Remove this Banner Ad

Stats & History S32 Rules & Tribunal Thread

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Simmer errors should face the same penalties as team sheet errors. They need to be held to account!

WORSE. They should after the first transgression be removed from duty.

Just like AdSin's that **** the show.
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I can't be the only Fury with a guilty conscience after yesterday's game.
Knowing Cold Sober played without his captain's permission due to an indiscretion by NaturalDisaster and his cronies really irks me.

I demand a re sim!!!
HawkAussie is the true victim here. He was supposed to have been rewarded for his return to activity last week, but he's been robbed of a game by the incompetent simmers!
 
I think we had a half a 3rd quarter and two 4th quarters, truly a disgarce!

NaturalDisaster believes this is fair play/carry on/umps call ... clearly a copy pasta error ... far be it that the SFA you know, revolves around the actual game!

Heaven forbid we see a COMPLETE sim ... oh no ... that would be too much ... misspell a name though ... and off with your ****ing head mate!
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Looking at the actual re-sim policy, the aspersions cast on the simmers are indeed based on innuendo and a general lack of understanding of the rules of the likes of serial_thrilla. The simmers in fact have the discretion to name Dawn to Dark and drop one of any random Bomber for example. In that scenario, it doesn't qualify as one of the two conditions for a re-sim. Imagine replacing the Fred leader in the final round. Again no basis for a re-sim. I don't know whether to feel disgusted or inspired.

So whilst Tony Lynn 15 has the right idea for the faceless men*, who is actually responsible for this totally unacceptable travesty? Good question Ding. The faceless men are the Committee who sanction the very rules that the great people of Sweet rely on. These are the very same faceless men* that also sanction the outdated All SFA selection criteria rules. amirite Headless

I see the cracks developing. We now have a Super League where a new group feel they have to right to draft players without their consent. Trust me when I say this my peoples, the upper echelon are scurrying to gather Admin and mods to make these "disruptors" disappear. *stern look

SEC [12]. MATCH VALIDITY

All matches simulated and posted by the league's simmer/s (or other authorised persons) will be deemed final unless a situation arises where a resim is deemed necessary as described in the table below. A captain may request a resim and this must be requested via a Private Message to the league Administrator within 24 hours of the match being posted. All other situations will be assessed by the Administrator and the Committee.


Resim Policy

Resim:


- glitch occurs in the simming application where a quarter ends earlier than normal
- two players of the same name are entered into the sim

No Resim:

- incorrect spelling of a player name
- incorrect entry of home/away team
- glitch occurs in the simming application where there is a timeskip within a quarter
- a non-existent player is named in the sim
- players are not named in the correct on field positions according to the official team sheet
 
Looking at the actual re-sim policy, the aspersions cast on the simmers are indeed based on innuendo and a general lack of understanding of the rules of the likes of serial_thrilla. The simmers in fact have the discretion to name Dawn to Dark and drop one of any random Bomber for example. In that scenario, it doesn't qualify as one of the two conditions for a re-sim. Imagine replacing the Fred leader in the final round. Again no basis for a re-sim. I don't know whether to feel disgusted or inspired.

So whilst Tony Lynn 15 has the right idea for the faceless men*, who is actually responsible for this totally unacceptable travesty? Good question Ding. The faceless men are the Committee who sanction the very rules that the great people of Sweet rely on. These are the very same faceless men* that also sanction the outdated All SFA selection criteria rules. amirite Headless

I see the cracks developing. We now have a Super League where a new group feel they have to right to draft players without their consent. Trust me when I say this my peoples, the upper echelon are scurrying to gather Admin and mods to make these "disruptors" disappear. *stern look

SEC [12]. MATCH VALIDITY

All matches simulated and posted by the league's simmer/s (or other authorised persons) will be deemed final unless a situation arises where a resim is deemed necessary as described in the table below. A captain may request a resim and this must be requested via a Private Message to the league Administrator within 24 hours of the match being posted. All other situations will be assessed by the Administrator and the Committee.


Resim Policy

Resim:


- glitch occurs in the simming application where a quarter ends earlier than normal
- two players of the same name are entered into the sim

No Resim:

- incorrect spelling of a player name
- incorrect entry of home/away team
- glitch occurs in the simming application where there is a timeskip within a quarter
- a non-existent player is named in the sim
- players are not named in the correct on field positions according to the official team sheet

A FACELESS MAN REVEALLED!
 
Looking at the actual re-sim policy, the aspersions cast on the simmers are indeed based on innuendo and a general lack of understanding of the rules of the likes of serial_thrilla. The simmers in fact have the discretion to name Dawn to Dark and drop one of any random Bomber for example. In that scenario, it doesn't qualify as one of the two conditions for a re-sim. Imagine replacing the Fred leader in the final round. Again no basis for a re-sim. I don't know whether to feel disgusted or inspired.

So whilst Tony Lynn 15 has the right idea for the faceless men*, who is actually responsible for this totally unacceptable travesty? Good question Ding. The faceless men are the Committee who sanction the very rules that the great people of Sweet rely on. These are the very same faceless men* that also sanction the outdated All SFA selection criteria rules. amirite Headless

I see the cracks developing. We now have a Super League where a new group feel they have to right to draft players without their consent. Trust me when I say this my peoples, the upper echelon are scurrying to gather Admin and mods to make these "disruptors" disappear. *stern look

SEC [12]. MATCH VALIDITY

All matches simulated and posted by the league's simmer/s (or other authorised persons) will be deemed final unless a situation arises where a resim is deemed necessary as described in the table below. A captain may request a resim and this must be requested via a Private Message to the league Administrator within 24 hours of the match being posted. All other situations will be assessed by the Administrator and the Committee.


Resim Policy

Resim:


- glitch occurs in the simming application where a quarter ends earlier than normal
- two players of the same name are entered into the sim

No Resim:

- incorrect spelling of a player name
- incorrect entry of home/away team
- glitch occurs in the simming application where there is a timeskip within a quarter
- a non-existent player is named in the sim
- players are not named in the correct on field positions according to the official team sheet

- glitch occurs in the simming application where there is a timeskip within a quarter

What about when two 4th quarters are posted and only one half of the third?

Where does that sit?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

- glitch occurs in the simming application where there is a timeskip within a quarter

What about when two 4th quarters are posted and only one half of the third?

Where does that sit?
Is that a glitch with the sim or posting of the correct sim? In the case of the latter where does that sit?
 
- glitch occurs in the simming application where there is a timeskip within a quarter

What about when two 4th quarters are posted and only one half of the third?

Where does that sit?

That’s not the sim, that’s just posting. It’s like when one person replies to a post with a response and then later responds to the same post with a contrary response.

Little more than a shinninigen.
 
Is that a glitch with the sim or posting of the correct sim? In the case of the latter where does that sit?

It is only my job to voice objections, your job or ND if he doesn't delegate to sort this corruption out.

If a campaigner can't do something as simple as copy pasta ... what faith should we have in any of the process?
 
- glitch occurs in the simming application where there is a timeskip within a quarter

What about when two 4th quarters are posted and only one half of the third?

Where does that sit?

The match poster copy and pasted as it was from the sim file, but accidentally copied the incorrect section. Something I have done in the past.
 
Last edited:

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom