Rules S33 Rules & Tribunal Thread

[ClarkeM]

Anyone else smell shit?

 

[Kennedy Parker]

I hope Kennedy Parker takes a dictatorial approach

Dictatorships are for weak leaders who cannot inspire others to support their vision. Incompetent buffoons often fantasise about being dictators because force and threats is the only way they can implement their rubbish ideas.

Given I have just completed the most decisive admin election victory in SFA history there will clearly be no need for a dictatorial approach.

 

[ClarkeM]

Dictatorships are for weak leaders who cannot inspire others to support their vision. Incompetent buffoons often fantasise about being dictators because force and threats is the only way they can implement their rubbish ideas.

Given I have just completed the most decisive admin election victory in SFA history there will clearly be no need for a dictatorial approach.

I am so turned on right now

 

[Test Tickle]

Anyone else smell shit?

have a shower if you smell like shit you dirty prick!

 

[ClarkeM]

have a shower if you smell like shit you dirty prick!

I only take golden ones

 

[Test Tickle]

I only take golden ones

yum

 

[Supersuns]

What is the penalty for not having enough players to field a team?

 

[beez]

What is the penalty for not having enough players to field a team?

Who knows. But they'll probably beat Collingwood next week.

 

[Supersuns]

Who knows. But they'll probably beat Collingwood next week.

 

[ClarkeM]

What is the penalty for not having enough players to field a team?

If the Bombers cannot field a team due to their pathetic culture then the only option is to dock 8 points for this season and next season.

Player bans mean nothing. Ban the club. They bring it on themselves and so if people want to go play for a club starting on -8 next season then best of luck to them.

Pretty clear cut decision if you ask me.

Maybe the callback from Bandits to Bombers was apt after all...

 

[Kilroy]

If the Bombers cannot field a team due to their pathetic culture then the only option is to dock 8 points for this season and next season.

Player bans mean nothing. Ban the club. They bring it on themselves and so if people want to go play for a club starting on -8 next season then best of luck to them.

Pretty clear cut decision if you ask me.

Maybe the callback from Bandits to Bombers was apt after all...

Well what a ******* dour old sourpuss you are mate.

Glad we could help you restore some meaning in your life today by feeling better about yourself that, despite all appearances, at least you’re a more worthy sentient being than those naughty naughty Bombers.

You’re ******* welcome dude!

 

[Kilroy]

What is the penalty for not having enough players to field a team?

******* hell Sunny!

What have you gone and done mate?

 

[Jabba73]

Well what a ******* dour old sourpuss you are mate.

Glad we could help you restore some meaning in your life today by feeling better about yourself that, despite all appearances, at least you’re a more worthy sentient being than those naughty naughty Bombers.

You’re ******* welcome dude!

If you can’t love your own team, at least you can hate the Baghdad Bombers.

It is our gift to the wider SFA.

 

[Metalcrusher]

If the Bombers cannot field a team due to their pathetic culture then the only option is to dock 8 points for this season and next season.

Player bans mean nothing. Ban the club. They bring it on themselves and so if people want to go play for a club starting on -8 next season then best of luck to them.

Pretty clear cut decision if you ask me.

Maybe the callback from Bandits to Bombers was apt after all...

Calm down Rambo.

 

[Metalcrusher]

******* hell Sunny!

What have you gone and done mate?

His team mates were sick of him so they all left?

 

[ClarkeM]

Calm down Rambo.

Make it 12 points

 

[ClarkeM]

Well what a ******* dour old sourpuss you are mate.

Glad we could help you restore some meaning in your life today by feeling better about yourself that, despite all appearances, at least you’re a more worthy sentient being than those naughty naughty Bombers.

You’re ******* welcome dude!

It seems I triggered a nerve.

 

[ClarkeM]

Why did the Bombers play a suspended player again?

 

[Senor M]

Why did the Bombers play a suspended player again?

This was the punishment when the Bears played a suspended player earlier in the season.

The Las Vegas Bears have been charged with violation of rule 5B after listing an ineligble player in their Round 4 team sheet.



Earlier this week, a Bears player (Who will not be named due to mod privacy reasons) was sanctioned for violation of Bigfooty site rules/Section 1 of SFA rules. The Bears committee rep was informed on Saturday that he must dropped for the next week. As the Bears did not comply with this, they will be charged accordingly. This is a medium impact charge and thus captain Muddiemoose will serve a one week suspension in Round 5. Said player will also have to serve his ban in this round.



View attachment 1333772

The Bears have the right to appeal this charge and have until Midday Sunday 26/02 to do so.

 

[Kilroy]

Why did the Bombers play a suspended player again?

What!

Oh God, there’s gonna be hell to pay for this.

 

[Grand Uncle Horace]

Why did the Bombers play a suspended player again?

It is two.

Are the Bombers playing for points in their game against East Side?

 

[ClarkeM]

This was the punishment when the Bears played a suspended player earlier in the season.

Seems like a cop out punishment. Could the captain just keep naming the players - what’s to stop them?

Why isn’t the club penalised ?

 

[ClarkeM]

It is two.

Are the Bombers playing for points in their game against East Side?

I think they’re playing for laughs, which I appreciate.

 

[Kilroy]

It is two.

Are the Bombers playing for points in their game against East Side?

That and a slab of Baghdad Bitter.

 

[Jabba73]

It is two.

Are the Bombers playing for points in their game against East Side?

Bragging rights