Round 9 Discussion

[CasuallyDressed]

I have 21 players without the BYE.

I think at least 17 of those players will be named this week.

 

[Judd_Magic]

Is 19 players enough for this bye round I should I try and aim for 20?

My 20th would be Webster depending on trades but the way he's been going the last 2 weeks he might not count in my best 18 after all games are completed anyways.

Just asking as I have noticed that a few of my league opponents have 21 players and I feel like I am disadvantaged a bit.

 

[BuddysBuddy23]

22 playing this week. Coll v Adel teams have justified my trading from last week. Decided to move Fas on, had a feeling he wouldn't be right for this week(or in the next few) so decided to downgrade him and get some coin. Also decided to keep Jaensch even though he was injured,had a bye and i had the bare 18 playing.

 

[Spanish Sahara]

22 playing this week. Coll v Adel teams have justified my trading from last week. Decided to move Fas on, had a feeling he wouldn't be right for this week(or in the next few) so decided to downgrade him and get some coin. Also decided to keep Jaensch even though he was injured,had a bye and i had the bare 18 playing.

What happens if Fasolo is a late inclusion

 

[BuddysBuddy23]

What happens if Fasolo is a late inclusion

Could well happen but as a great footballer once had tattooed across his torso-Such Is Life.

 

[JuddgementDay]

Is 19 players enough for this bye round I should I try and aim for 20?

My 20th would be Webster depending on trades but the way he's been going the last 2 weeks he might not count in my best 18 after all games are completed anyways.

Just asking as I have noticed that a few of my league opponents have 21 players and I feel like I am disadvantaged a bit.

19 is enough mate, as long as u dont have too many sub candidates.
Go with ur original trades & get rid of webster. If he scores well this week so be it
trust ur new recruits

 

[KardiniaPark]

I can't stop looking at my team, it's just so so so so great to not have that Canadian prick stinking up my ruck division anymore.

 

[Embleberry]

I can't stop looking at my team, it's just so so so so great to not have that Canadian prick stinking up my ruck division anymore.

What did you do with him? I'm stuck with him atm! Sad times. He's cost me quite a lot of points

 

[Judd_Magic]

19 is enough mate, as long as u dont have too many sub candidates.
Go with ur original trades & get rid of webster. If he scores well this week so be it
trust ur new recruits

All good mate.

Managed to keep Webster around for one more week hoping he can go at least 70 + while still bringing in Pendles and Swallow. Higgins and Polec made way.

 

[rocker_oz33]

I can't stop looking at my team, it's just so so so so great to not have that Canadian prick stinking up my ruck division anymore.

Out Canada In mother Russia.
Goldy locks for you?

 

[Judd_Magic]

Is it worth paying the extra $38,000 for Cam Shenton instead of Hartung?

 

[Da Breust]

Is it worth paying the extra $38,000 for Cam Shenton instead of Hartung?

Yeah it probably is worth paying that extra 38k as I really can't see Hartung playing much longer and even if he does, he won't be earning much cash at all being a sub candidate every week.

 

[SC fish]

Is it worth paying the extra $38,000 for Cam Shenton instead of Hartung?

Not at this stage but IMHO Hartung would be a better choice as he has played one game extra. Neither are worth trading in this week with each having byes to get through before they increase in price.

EDIT - Shenton DPP probably swings things back to even!

 

[SnappyHappy]

If for example Salem came out this week without the vest, scored 90 and rose to 195k, would anyone still entertain him as an option after his bye? Or too expensive? Is this week the week to get on? He's 172k

 

[SC fish]

If for example Salem came out this week without the vest, scored 90 and rose to 195k, would anyone still entertain him as an option after his bye? Or too expensive? Is this week the week to get on? He's 172k

For mine I've had enough of expensive (i.e. more than base price) rookies this season and Salem at $195k - or his current price of 172K - would fall into that category.

 

[toxic]

If for example Salem came out this week without the vest, scored 90 and rose to 195k, would anyone still entertain him as an option after his bye? Or too expensive? Is this week the week to get on? He's 172k

If the above occurred then yes I'd consider him

 

[keithrichards]

I should have 7 out of 8 playing in my forward line this week. Is the emergency loophole possible in the bye rounds? Ie if Ambrose scores well, swing Higgins noto the field for JKH?

 

[KardiniaPark]

Out Canada In mother Russia.
Goldy locks for you?

Yup.

What did you do with him? I'm stuck with him atm! Sad times. He's cost me quite a lot of points

As above, find the money from somewhere. I understand holding Mumford, I don't understand holding Pyke for 60's when he eventually does return.

 

[LivDeeVic]

I should have 7 out of 8 playing in my forward line this week. Is the emergency loophole possible in the bye rounds? Ie if Ambrose scores well, swing Higgins noto the field for JKH?

As I understand it yes. It's your best 18 scores inc any emergencies that play

 

[pincrusher]

Geez it's going to be a boring weekend for me this weekend. 9 of my 21 starters this weekend are playing tonight!!

 

[toxic]

As I understand it yes. It's your best 18 scores inc any emergencies that play

emergencies ONLY count if you have a zero on the field.

pretty sure it is your best 18 players considered to be on the field. Eg: your best 18 cannot include 6 fwds all scoring + 2 bench fwds scoring. The only scores that count from this scenario is the 6 on the field

 

[toxic]

Geez it's going to be a boring weekend for me this weekend. 9 of my 21 starters this weekend are playing tonight!!

9 tonight....

wow - 6 premiums? Swan, pendles,beams, danger, jacobs, sloane

 

[pincrusher]

9 tonight....

wow - 6 premiums? Swan, pendles,beams, danger, jacobs, sloane

Pies: Pendles, Swan, Beams, Landon, Elliott
Crows: Danger, Jacobs, Crouch, Smith

 

[BuddysBuddy23]

Just Pendles(VC),Swan,Beams,Danger,Jacobs,Jaensch and Langdon for me tonight. GO BOYS!!!!

 

[pincrusher]

Would be tempted to throw the VC to Jacobs tonight up against Grundy, but I'll probably play it safe and go Pendles.