Remove this Banner Ad

Round 9 Discussion

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bet we don't see it round 11.
Maybe in the vent thread.
This year I'm a firm believer in #FTB so can't really vent

But I will still enjoy venting in round 11, can't wait.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Nope, it was mainly Daniher.



I was at the game and Stewart looked quite good last week and Essendons forward line on the whole functioned quite well. From the games I saw earlier in the year Hooker has looked totally lost when he was playing the forward role. I think his JS will be fine, but I thought the same with Aaron Black when I bought him in :'(

This is not totally SC relevant, but I very much disagree with this. Hooker has kicked 14 goals (ie, just under 2 per game) playing the deep forward role (ie, out of the goal square). This has been so important for our structure as it has allowed JD to roam beyond the arc where he is the most dangerous (and the most accurate). Hooker is a key to our structure and will stay forward.

Stewart's job security will depend in part on his form (obviously) and our structure. He had a good start and I expect will be retained this week. However, I expect that our forward structure will be a week to week proposition and if Woosh thinks we are too tall then Stewart may the one to go (which is likely why he did not play a game until last week despite good form in the 2s). Our medium sized forwards; Langford, Francis and, once he has returned from injury, Laverde may be preferred over Stewart for certain games.
 
This is not totally SC relevant, but I very much disagree with this. Hooker has kicked 14 goals (ie, just under 2 per game) playing the deep forward role (ie, out of the goal square). This has been so important for our structure as it has allowed JD to roam beyond the arc where he is the most dangerous (and the most accurate). Hooker is a key to our structure and will stay forward.

Stewart's job security will depend in part on his form (obviously) and our structure. He had a good start and I expect will be retained this week. However, I expect that our forward structure will be a week to week proposition and if Woosh thinks we are too tall then Stewart may the one to go (which is likely why he did not play a game until last week despite good form in the 2s). Our medium sized forwards; Langford, Francis and, once he has returned from injury, Laverde may be preferred over Stewart for certain games.

Why would you say such hurtful things
 
its just SC related rage and should be taken in that context.
there's nothing personal or football related on these boards. i know some of it is still kinda douchey but its harmless.

Yeah I disagree.
 
This is not totally SC relevant, but I very much disagree with this. Hooker has kicked 14 goals (ie, just under 2 per game) playing the deep forward role (ie, out of the goal square). This has been so important for our structure as it has allowed JD to roam beyond the arc where he is the most dangerous (and the most accurate). Hooker is a key to our structure and will stay forward.

Stewart's job security will depend in part on his form (obviously) and our structure. He had a good start and I expect will be retained this week. However, I expect that our forward structure will be a week to week proposition and if Woosh thinks we are too tall then Stewart may the one to go (which is likely why he did not play a game until last week despite good form in the 2s). Our medium sized forwards; Langford, Francis and, once he has returned from injury, Laverde may be preferred over Stewart for certain games.

Fair point but to me (from the few times I've seen Essendon this year) he gets caught out of position a fair bit.

You'd think that on recent form and structure that Daniher, McTip, Oraaaaazio and Green are rock solid certain starters, which leaves room for another rotating midfielder/high half forward and/or a another tall mobile sized forward.

Do you think Ambrose would also be in the mix for that spot when he comes back from injury?
 
Anyone else forward line have all 4 of Butler (Out), Balic (Out), Parsons (???), Eddy (R.I.P)?

God damn graveyard.......looking at potentially 2 0's if Parsons is dropped.....wtf!
Houston (bye), Eddy (bye), Butler (injury), Hannan (sh1t truck probably get dropped), Parsons (sh1t truck probably get dropped), Cameron (sh1t truck will never play)
 
Houston (bye), Eddy (bye), Butler (injury), Hannan (sh1t truck probably get dropped), Parsons (sh1t truck probably get dropped), Cameron (sh1t truck will never play)
That's a fair list.
You poor bugger!
Going early on stewart could just add to it.
Idk wtf I would do.
Start an afl fantasy team?
 
Houston (bye), Eddy (bye), Butler (injury), Hannan (sh1t truck probably get dropped), Parsons (sh1t truck probably get dropped), Cameron (sh1t truck will never play)
Had and traded, had and traded, dont have, didnt want, perm bench, no way.

I feel a lot better now.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

That's a fair list.
You poor bugger!
Going early on stewart could just add to it.
Idk wtf I would do.
Start an afl fantasy team?
Not a bad idea. I've pretty much braced myself on copping 2 donuts this week. Have Yeo in the mids and Nank covering in ruck this week so next week won't be *as* bad (will still need to field Parsons or Hannan at F6 next week :S)
 
With Treloar Beams Green back this week I'll have 29 playing. Thats almost TOO many as no loophole emergencies.

How long do you think before we target 26 man squads and 4 $102k Strandica-types not taking up $ and playing the loophole role? I reckon just after byes.
 
fair enough.
im not gonna tell you what to think.

Best response you could have given.

For the record, I've been a bit disappointed in this board for a long time, but I've held my tongue because you know, "it takes time".

But when you hear a player is out for personal reasons and super quick someone says "he needed time to come out" and then bam! "gay bar photo".

Seriously? first up, give the kid a break ... and second "oh **** yeah the gay jokes."

Are we really that immature? I guess we are.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Best response you could have given.

For the record, I've been a bit disappointed in this board for a long time, but I've held my tongue because you know, "it takes time".

But when you hear a player is out for personal reasons and super quick someone says "he needed time to come out" and then bam! "gay bar photo".

Seriously? first up, give the kid a break ... and second "oh **** yeah the gay jokes."

Are we really that immature? I guess we are.

It's just the internet. Go and have a bex and a lie down.
 
Best response you could have given.

For the record, I've been a bit disappointed in this board for a long time, but I've held my tongue because you know, "it takes time".

But when you hear a player is out for personal reasons and super quick someone says "he needed time to come out" and then bam! "gay bar photo".

Seriously? first up, give the kid a break ... and second "oh **** yeah the gay jokes."

Are we really that immature? I guess we are.
Mate go to the freo board and see the insults they dish out about us, Balic took time off for personal reasons , nothing wrong with a bit of jovial speculation when we don't know yet if it's for anything bad he's taken the leave.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom