Opinion Sack Hinkley 6 - Kochblocked

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

Made even more funny by a quick search of said poster's history showing up a post potting Hinkley for never having made a GF as recently as Sunday lol.
I've said elsewhere that this year was the time for Koch to write up a succession plan for Ken, much like Eddie did for Malthouse when Malthouse had been at Collingwood for 10 years with no silverware to show for it.
 
Can't sack him until the season is complete. The clause enabling 50% payout is based on a year on year decline coming into the final year and requires the season to be completed in full.

Any teams that entered a loan agreement with the AFL during 2020/21 has access to this clause. It doesn't need to be written into his contract.
 
Does Donna even exist? Never seen her once in any media, does she even attend any club events.
The only event she has attended, to my knowledge, was a soiree at the end of season 2017 in the Hinkley kitchen, at which she said rather forcefully to the Club chairman: “David, shut the fouk up.” He did so, abruptly.

Koch is more afraid of Donna than he is of her husband, and he is terrified of Ken Hinkley. And the Hinkleys know it.
 
Can't sack him until the season is complete. The clause enabling 50% payout is based on a year on year decline coming into the final year and requires the season to be completed in full.

Any teams that entered a loan agreement with the AFL during 2020/21 has access to this clause. It doesn't need to be written into his contract.

Is....is that you David?
 
Can't sack him until the season is complete. The clause enabling 50% payout is based on a year on year decline coming into the final year and requires the season to be completed in full.

Any teams that entered a loan agreement with the AFL during 2020/21 has access to this clause. It doesn't need to be written into his contract.

Thanks, mysterious, in-the-know, stranger.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I'd keep emails to Richardson fairly short or send them to board members. He's just a nobody and probably sends them all straight to the trash bin anyway. A really underwhelming human being.
Probably, but at some point numbers of them must make even the fools there think. Each one added to the count helps in a small way. It was very cathartic to get it out, even if it's not read by anyone.
 
Can't sack him until the season is complete. The clause enabling 50% payout is based on a year on year decline coming into the final year and requires the season to be completed in full.

Any teams that entered a loan agreement with the AFL during 2020/21 has access to this clause. It doesn't need to be written into his contract.
A very interesting first post.
 
Can't sack him until the season is complete. The clause enabling 50% payout is based on a year on year decline coming into the final year and requires the season to be completed in full.

Any teams that entered a loan agreement with the AFL during 2020/21 has access to this clause. It doesn't need to be written into his contract.

This is very specific and informative, thank you!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top