Admin Notice S34 Rules & Tribunal Thread

[Agent93]

Oh s**t, I could have bumped #scandal

Get your head in the game tit-****er.

 

[Robertio]

BLUEALLTHRU can't really call for Swamprat heads to roll, because when the Bombers * up like they always do, he will be pleading for support.

When did he do that?

 

[brahj]

Get your head in the game tit-*er.

Like I had my head in your Mum last night, Agent?

All that banging against the wall and I need a panadol, on your way to the chemist don't forget to give your balls a tug.

 

[CursingFijian]

I am shocked and appalled that the Baghdad Bombers captain does not appreciate the law.

It’s more rule than law though in this instance.

The Bombers have voted to uphold two of the three breaches. The third is simply an oversight, that is undeserving of a premiership point penalty.

This is a case of myopic teams making a rod for their own backs. I would actually argue that the League and it’s administration are equally culpable for the oversight.

 

[Agent93]

This is a case of teams making a rod for their own backs.

You do realise this is the point, right?

 

[Kilroy]

I am shocked and appalled that the Baghdad Bombers captain does not appreciate the law.

Does your appreciation include a little kowtow at the end?

 

[ClarkeM]

The Bombers have voted to uphold two of the three breaches

How have they voted on something that wasn't being appealed?

Oh wait, it's the Bombers. That's right. They don't know what the **** they're even talking about.

 

[Greenery]

Does your appreciation include a little kowtow at the end?

Not a little kowtow, I am not shy.
I am glad that you have in fact correctly stated that the kowtow is at the end of the sequence after I have sworn my oath.

 

[CursingFijian]

You do realise this is the point, right?

Not in my opinion.

If power raid was excluded from S34 because of his omission it would have been an injustice.

And to uphold a punitive ruling for avoiding an injustice is counter intuitive to what the rule is all about.

 

[CursingFijian]

How have they voted on something that wasn't being appealed?

Oh wait, it's the Bombers. That's right. They don't know what the * they're even talking about.[emoji1787]

I will readily admit to not knowing what I am talking about.

Will you?

 

[Agent93]

If power raid was excluded from S34

That was never a consideration.

 

[CursingFijian]

That was never a consideration.

Which is why the points penalty is a farce.

 

[Headless]

Which is why the points penalty is a farce.

Why?

 

[Agent93]

Which is why the points penalty is a farce.

What the actual **** are you smoking?

The Swamprats:
1. Listed a new player who had not posted consent (at all in the SFA board).
2. Submitted a squad outside regulations.
3. Posted a team sheet containing a player not in their squad.

The Swamprats appeal, which the committee voted on, was that infraction 2 caused infraction 3 and they should not be 'struck'* twice for it. It has nothing to with Power Raid's eligibility to play S34, which was sorted out by the admin in their summary of charges.

The committee should be raising BTGID against the Bombers representative for having NFI what they're doing.

*FFS Kennedy Parker, this is not baseball.

 

[Grand Uncle Horace]

Oh s**t, I could have bumped #scandal

daily,if not hourly.

 

[brahj]

daily,if not hourly.

If the Bombers keep going the way they are in this thread then a bump might be imminent.

 

[Robertio]

What the actual * are you smoking?

The Swamprats:
1. Listed a new player
2. Submitted a squad outside regulations.
3. Posted a team sheet containing a player not in their squad.

The Swamprats appeal, which the committee voted on, was that infraction 2 caused infraction 3 and they should not be 'struck'* twice for it. It has nothing to with Power Raid's eligibility to play S34, which was sorted out by the admin in their summary of charges.

The committee should be raising BTGID against the Bombers representative for having NFI what they're doing.

*FFS Kennedy Parker, this is not baseball.

This isn't about the Bombers mate, even though we would like it to be.

 

[ClarkeM]

Why?

 

[CursingFijian]

What the actual * are you smoking?

The Swamprats:
1. Listed a new player who had not posted consent (at all in the SFA board).
2. Submitted a squad outside regulations.
3. Posted a team sheet containing a player not in their squad.

The Swamprats appeal, which the committee voted on, was that infraction 2 caused infraction 3 and they should not be 'struck'* twice for it. It has nothing to with Power Raid's eligibility to play S34, which was sorted out by the admin in their summary of charges.

The committee should be raising BTGID against the Bombers representative for having NFI what they're doing.

*FFS Kennedy Parker, this is not baseball.

 

[Agent93]

This isn't about the Bombers mate, even though we would like it to be.

I dunno Rob, a Bombers LG member is trumpeting that your committee rep voted against the majority for a reason that wasn't even under consideration. Some might want to examine that competency as one of the decision-makers for the league.

 

[T2B_]

We did vote on this occasion

 

[The Filth Wizard]

If the Bombers keep going the way they are in this thread then a bump might be imminent.

This is the prime moment for you to shoot for a beez. Gone long enough the newbies don't know you, gone too long that the veterans are just dang glad to see that sloth back.

 

[Kennedy Parker]

Oh s**t, I could have bumped #scandal

Please be on standby, working on more nonsense in the coming weeks.

 

[Kennedy Parker]

What the actual * are you smoking?

The Swamprats:
1. Listed a new player who had not posted consent (at all in the SFA board).
2. Submitted a squad outside regulations.
3. Posted a team sheet containing a player not in their squad.

The Swamprats appeal, which the committee voted on, was that infraction 2 caused infraction 3 and they should not be 'struck'* twice for it. It has nothing to with Power Raid's eligibility to play S34, which was sorted out by the admin in their summary of charges.

The committee should be raising BTGID against the Bombers representative for having NFI what they're doing.

*FFS Kennedy Parker, this is not baseball.

We need to make the league more appealing to DemonJim

 

[DemonJim]

We need to make the league more appealing to DemonJim