood]

Incorrect. About 1 in 3 teams have Swan. He will be in everyones team though in about 4 rounds time

 

[oddsok]

Just Pendles tonight.

Swan going to be juicy in a few weeks.

 

[horj89]

Very average start with 295 from Pendles, Swan, JPK and Dwyer.

 

[West Coast Weasel]

Grateful I didn't put the C on Swan this week. Didn't have Ball but was impressed watching him play, def an option for next week

 

[nick_martin]

466/5 with O'Keefe, Jack, Swan, Caff and Dwyer. Stoked with 136 from my unique ROK.

Same players but with Pendlebury instead of Jack. 14 tackles from O'Keefe you beauty.

 

[Ball Hog]

381/4

O'Keefe
Pendlebury
Swan
Dwyer

 

[CrozaN]

I also brought in Jack....should have scored 114 if it wasn't for the freaking FA's!! Still happy though!

Jack, Swan, Pendles, Dwyer...344/4.

Is this the first time Swan has had 2 under 100 games in row???