Remove this Banner Ad

Rules S33 Rules & Tribunal Thread

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

You seem excited, Andrew.
Not really. More intrigued as to what the Bombers thought might happen. Seems like a strange hill to die on.
 
Not really. More intrigued as to what the Bombers thought might happen. Seems like a strange hill to die on.

Are you going to make a comeback Numero Andrew?
 
I'd like a little more detail on this. So the admin has allowed ineligible players, play and then let that team win by 10 goals. Sounds like justice to me. Chipmunk should be absolutely fuming right now. I expect that the bombers will be doing a LOT of recruiting this week to field a fully ELIGIBLE team against the Wonders this week.

I don’t think it’s in dispute that the team was ineligible and the Admin has allowed the team to play against us last week through some sort of executive power Michael Masi-style. The only power we have as a team is to ask for an override and get a committee vote as it’s not eligible for a resim.

I felt its far better for the league for the Bombers to sort themselves out rather than be overly defensive about the result of a qooty game.

If they don’t get a team against the Wonders, I consider the Admin agreement to be null and void and there is scope for retrospective changes to our result. I’ll see what happens later in the week though.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Hold up, did the Bombers not have enough players to fill their team sheet last week? I was led to believe that wasn't the case.

I hate piling in on a team but it's right there in the high impact penalties.
 
Hold up, did the Bombers not have enough players to fill their team sheet last week? I was led to believe that wasn't the case.

I hate piling in on a team but it's right there in the high impact penalties.

NaturalDisaster gave them permission to serve their match bans over a 2 week period
 
I'm assuming someone has already submitted an application to charge NaturalDisaster with bringing the game into disrepute?

Absolutely shameful conduct as Administrator.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Well not really. He wouldnt have done it without due process involving committee input, right?

Right?

steve coogan GIF
 
Thought experiment:

It's Season 28, Ant Bear is the administrator, a club has a massive number of site suspensions resulting in their list having less than 20 eligible players and being in contravention of 6A "The following list of offences will result in a 2 point deduction in league standings, and 1 game suspension for a team’s listed captain(s):
  • Failing to satisfy the minimum team list requirement in season (20 eligible players) as per 4A"
Instead of enforcing such a rule Ant Bear privately agrees with that club's leaders to allow them to play ineligible players for a week and serve all their suspensions across two weeks with no input from the committee.

Wonder what kind of response from the broader league AB would receive in such a hypothetical.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom