- Dec 27, 2016
- 26,781
- 56,724
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #1,426
Why was he in in the first place? Would you accept that if the law was changed and unethically gained evidence was allowed in court, that he should have been found guilty?
From this article, police are stating they acted in good faith (maybe not) and are very disappointed with the quashing of Orman's conviction and prosecutors say there is enough other evidence to get a conviction. What is it? Not enough because they've let him out free to sue the state for more money than it would cost to send him to trial again imo.
Sounds like they're saving face and in damage control to me, what else are they going to say? 'Oh .. well we knew we were probably doing the wrong thing but went ahead anyway ... the streets were awash with blood!'
Behind the gangland hit Faruk Orman was convicted of, then acquitted
Victor George Peirce was shot through the window of his 1993 maroon Commodore on Port Melbourne's Bay Street in 2002.
www.theage.com.au