Teams Round 9 teams (MBR 2)

[Mattrox]

Sneaky tactic. I can't even work out what's going on in our match without getting a calculator out.

Checked the SC rules, emergencies def count.

Yep re-read them too just now. I think I read best 18 then ignored everything else after.

 

[GOAUS!]

Sneaky tactic. I can't even work out what's going on in our match without getting a calculator out.

Checked the SC rules, emergencies def count.

Really? Emergencies count in the best 18?

 

[rocker_oz33]

Really? Emergencies count in the best 18?

Best 18 scores inc emg Pretty sure thats how it works.

 

[GOAUS!]

Best 18 scores inc emg Pretty sure thats how it works.

Even if you say have 6 playing on field in the forwards and 1 forward emergency? Might help me next week.

 

[rocker_oz33]

Even if you say have 6 playing on field in the forwards and 1 forward emergency? Might help me next week.

Think so.best 18 scores even if you have 8 forwards playing. pretty sure someone will let us know other wise.

 

[bergerson33]

This is with the trades I plan on doing included, not 100% on them yet but will be around the mark.

Backs: Hibberd, Swallow, Langdon, Gardiner, Aylett or Tippett, Georgio (if named)
Mids: Ablett, Swan, S.Johnson, Watson, Beams, Crouch, Acres, Hartung or Salem
Ruck: Sandilands
Forwards: Dangerfield, Parker, Pavlich, Martin, Lloyd, Ambrose

20-21 playing. Pretty happy with that considering I could reach 1750 this week (1625 with K.Simpson and Acres to come tonight).

 

[Jiska]

Even if you say have 6 playing on field in the forwards and 1 forward emergency? Might help me next week.

Nope, doesn't work that way. Emergencies still only count if you have a non-playing player on the field, same as every other week.

On the big black bar above your team on the site, at the end is "click here for more information". Click there and it explains it pretty well.

 

[GOAUS!]

Nope, doesn't work that way. Emergencies still only count if you have a non-playing player on the field, same as every other week.

On the big black bar above your team on the site, at the end is "click here for more information". Click there and it explains it pretty well.

Yeah I thought that was the case. I was getting hopeful.

 

[goondog]

Planning to bring in Jelwood and Bartel for Laidler and Polec this week but I'll still end up one short (unless Fasolo plays)

Def: McVeigh, Johnson, Bartel, Swallow, Langdon
Mid: Ablett, Beams, Jack, Jelwood, Mundy, Crouch
Ruck: Sandilands
Fwd: Dangerfield, Parker, Martin, Ambrose, Lloyd

edit: WTF, I had it in my head that Brisbane was also a R9 bye. Can add Hanley, Taylor, Robertson and Gardiner which leaves me with too many

 

[Mercuri Rising]

D: McVeigh, Swallow, Bartel, Enright, Langdon, McDonald
M: Ablett, Pendles, Beams, SJ, JPK, Goddard, Mundy, Tyson
R: Sandilands, Ryder
F: Danger, Pav, Martin, Zorko, Ambrose, Lloyd

Anyone reckon I'd have a remote chance at the weekly if a few of those mercurial forwards fire? Going a week late on Acres so I can have a crack.

 

[stevebbb]

I might keep Robertson instead of Taylor... I think if Robertson starts he will make more money and score more than Taylor.
I'll make my final trade when I know who the starting sub is for the Lions

 

[Daniels]

Confident this is side pending my trades. Look to be running 19, but 21-22 would be nice!

Georgiou prob back in. Ashby doubtful. Fas would be bloody handy. I think Ambrose definitely holds spot with Chappy out. Robertson, Acres and JKH I figure should be fine.

 

[leng jai]

Just noticed I have 23 player this week...might have to rethink my trades.

 

[Super Hans]

That's if I do my planed trades this week...

 

[leng jai]

After using 2 trades this week:

DEF: Hibberd, Swallow, Langdon, Laidler, McVeigh, Cutler

MID: Ablett, Pendlebury, Watson, Beams, SJ, Acres, Robertson, L. Taylor

RUCK: Sandilands, Dericx

FWD: Dangerfield, Fasolo, Martin, Lloyd, JKH, Ambrose

Good enough with 4 spare players.

 

[Judd_Magic]

Should have 19 available this week which is ok.

Brought Swallow and Pendles in and flowered off Webster which felt amazingly good!

 

[Mercuri Rising]

Should have 19 available this week which is ok.

Brought Swallow and Pendles in and flowered off Webster which felt amazingly good!

View attachment 56426

Good riddance.

 

[CotchyPls]

Going to have to make up my points lost with RD 9 & 10, hopefully.

 

[CasuallyDressed]

I should be more than fine this week. I'll have 18 easily.

The next week? It could get bad.

 

[Mercuri Rising]

Changed my trade-ins from SJ and Goddard to Rockliff and Swan (Mitchell and Roughead out). Just going for the R9 weekly as I've been bleating about in every thread. Small chance of chucking NDS in over Swan.

 

[Mantastic]

I feel like I'm the opposite of everyone. I only have 14 players this week. Potentially 16 depending on guys like Currie. Might need to make a trade or two but I'm happy with the quality of most of the guys that will be starting.

 

[stevebbb]

I might keep Robertson instead of Taylor... I think if Robertson starts he will make more money and score more than Taylor.
I'll make my final trade when I know who the starting sub is for the Lions

with Jaensch no longer injured, I can add him to my backline
assuming everybody is selected, I will have 22 players spread evenly on all lines

 

[AngryRanga]

About 180k left in the bank to say goodbye to Tyson next week. Looking good for this week

 

[Donakebab]

McVeigh - D.Swallow - Langdon - Laidler - McDonald
Ablett - Pendlebury - Beams - Crouch - Robertson - Acres
Sandilands - Longer
Parker - Dangerfield - Zorko - B.Harvey - Lloyd - Ambrose (Fasolo)

One trade left for the week. Might be used in the backline on Laidler or McDonald, but overall happy with the fielded team this week.

 

[bananatigz]

Swallow, Enright, Langdon, Cutler
Ablett, Pendlebury, Watson, Beams, Cotchin, Tyson, Crouch, Acres (Robertson)
Sandilands, Currie?
Dangerfield, Parker, Martin, Pavlich, Lloyd, Ambrose

Probably 19 don't think Currie will play, but will have 19-20 next week as well which i'm happy about, sounds like some might struggle