The problem with that particular rule, the rule Bartlett so strongly defends, is that what was hands-in-the-back became hands-on-the-back. If a player is not unduly impeded, play on. We should be looking to making the game for free-flowing, awarding so many ridiculous free kicks for minor infringements is ruining the game.
Sack Jeff Gieschen
- Thread starter Flex_a_bull
- Start date
- Tagged users None
I think Jeff Gieschen should be sacked too, what I don't understand, is, what restrictions is someone with a "red card" given. So you can get a red card, and still start new posts
Seems like a stupid idea. I would of thought that once you got a red card, you couldn't post, never mind a new post. Perhaps thats why we have so many id!ots on here, because there is no accountability.
Nothing against the original poster, but if you have a red card, surely some exclusion period applies. Whats the deal
Seems like a stupid idea. I would of thought that once you got a red card, you couldn't post, never mind a new post. Perhaps thats why we have so many id!ots on here, because there is no accountability.
Nothing against the original poster, but if you have a red card, surely some exclusion period applies. Whats the deal
Hence why I asked Whats the deal
at the end of the message. I am asking, are you prevented from posting if you get a red card?????????????? Not potting for this guy, just others that seem hell bent on weighing in to convo's with red card on their names. I was getting abusive messages off a red card pest. Why can he still post. Should be off line for a period after the Red Card, not PMing me every couple of days.
Pie eyed
Premium Platinum
- Jun 26, 2007
- 42,592
- 23,342
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Magpies
Hear! Hear! to the OP.
Time for a massive clean out at AFL house.
Too many fleas and not enough dog.
Time for a massive clean out at AFL house.
Too many fleas and not enough dog.
