Remove this Banner Ad

Admin Notice S35 Rules & Tribunal Thread

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Surely a former admin doesn't need someone to walk them through the rules?

patrick-stewart-mild-shock.gif
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

So Kennedy Parker, which Furies captain will be serving the ban next week? 🙂
Haven't really noticed anything but it would be quite an achievement if the Furies managed to stuff up in a week they have the bye and don't need to post a team sheet. Wouldn't put it past them though.
 
Haven't really noticed anything but it would be quite an achievement if the Furies managed to stuff up in a week they have the bye and don't need to post a team sheet. Wouldn't put it past them though.
Just TIF being a muppet, nothing new.
 
Haven't really noticed anything but it would be quite an achievement if the Furies managed to stuff up in a week they have the bye and don't need to post a team sheet. Wouldn't put it past them though.
Oh sorry to bother you mate, I forgot you don't work here anymore.
 
SEC [4]. SQUAD MANAGEMENT/PLAYER MOVEMENT

4B) Squad Changes

A player may only have one account as a listed player in the Sweet FA. No aliases allowed.
A minimum 8 game suspension applies for a breach. Alias accounts may be used in a joking manner in media and match threads only, any alias accounts posting in a sign up thread will be considered a breach.

Failure to adhere to these Rules will be punished under Sec[6] of these Rules, as determined by the Administrator.
6B) Minor Offence

The following list of offences will result in an Official Warning under a 'Three-Strike Policy'. Every THIRD Official Warning within a season will result in a 2 point deduction in the league standings. In addition to the Official Warning, for every Minor Offence a 1-game suspension will be imposed on the club captain, or a captain of the club's choosing if there are multiple captains at a club.

    • Incorrect squad changes as per 4B
simpsons-chief-wigum.gif
 

Remove this Banner Ad

The person responsible for the alias isn't a Furies player
Well, they're both aren't they.

It's besides the point, the error is in the squad addition.

It's there in black and white, the charge should be laid and the appeals process kicks in from there.
 
Well, they're both aren't they.

It's besides the point, the error is in the squad addition.

It's there in black and white, the charge should be laid and the appeals process kicks in from there.
If you knowingly recruit an alias, yes, you are correct. But if you recruit someone who you think is genuinely a new player why should the person doing the recruiting be punished? You'd punish the person at fault, right?
 
Well, they're both aren't they.

It's besides the point, the error is in the squad addition.

It's there in black and white, the charge should be laid and the appeals process kicks in from there.

Then shouldn’t you be accusing the captains of both clubs involved? Not just the Furies?
 
If you knowingly recruit an alias, yes, you are correct. But if you recruit someone who you think is genuinely a new player why should the person doing the recruiting be punished? You'd punish the person at fault, right?

Exactly

You can’t punish either player though because they are already dead
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

If you knowingly recruit an alias, yes, you are correct. But if you recruit someone who you think is genuinely a new player why should the person doing the recruiting be punished? You'd punish the person at fault, right?
Knowingly is a major offence.
 
Well, they're both aren't they.

It's besides the point, the error is in the squad addition.

It's there in black and white, the charge should be laid and the appeals process kicks in from there.
That squad change occurred in S34 with no prior knowledge from the LG that the poster was an alias and the perpetrator moved teams over the offseason, then the S35 made the appropriate adjustment to the squad after new information surrounding an alias came to light. We can't punish a S35 team for something that happened in a previous season.
 
If you knowingly recruit an alias, yes, you are correct. But if you recruit someone who you think is genuinely a new player why should the person doing the recruiting be punished? You'd punish the person at fault, right?

Are you still upset about The Foolback tricking you last season?
 
That squad change occurred in S34 with no prior knowledge from the LG that the poster was an alias and the perpetrator moved teams over the offseason, then the S35 made the appropriate adjustment to the squad after new information surrounding an alias came to light. We can't punish a S35 team for something that happened in a previous season.
Oh right. Where does it say that?
 
Oh right. Where does it say that?
Ah the 'Statute of Limitations', another one of my brilliant deregulatory innovations. 🥳

6E) Notification

If players or teams wish to dispute raised penalties, they may submit appeals by post in this thread, by private message, or by committee representative to the league administration which describes mitigating evidence within 24 hours of being notified of the penalty by the administration.

The administration will make subsequent posts confirming either or all of:
  • the acceptance of a penalty
  • that an appeal has been made per 6D, and the origin of the appeal
  • the result of any appeal, and the applied penalty
The statute of limitations for raising a penalty is 1 week from the team sheet submission deadline. This means that if a team cannot be 'retrospectively' penalised for a violation that occurred more than 1 week prior, for which they were never given a notification for.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom