MVP Round1; GC vs. Essendon

[VelvetSledge]

5. Zaharakis
4. Parish
3. Z. Merrett
2. Stokes
1. Gleeson

 

[BomberTime]

5. Zaka
4. Parish
3. Z Merrett
2. Stokes
1. Kelly

 

[bombre-boy]

5. D.Zaharakis
4. Z.Merrett
3. M.Stokes
2. D.Parish
1. J.Kelly

 

[eDPS]

5. Zaharakis
4. Z.Merrett
3. Stokes
2. Parish
1. Kelly

 

[Lore]

 

[Harlequin]

5. Zaharakis
4. Parish
3. Zerrett
2. Stokes
1. Kelly

 

[efcboy]

5. Zaharakis
4. Zerrett
3. Parish
2. Leuenberger
1. Kelly

 

[pazza]

5 - Zaharakis
4 - Parish
3 - Stokes
2 - Z. Merrett
1 - Daniher

 

[The Bomb]

5. Zaharakis
4. Z. Merrett
3. Parish
2. Stokes
1. Kelly

 

[expires]

5/ Zaharakis

4/ Goddard

3 Z Merret

2/ Leuenberger

1/ Baguley

 

[AlexEss]

5. Zaharakis
4. Baguley
3. Zerret
2. Stokes
1. Parish

 

[DERO]

5. Zaharakis
4. The good Merrett
3. Parish
2. Stokes
1. Gwilt

 

[yaco55]

Coaches Votes

10 - Hall
8 - Ablett
5 - Lynch
5 - Zaharakis
1 - May
1 - Malceski

Surprised Hall was rated above Ablett.

 

[Mr Mojo Risin]

5. Zaharakis
4. Z.Merrett
3. Stokes
2. Parish
1. Gwilt

 

[Whispering_Jack]

5. Zaharakis
4. Z.Merrett
3. Stokes
2. Parish
1. Gwilt

This

 

[DapperDon]

5. Zaka
4. Z.Merrett
3. Parish
2. Stokes
1. Gwilt

 

[monty1104]

5. Zaka
4. Z. Merrett
3. Stokes
2. Parish
1. Leuenberger.

 

[Donakebab]

Just shows that the AFL Player Ratings are quite often rubbish.

 

[Lore]

Just shows that the AFL Player Ratings are quite often rubbish.

If you ignore the GC players, it seems to get ours approximately in order.

 

[Donakebab]

If you ignore the GC players, it seems to get ours approximately in order.

With some glaring differences like Goddard our third best.

 

[eth-dog]

Ambrose had negative impact?