- Aug 1, 2008
- 15,149
- 25,675
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Banned
- #1
I believe we should be trying to maximize the best aspects of the game whilst simplifying the rules for everyone to understand. There is far too much unnecessary guesswork in adjudicating the rules. Whereever possible we should not be asking umpries determine intention - it is an impossible task.
Below are my solutions to areas of the game I find frustrating and/or insane.
20-meter kick to award a mark
This retention passing game is dull. 15 meters retention passes are a blight on the game. 15-meter kick is impossible to defend and serve merely delay action. Often umpires are paying 12 or 12 meter kicks. 20 meters would make simple retention much more difficult. We would see more conntested marks and faster ball movement and play.
Penalize all kicks that travel Out of bounds - on the full or after a bounce -
(only if the ball is touched prior to crossing the line is it a ball up - like the rule we had for a kick out following a behind)
no more asking umpires to be psychic to determine whether a kick out of bounds is deliberate or not. There are just too many embarrassing inconsistencies with this deliberate rule. If a kick results in crossing the boundary line - whether it bounces or not - it is a free-kick to the opposing team. There is no negative consequence to this change. It is a rare no brainer. It would reduce unnecessary stoppage, keep the ball in play, and add a new level of excitement.
I'm am not sure whether we go the full hog with the last touch rule - but this is a no brainer.
No Prior Opportunity
At least 10-20 times a game, a player will take possession with both hands when it is apparent they will be tackled by 2-3 opponents. We then all suffer have to suffer the pantomime of the player trying to dispose of the ball until the umpire inevitably calls a ball up. It is not in the spirit of a fair contest. Prior opportunity is a rule that began in under 12s and was championed by the AFL in the 1980s to help attract Rugby followers to the Sydney Swans. Inevitably, tackles have dramatically increased over the decades since. And tackles create stoppages.
If we want quick ball movement, high scoring, and exciting play all you need do is remove the prior opportunity crutch. Tackles will decrease substantially. Therefore reducing stoppages and concussions.
Advantage Play-On
In Rugby Union the referee Signals advantage without blowing a whistle. Only, if the next sequence proves to be not advantageous is a whistle blown and the ball returned to the penalty spot. I can't see why this would not work much better in our game. Once the whistle is blown the momentum of the game has been altered. This small change would make play more continuous.
Mark/Free Exclusion Zone - Ease-up
Can we exercise some sense here and not give 50 metre penalties unless there is real inteference.
Can we also have an exclusion zone for the player on the mark - this shepherding of the guy on the mark just looks like cheating and adds nothing to the game.
Goal Review - Delays
Where a goal umpire calls a goal there is no need to wait for a review - the ball goes straight to the middle - a quiet review is conducted after every goal anyway
If there is an over-rule it is called prior to the next centre bounce.
Only where the goal-umpire thinks it is a point but has some doubt is a review required prior to the re-commencement of play.
Below are my solutions to areas of the game I find frustrating and/or insane.
20-meter kick to award a mark
This retention passing game is dull. 15 meters retention passes are a blight on the game. 15-meter kick is impossible to defend and serve merely delay action. Often umpires are paying 12 or 12 meter kicks. 20 meters would make simple retention much more difficult. We would see more conntested marks and faster ball movement and play.
Penalize all kicks that travel Out of bounds - on the full or after a bounce -
(only if the ball is touched prior to crossing the line is it a ball up - like the rule we had for a kick out following a behind)
no more asking umpires to be psychic to determine whether a kick out of bounds is deliberate or not. There are just too many embarrassing inconsistencies with this deliberate rule. If a kick results in crossing the boundary line - whether it bounces or not - it is a free-kick to the opposing team. There is no negative consequence to this change. It is a rare no brainer. It would reduce unnecessary stoppage, keep the ball in play, and add a new level of excitement.
I'm am not sure whether we go the full hog with the last touch rule - but this is a no brainer.
No Prior Opportunity
At least 10-20 times a game, a player will take possession with both hands when it is apparent they will be tackled by 2-3 opponents. We then all suffer have to suffer the pantomime of the player trying to dispose of the ball until the umpire inevitably calls a ball up. It is not in the spirit of a fair contest. Prior opportunity is a rule that began in under 12s and was championed by the AFL in the 1980s to help attract Rugby followers to the Sydney Swans. Inevitably, tackles have dramatically increased over the decades since. And tackles create stoppages.
If we want quick ball movement, high scoring, and exciting play all you need do is remove the prior opportunity crutch. Tackles will decrease substantially. Therefore reducing stoppages and concussions.
Advantage Play-On
In Rugby Union the referee Signals advantage without blowing a whistle. Only, if the next sequence proves to be not advantageous is a whistle blown and the ball returned to the penalty spot. I can't see why this would not work much better in our game. Once the whistle is blown the momentum of the game has been altered. This small change would make play more continuous.
Mark/Free Exclusion Zone - Ease-up
Can we exercise some sense here and not give 50 metre penalties unless there is real inteference.
Can we also have an exclusion zone for the player on the mark - this shepherding of the guy on the mark just looks like cheating and adds nothing to the game.
Goal Review - Delays
Where a goal umpire calls a goal there is no need to wait for a review - the ball goes straight to the middle - a quiet review is conducted after every goal anyway
If there is an over-rule it is called prior to the next centre bounce.
Only where the goal-umpire thinks it is a point but has some doubt is a review required prior to the re-commencement of play.