Remove this Banner Ad

Rumour Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Matz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

dont you wish you were a fly on the wall in this trade season to hear the truth on what deals are being done, and what mr hine and bucks are thinking?
 
ullrich said:
shaw is out cos he to old now but when u win a flag its the best piss up party in ur life and u want to go back to back when u play at a high level so he will end he's days at the swans, if there was a slim chance of anything it would be that ried wants to play with he's brother is only option it would be done with a first rounder or something sweet for them, but we will see what happends at end of this trade season, but what do use guys think what is sydney going to do play two ruckman in pyke, mummy, tippet and reid all in one side, to top heavey you would think speacialy with lrt in there to?
Click to expand...

It would have to be a very, very good first rounder or something very, very sweet.
You mean a ruckman, resting ruckman, FF, CHF and Tall utility able to play third tall/CHB/relieving ruck if injury occurs? I'd say we would have a function spine flexible enough to cover injuries.
 
Membling said:
It would have to be a very, very good first rounder or something very, very sweet.
You mean a ruckman, resting ruckman, FF, CHF and Tall utility able to play third tall/CHB/relieving ruck if injury occurs? I'd say we would have a function spine flexible enough to cover injuries.
Click to expand...

I would expect that Tippet would mean that they no longer would play 2 genuine ruckmen
 
sr36 said:
I would expect that Tippet would mean that they no longer would play 2 genuine ruckmen
Click to expand...
Depends how we line up and if we scrap Tippett's ruck forays. Also wouldn't be a bad ploy to rotate Mumford, Pyke and Seaby between forward, ruck and Bench. Fresher players through the ruck isnt a bad thing
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Membling said:
Depends how we line up and if we scrap Tippett's ruck forays. Also wouldn't be a bad ploy to rotate Mumford, Pyke and Seaby between forward, ruck and Bench. Fresher players through the ruck isnt a bad thing
Click to expand...
free's the goodes up to run around the mid and bacl and half foward flank to win brownelow, it should be interesting anyway to see what players everyone have after the trade to get an idea what the teams will look like. all i can say is congrats to rhys shaw a long hard deseverd reward for your footy over the years.
 
Membling said:
Depends how we line up and if we scrap Tippett's ruck forays. Also wouldn't be a bad ploy to rotate Mumford, Pyke and Seaby between forward, ruck and Bench. Fresher players through the ruck isnt a bad thing
Click to expand...


That'll be a bit difficult when you've delisted Seaby.
 
The reality of this is that we are not going to get a first round pick for Wellingham or Dawes, if they end up in the PSD, they will get to their club of choice as per with the Luke Ball situation.
 
chrisaaa said:
The reality of this is that we are not going to get a first round pick for Wellingham or Dawes, if they end up in the PSD, they will get to their club of choice as per with the Luke Ball situation.
Click to expand...

I think a 1st round has already been offered for Wellers. And Dawes wouldn't go the PSD route.
 
chrisaaa said:
The reality of this is that we are not going to get a first round pick for Wellingham or Dawes, if they end up in the PSD, they will get to their club of choice as per with the Luke Ball situation.
Click to expand...
Dawes cant go the PSD route because he is still contracted. I think that you will find that we will easily get a first round pick for both. Wellingham wont be able to go through the PSD either because Melbourne could afford the price that he puts on his head to try to get to West Coast and he doesnt want to go to Melbourne. Is it school holidays time?
 
chrisaaa said:
The reality of this is that we are not going to get a first round pick for Wellingham or Dawes, if they end up in the PSD, they will get to their club of choice as per with the Luke Ball situation.
Click to expand...
You have absolutely no clue. You think Wellingham would last until the team which finished 5th on the ladder...
 
Vod Ka Nockers said:
Dawes cant go the PSD route because he is still contracted. I think that you will find that we will easily get a first round pick for both. Wellingham wont be able to go through the PSD either because Melbourne could afford the price that he puts on his head to try to get to West Coast and he doesnt want to go to Melbourne. Is it school holidays time?
Click to expand...
You can put a price that says unrealistically 1.5 mill a season. Obviously he has agreed to West Coast to pay him a lot less than that, so no other club will touch him.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

GreekLunatic said:
this is what the age wrote about clinton young

Clinton Young is a restricted free agent who is yet to decide whether to remain at the Hawks, where he has been offered a new contract, albeit on what are believed to be slightly reduced terms. It is understood he toured the Westpac Centre with Collingwood officials last night.


Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/lake-to-help-hawks-shore-up-defence-20121008-278w1.html#ixzz28kO896BG
Click to expand...
Wicked. I rate him highly and if we were able to get him running off the HBF or wing!!!
 
Shade said:
Thanks for that.

Interesting i know young is soft but he does have a excellent foot skills.

kinda torn on this one.
Click to expand...

Ha, mate I don't know if we are ever going to see eye to eye. Murphy is a great kick, Young is not imo. Young might have a booming left foot kick, but it certainly isn't reliable or accurate hitting up targets. Still, he would be a good option to have coming off a wing, as we don't have many line breakers in the side.
 
Clinton Young fills a very required need.

Even if 'soft', we need some foot skills off half back and on the wing.

Would be a terrific replacement for Wellingham.

His left foot is damaging from 60 metres out.
 
chrisaaa said:
Id love to talk to you after we get a measely pick for Wellingham, wont get a first rounder
Click to expand...
I'm sure that would make you very happy. Meanwhile, "or" means that none of those four things will happen, namely Dawes OR Wellingham attract a 1st rounder OR get picked up by other than Melbourne or WCE respectively in the PSD. Good luck with that.
 
Dundalis said:
I don't think I am. It's not all about current or past achievements, but also about the future. Most of the trades you mentioned, the players may not have achieved as much as Dawes, but IMO have more room for growth (or did at the time of the trade). Via both their age, and their attributes. We know what Dawes is, and we know what he isn't. If I'm a club trading for him, I'm not buying high on what Dawes is going to be. I don't see the growth potential there, and what he is now is a player with some terrible attributes for his position. A massive upturn in his form is still highly likely to result in anything resembling a star level player.

I think teams are more likely to give up decent picks for a relatively unknown player if they feel there is a decent ceiling to dream on. Despite Dawes' accomplishments (Premiership player, decent year in 2010) that doesn't really apply to him. Obviously it looks like Melbourne may disagree with that, which would be good for us. If we get anything better than a 3rd rounder I'd pretty much consider it a steal.
Click to expand...

I dont disagree its a difficult one but I think clubs will acknowledge he was asked to play a role last year that was foreign to him and if they arent asking him to do that they will weigh his '10 and '11 form more highly. I think one of the major issues to go against him is 'why are Collingwood even letting him think about it'. If I was an opposition recruiter that is what I would be worried about.

If the news this morning is true and Dees will lose pick #13 and get #20 then I suspect you are right on the money for Dawes value.

It would not surprise me if they lose 3 and 13 for Hogan and Barry and then collect #20 and pass to us for Dawes. I would be ok with that but given what Crows got for Gunston it wouldnt or shouldnt be any less as we woudl be getting unders.

It should net us one of Shaw or Jaksch as KPF's with the latter the one am especially keen on.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Similar threads

H
    • Like
2026 Trade / FA Thread
2
Replies
33
Views
376
manicpie
manicpie
PonsfordMagpie
    • Like
News 2025 Finals Tickets Thread
17 18 19 20 21
Replies
524
Views
22K
manicmagpie
manicmagpie
jmac70
    • Like
    • Haha
  • Poll Poll
Rumour Does Kane Cornes post on the BF Collingwood board?
2 3
Replies
52
Views
2K
leon123
leon123
stormskye
Oppo Camp 2025 Other Games Rolling Thread
697 698 699 700 701
Replies
18K
Views
387K
Magnanimous
Magnanimous
Stronzatello
Rumour AFL player to retire (confirmed: Angus Brayshaw)
2 3
Replies
72
Views
4K
domus
domus
TradeDraft
    • Like
  • Locked
List Mgmt. 2025 Trade/FA Thread
608 609 610 611 612
Replies
15K
Views
543K
MightyRoar
M
TradeDraft
    • Like
List Mgmt. 2025 Trade/FA Thread (Cont’d)
743 744 745 746 747
Replies
19K
Views
538K
sr36
sr36

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom