Admin Notice S35 Rules & Tribunal Thread

[Cadsky]

It’s disappointing that people have to say the bloody same thing to you over and over again and you still don’t get it.

If Ralph can count to farking POTATO you can at least try to understand what pick & co are saying.

Cubs2Lions, what a guy!

 

[Ligma]

Cubs2Lions, what a guy!

I farking love him!

 

[TheInjuryFactory]

Dude.

Vomiting needs just the one 't'.

He hasn't thrown it up yet.

 

[TheInjuryFactory]

ATT: manangatang

RE: Concerns

 

[Cadsky]

I farking love him!

Get in line, he was mine first!

 

[damicky]

He is mine now!

 

[Pickitt]

He is mine now!

What

 

[damicky]

What

Cubs2Lions

 

[Cadsky]

What

Quoting fail at its finest mate

 

[Pickitt]

Cubs2Lions

?!?!?!?

 

[damicky]

Quoting fail at its finest mate

 

[Elton Johns Wig]

How’s the hangover, Killa?

Vein, you unaccommodating campaigner, please kindly send me a PM as I do not have the ability to send you one because you're a campaigner.

Cheers campaigner

 

[Cubs2Lions]

Cubs2Lions, what a guy!

I farking love him!

He is mine now!

Cubs2Lions

 

[Cadsky]

Have a look at you, Mr popularity

 

[manangatang]

ATT: manangatang

RE: Concerns

Slide into my box

 

[TheInjuryFactory]

Slide into my box

 

[Cubs2Lions]

Have a look at you, Mr popularity

 

[Cadsky]

 

[manangatang]

Ithink you are being ridiculous…

OK

 

[Jabba73]

If you choose to ignore precedent simply because you weren’t here, then you clearly can’t provide an educated opinion on the situation.

The league existed before S34 & those events impact the rules of the league.

My reference was towards the mass BomberBan of a few seasons ago—- if you choose not to know your own clubs history, that’s on you— not me.

Those bans are completely irrelevant to the current discussion as most were not for breaches of site rules.

Seems pretty arrogant for you to assume you know what happened when you were not involved at all, so could have zero knowledge of the event.

 

[Senor M]

Those bans are completely irrelevant to the current discussion as most were not for breaches of site rules.

Seems pretty arrogant for you to assume you know what happened when you were not involved at all, so could have zero knowledge of the event.

The discussion was about entire clubs being punished for the actions of individuals at a club. The entire club suffered for the actions of a few select individuals.

If you struggle to follow along mate, probably best you don’t get involved well & truely after the discussion has finished.

 

[Jabba73]

Pretty sure that they would have been able to find somebody even from another team who would have helped them out in the short term, at least you would hope they could. I agree though that having numbers that are close to the minimum is a risky thing.

We had several willing to help out. Unfortunately a concerted effort assisted by an incompetent Admin while we had zero representation in the Committee, allowed some vested interests to pursue their own agenda for their own amusement.

It was sadly the most exciting thing that had happened for a few of them in some time.

 

[Jabba73]

* me, it's Jabba73 2.0

I don’t think we can be friends anymore.

 

[VainGlorious]

Still going.

 

[Jabba73]

The discussion was about entire clubs being punished for the actions of individuals at a club. The entire club suffered for the actions of a few select individuals.

If you struggle to follow along mate, probably best you don’t get involved well & truely after the discussion has finished.

Wrong again, as I already said …

Seems pretty arrogant for you to assume you know what happened when you were not involved at all, so could have zero knowledge of the event.