Mister Carlton
Better than you.
Shhh.. don’t spoil the party.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Someone explain to me why St.Kilda are chasing TDK when Marshall is the better player and TDK being no certainty to be better than him in the future.
Not to mention shelling out 1.8 million for a ruckman just isn't worth it. Richmond won multiple premierships with Nankervis, Hawthorn with McEvoy, Collingwood with Cameron and most recently, Brisbane with Fort. Gawn would be the only genuine superstar ruck to have won a premiership in recent times.
FWIW I'd be fine if we just dropped the TDK offer right now. I also don't think Marshall will leave.Someone explain to me why St.Kilda are chasing TDK when Marshall is the better player and TDK being no certainty to be better than him in the future.
Not to mention shelling out 1.8 million for a ruckman just isn't worth it. Richmond won multiple premierships with Nankervis, Hawthorn with McEvoy, Collingwood with Cameron and most recently, Brisbane with Fort. Gawn would be the only genuine superstar ruck to have won a premiership in recent times.
Someone explain to me why St.Kilda are chasing TDK when Marshall is the better player and TDK being no certainty to be better than him in the future.
Salary cap space to burn.Not to mention shelling out 1.8 million for a ruckman just isn't worth it. Richmond won multiple premierships with Nankervis, Hawthorn with McEvoy, Collingwood with Cameron and most recently, Brisbane with Fort. Gawn would be the only genuine superstar ruck to have won a premiership in recent times.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Bringing up the age thing and how TDK fits better into your finals window, I am on board with but I think if you get TDK, playing both Marshall and TDK is a waste of resources. When have 2 A grade rucks played their best football in the same team together? In recent times, we've seen Gawn and Grundy fail, Fremantle seem to play better with Jackson as their sole ruck....I know Marshall has much better forward craft but I think his talents around the ball is wasted if he plays predominantly forward.FWIW I'd be fine if we just dropped the TDK offer right now. I also don't think Marshall will leave.
Marshall might be better but he's not getting any younger. He's kind of a strange ruck in that he hasn't ever been good at winning taps but is excellent as an interceptor, tall target and fourth midfielder. While these are all extremely valuable skills his inability to win taps doesn't make it easy for our midfield, which is already thin, to get on top in games.
Bringing up the age thing and how TDK fits better into your finals window, I am on board with but I think if you get TDK, playing both Marshall and TDK is a waste of resources. When have 2 A grade rucks played their best football in the same team together? In recent times, we've seen Gawn and Grundy fail, Fremantle seem to play better with Jackson as their sole ruck....I know Marshall has much better forward craft but I think his talents around the ball is wasted if he plays predominantly forward.
The only way I'd agree with St.Kilda chasing TDK is if they can trade Marshall out for something really good.
As I’ve mentioned a bunch of times in here, we were a considerably better team when we had both Ro and Ryder playing together (including winning our only final in the last 15 years, and our winning percentage was significantly higher when we had them both playing, once Paddy got up to speed), but if we have both playing, it leaves no room for Keeler, Dodson, Dodson, or Heath (who have all shown something in the seniors this last few months), nor possibly Tauru up there, if Aleer pushes him out of the backline.Bringing up the age thing and how TDK fits better into your finals window, I am on board with but I think if you get TDK, playing both Marshall and TDK is a waste of resources. When have 2 A grade rucks played their best football in the same team together? In recent times, we've seen Gawn and Grundy fail, Fremantle seem to play better with Jackson as their sole ruck....I know Marshall has much better forward craft but I think his talents around the ball is wasted if he plays predominantly forward.
The only way I'd agree with St.Kilda chasing TDK is if they can trade Marshall out for something really good.
Stop it, Chris Scott is in love enoughFWIW I'd be fine if we just dropped the TDK offer right now. I also don't think Marshall will leave.
Marshall might be better but he's not getting any younger. He's kind of a strange ruck in that he hasn't ever been good at winning taps but is excellent as an interceptor, tall target and fourth midfielder. While these are all extremely valuable skills his inability to win taps doesn't make it easy for our midfield, which is already thin, to get on top in games.
As I’ve mentioned a bunch of times in here, we were a considerably better team when we had both Ro and Ryder playing together (including winning our only final in the last 15 years, and our winning percentage was significantly higher when we had them both playing, once Paddy got up to speed), but if we have both playing, it leaves no room for Keeler, Dodson, Dodson, or Heath (who have all shown something in the seniors this last few months), nor possibly Tauru up there, if Aleer pushes him out of the backline.
Old mate talking waaaaay to much sense for this place.
- TDK 4 years younger than RoMo and costs no draft capital
- Marshall can then be traded for a first round pick
- they have salary cap space to burn
- They have a bunch of decent kids in the 18-22 years old bracket, a ruckman a 3-4 years older fits their age profile for a prolonged stint at finals while Dodson/Heath develop as the next in line, giving those next ruckmen 5-6 years to come of age.
Salary cap space to burn.
If they trade Marshall the end result is:
+TDK and a first round pick
-1.8mil salary cap space(that they didnt need as their bigger targets fell through) and Marshall
Pick purchasing
Landing TDK at the cattery is a very Geelong thing to do. If, as rumoured the Saints are looking to renegoiate our offer, it might just happen. Either way, I reckon the Blues want him gone for the compo pick.Stop it, Chris Scott is in love enough
- TDK 4 years younger than RoMo and costs no draft capital
- Marshall can then be traded for a first round pick
- they have salary cap space to burn
- They have a bunch of decent kids in the 18-22 years old bracket, a ruckman a 3-4 years older fits their age profile for a prolonged stint at finals while Dodson/Heath develop as the next in line, giving those next ruckmen 5-6 years to come of age.
Salary cap space to burn.
If they trade Marshall the end result is:
+TDK and a first round pick
-1.8mil salary cap space(that they didnt need as their bigger targets fell through) and Marshall
Pick purchasing
TDK would be great but I was talking about Marshall.Landing TDK at the cattery is a very Geelong thing to do. If, as rumoured the Saints are looking to renegoiate our offer, it might just happen. Either way, I reckon the Blues want him gone for the compo pick.
I know. Just saying that all the talk is RoMa to your club, but wouldn't surprise me if TDK landed there instead. Just like Buddy was locked in at GWS.TDK would be great but I was talking about Marshall.
An ex saint drafted as a FF, converted to ruck but can't win the hit outs? Shut up and give that man a farm
Yeah tdk is fine too i guess (insert spoiled child grunting sounds here)I know. Just saying that all the talk is RoMa to your club, but wouldn't surprise me if TDK landed there instead. Just like Buddy was locked in at GWS.
TDK would be great but I was talking about Marshall.
An ex saint drafted as a FF, converted to ruck but can't win the hit outs? Shut up and give that man a farm
Let's invite Kozzy Pickett to Roma's farm in a couple of yearsI would loveRhys StanleyRowan Marshall

He's not going to look for a trade imo. He's looking for rucking relief and saints have tried many in the position.
I don't know. Under Ross Lyon he had Michael Gardiner and Steven King.Bringing up the age thing and how TDK fits better into your finals window, I am on board with but I think if you get TDK, playing both Marshall and TDK is a waste of resources. When have 2 A grade rucks played their best football in the same team together? In recent times, we've seen Gawn and Grundy fail, Fremantle seem to play better with Jackson as their sole ruck....I know Marshall has much better forward craft but I think his talents around the ball is wasted if he plays predominantly forward.
The only way I'd agree with St.Kilda chasing TDK is if they can trade Marshall out for something really good.
Have you guys given any thought to playing him as a Blicavs-style tall utility who chops out in the ruck occassionally but isn't the main ruckman?FWIW I'd be fine if we just dropped the TDK offer right now. I also don't think Marshall will leave.
Marshall might be better but he's not getting any younger. He's kind of a strange ruck in that he hasn't ever been good at winning taps but is excellent as an interceptor, tall target and fourth midfielder. While these are all extremely valuable skills his inability to win taps doesn't make it easy for our midfield, which is already thin, to get on top in games.
Don't know. I'd like to see him in that role though, it'd be a huge win if we could keep him and have him play like that.Have you guys given any thought to playing him as a Blicavs-style tall utility who chops out in the ruck occassionally but isn't the main ruckman?
Does he have the tank?
Have you guys given any thought to playing him as a Blicavs-style tall utility who chops out in the ruck occassionally but isn't the main ruckman?
Does he have the tank?