- Joined
- Jul 16, 2015
- Posts
- 94,886
- Reaction score
- 162,929
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Fighting Furies
?So Kennedy Parker, which Furies captain will be serving the ban next week?![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
?So Kennedy Parker, which Furies captain will be serving the ban next week?![]()
Surely a former admin doesn't need someone to walk them through the rules?
Surely a former admin doesn't need someone to walk them through the rules?

:melt emoji:
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Haven't really noticed anything but it would be quite an achievement if the Furies managed to stuff up in a week they have the bye and don't need to post a team sheet. Wouldn't put it past them though.So Kennedy Parker, which Furies captain will be serving the ban next week?![]()
Just TIF being a muppet, nothing new.Haven't really noticed anything but it would be quite an achievement if the Furies managed to stuff up in a week they have the bye and don't need to post a team sheet. Wouldn't put it past them though.
Oh sorry to bother you mate, I forgot you don't work here anymore.Haven't really noticed anything but it would be quite an achievement if the Furies managed to stuff up in a week they have the bye and don't need to post a team sheet. Wouldn't put it past them though.
Oh dearHaven't really noticed anything but it would be quite an achievement if the Furies managed to stuff up in a week they have the bye and don't need to post a team sheet. Wouldn't put it past them though.


SEC [4]. SQUAD MANAGEMENT/PLAYER MOVEMENT
4B) Squad Changes
A player may only have one account as a listed player in the Sweet FA. No aliases allowed. A minimum 8 game suspension applies for a breach. Alias accounts may be used in a joking manner in media and match threads only, any alias accounts posting in a sign up thread will be considered a breach.
Failure to adhere to these Rules will be punished under Sec[6] of these Rules, as determined by the Administrator.
6B) Minor Offence
The following list of offences will result in an Official Warning under a 'Three-Strike Policy'. Every THIRD Official Warning within a season will result in a 2 point deduction in the league standings. In addition to the Official Warning, for every Minor Offence a 1-game suspension will be imposed on the club captain, or a captain of the club's choosing if there are multiple captains at a club.
- Incorrect squad changes as per 4B
The person responsible for the alias isn't a Furies playerSo Kennedy Parker, which Furies captain will be serving the ban next week?![]()
Yeah nah
Well, they're both aren't they.The person responsible for the alias isn't a Furies player
If you knowingly recruit an alias, yes, you are correct. But if you recruit someone who you think is genuinely a new player why should the person doing the recruiting be punished? You'd punish the person at fault, right?Well, they're both aren't they.
It's besides the point, the error is in the squad addition.
It's there in black and white, the charge should be laid and the appeals process kicks in from there.
Well, they're both aren't they.
It's besides the point, the error is in the squad addition.
It's there in black and white, the charge should be laid and the appeals process kicks in from there.
Yeah nah
If you knowingly recruit an alias, yes, you are correct. But if you recruit someone who you think is genuinely a new player why should the person doing the recruiting be punished? You'd punish the person at fault, right?
Knowingly is a major offence.If you knowingly recruit an alias, yes, you are correct. But if you recruit someone who you think is genuinely a new player why should the person doing the recruiting be punished? You'd punish the person at fault, right?
That squad change occurred in S34 with no prior knowledge from the LG that the poster was an alias and the perpetrator moved teams over the offseason, then the S35 made the appropriate adjustment to the squad after new information surrounding an alias came to light. We can't punish a S35 team for something that happened in a previous season.Well, they're both aren't they.
It's besides the point, the error is in the squad addition.
It's there in black and white, the charge should be laid and the appeals process kicks in from there.
If you knowingly recruit an alias, yes, you are correct. But if you recruit someone who you think is genuinely a new player why should the person doing the recruiting be punished? You'd punish the person at fault, right?
Oh right. Where does it say that?That squad change occurred in S34 with no prior knowledge from the LG that the poster was an alias and the perpetrator moved teams over the offseason, then the S35 made the appropriate adjustment to the squad after new information surrounding an alias came to light. We can't punish a S35 team for something that happened in a previous season.
Knowingly is a major offence.
Ah the 'Statute of Limitations', another one of my brilliant deregulatory innovations.Oh right. Where does it say that?
