Not at all, but if he was using one of the other variants why do the recommended dosages match?
Starting to look ugly.
Up till now, I have thought that Dank was merely cutting it fine with AOD and S0 approval etc, and maybe we would be ok.
But this latest Thymosin thing is starting to smell. We can wriggle and say it mightn't have been for Ess players, but the timing of the question to Charters, the ordering and the dosages etc are strong circumstantial evidence. Also the vague use of the word "Thymosin" rather than the specific legal variety on the consent forms, and the fact that counter signatory was Robinson, not Reid. They all look bad.
Maybe this is what EFC were referring to way back in the beginning, when they said they are not sure what may have been administered to players, and irregular practices etc.
And this time, if, all things considered, the evidence is enough to convict, then the club and the players involved are screwed. It would be justifiable to ban players and remove points gained this year for playing players who were getting an advantage from using illegal growth stimulants.
Much worse than AOD9604.