- Joined
- Jul 16, 2015
- Posts
- 94,886
- Reaction score
- 162,929
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Fighting Furies
- Thread starter
- #1,076
Bit harsh on the Bombers, mate.
Just for that I am going to quit my job and do a trade just to piss you off.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Bit harsh on the Bombers, mate.
Just for that I am going to quit my job and do a trade just to piss you off.
Your value goes down in line with your time remaining in your current job.Just for that I am going to quit my job and do a trade just to piss you off.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Useless campaigner couldn’t even organise his team mates to vote for the next admin he would probably make the bombers worseThink the only way this is fixed is if NaturalDisaster gets traded to the bombers.
I am ok, thanks for asking. Happy to engage on conversation or debate with anyone about anything if they are willing to be either humorous or sensible.Well hot damn, three reply posts in a row. I hope you're doing okay.
Always happy to provide my opinion, which is the right one. Bombers ned to be penalised, not players.
Bombers players clearly do not care about suspensions so how about penalising the club (which will be done, I have no doubt) and then the impact is felt wider beyond the selfish individuals taking advantage of their cultural bias.
Nope, that would involve doing something. Ain’t gunna happen.Useless campaigner couldn’t even organise his team mates to vote for the next admin he would probably make the bombers worse
So, already well past everyone except the super serious self-appointed guardians of the SFA status quo then?You’ve been in the league for seasons, yet your understanding of how it works is the equivalent of a third week rookie.
So, already well past everyone except the super serious self-appointed guardians of the SFA status quo then?
Good enough for me, glad I have made rapid progress in your estimations. Thanks for your tick of approval it means so much to me in my quest to become one of the SFA elite.
I will need to be careful or I might start winning awards too, can’t be having that.
What a hatful of hubris!
Your Committee rep didn't explain to you what went down?So what's the bombers punishment for fielding a team with two ineligible players last week NaturalDisaster?
Humour him please.Your Committee rep didn't explain to you what went down?
To field a team ND let the bombers have some players serve their suspension over 2 rounds. However they didn't use all of their listed players, playing 1 of the banned players over them. That's what they should be charged forHumour him please.
Mine didn't
Your Committee rep didn't explain to you what went down?
I'd like a little more detail on this. So the admin has allowed ineligible players, play and then let that team win by 10 goals. Sounds like justice to me. Chipmunk should be absolutely fuming right now. I expect that the bombers will be doing a LOT of recruiting this week to field a fully ELIGIBLE team against the Wonders this week.To field a team ND let the bombers have some players serve their suspension over 2 rounds. However they didn't use all of their listed players, playing 1 of the banned players over them. That's what they should be charged for
**** who cares if they won omfgI'd like a little more detail on this. So the admin has allowed ineligible players, play and then let that team win by 10 goals. Sounds like justice to me. Chipmunk should be absolutely fuming right now. I expect that the bombers will be doing a LOT of recruiting this week to field a fully ELIGIBLE team against the Wonders this week.
BUT - ND never told them that they had to play all their eligible players ahead of the suspended ones. Just that they had two weeks to serve all the suspensions.To field a team ND let the bombers have some players serve their suspension over 2 rounds. However they didn't use all of their listed players, playing 1 of the banned players over them. That's what they should be charged for
was not aware that was the case. still common sense on the bombers part to play all your unbanned players.BUT - ND never told them that they had to play all their eligible players ahead of the suspended ones. Just that they had two weeks to serve all the suspensions.
This is what happens when a wet lettuce leaf admin runs the show.
Wow, pathetic and soft from NaturalDisaster.To field a team ND let the bombers have some players serve their suspension over 2 rounds. However they didn't use all of their listed players, playing 1 of the banned players over them. That's what they should be charged for
oh so you're talking all this crap now because they play the wonders this week? hahahahahahah you are ****ing gutlessNaturalDisaster, do you agree thT the Bombers have sufficient time and warning to recruit the required amount of players to field a fully eligible team against the Wonders this week? And what will be the punishment if they don't?
NaturalDisaster, do you agree thT the Bombers have sufficient time and warning to recruit the required amount of players to field a fully eligible team against the Wonders this week? And what will be the punishment if they don't?

