So essentially got burton Mayes a dursma for wingard
If you trade Chad Wingard, you’re probably gonna need to end up with Jack Lukosios and Izak Rankine to justify it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Brisbane Lions v Collingwood - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Lions at 64% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
So essentially got burton Mayes a dursma for wingard
If you trade Chad Wingard, you’re probably gonna need to end up with Jack Lukosios and Izak Rankine to justify it.
The fact that Hawthorn were keen to move in Burton makes me wonder if they know something we dont.
Certainly seems like it was a monumental stuff up by Port/Kochie, but it worked out pretty well in the end all things considered. Burton will play 250 games and two early picks is kind of what they said they were chasing in the first place.
From our point of view I still can't believe Wingard is on our list. I was also shocked when I read he is still 25. We need an X factor goal kicker and we got one of the best. He had elite numbers for that ~8 week stretch where he played in the middle this year too.
Hawks fans seem to be more delighted with this trade right now but I think once the dust settles, Port fans will warm to it just as much.
I personally believe the Hawks over paid big time,Just looking at the players selected around these picks
Collier-Dawkins , Bytel , Burton for Wingard looks very steep to me
I think the same could be said for Wingard aswell , He has been extremely disappointing last couple of years and may never become the player he promised to become.Too early to call. The above players may achieve nothing, they may be the best in the league
I personally believe the Hawks over paid big time,Just looking at the players selected around these picks
Collier-Dawkins , Bytel , Burton for Wingard looks very steep to me
I think the same could be said for Wingard aswell , He has been extremely disappointing last couple of years and may never become the player he promised to become.
Just a comparison of a player we traded for 2 years ago in Josh Caddy which cost us a late mid 2nd rounder with an upgrade of our 3rd rounder so roughly pick #32
https://www.footywire.com/afl/footy...2=15&type=A&pid1=3644&pid2=3453&fid1=C&fid2=C
Just seems like alot to give up for a player like Wingard
Derp.They weren't 'keen to move on Burton'. They were keen to bring in Wingard and were pragmatic enough to realise that the only way of getting him was to move on Burton. Your attempt at re-writing history to service your anti-Port agenda hasn't worked, go back to the drawing board and try again.
I like how you just picked the guy your club drafted as the example rather than the guy taken at the actual pick. If you were going to cheat you could've at least picked Stocker who has shown miles more than Collier-Dawkins as a junior.
Does Caddy have two AA's and a best and fairest to his name like Wingard does?
Ok so let me ask you this question, Would you give up Duursman,Burton and what ever the trade was for #35 for Chad if you could ?
I'd 100% keep Chad every day of the week.
The only way I can justify this trade is if the rumours regarding Wingard wanting out through free agency next year anyway were true, in which case the package we got for him now is better than the compo pick we would've gotten for him next year. But I'd take Chad back in a second if I could.
You're severely underrating him, a guy like Caddy isn't fit to carry his bags. Caddy won't achieve the individual awards in his whole career that Chad had already achieved by the age of 22.
Maybe you are over rating Wingard , If you look at their career output there is barely a bee's dick in it and the last year Caddy is a better player easily
Maybe thats because Caddy is happy playing in a team that won a flagIf you look at stats alone Dale Thomas had a better year than Trent Cotchin. Let's just say there's a reason nobody's offering #15 and Burton for Josh Caddy.
Maybe thats because Caddy is happy playing in a team that won a flag
You clearly didnt understand my comment , Ill simplify itAh okay. Toby Thurstans > Matthew Richardson then.
Richmond supporters of all people using the 'bUt He PlAyEd In A pReMiErShIp' argument is hilarious.
Does Wingard still play Fortnite
You clearly didnt understand my comment , Ill simplify it
Thats because Caddy is happy playing in a premiership winning team , Meaning its pointless he wont leave
Wingard - Wanted to leave even though contracted
Dude you are the one that said nobody is chasing Caddy and i replied as to why, Now you look to be rattled and just grasping at strawsSo you're just mindlessly trolling then? Okay, noted.
Not really the same thing, the person you replied to said those players may achieve nothing. They are yet to play AFL games and could be total busts, the same can't be said for Wingard because we already know he has what it takes to play at this level.I think the same could be said for Wingard aswell , He has been extremely disappointing last couple of years and may never become the player he promised to become.
Just a comparison of a player we traded for 2 years ago in Josh Caddy which cost us a late mid 2nd rounder with an upgrade of our 3rd rounder so roughly pick #32
https://www.footywire.com/afl/footy...2=15&type=A&pid1=3644&pid2=3453&fid1=C&fid2=C
Just seems like alot to give up for a player like Wingard
We didn’t shop him around as such but we knew he would be a key instigator in completing the trade for WingardJust to be clear, Hawthorn did not shop Burton around it was raised by Cripps.