She said Essendon fans are acting like the media injected the players. She misrepresented why Essendon fans have an issue with Journalists. Nobody is blaming them for this situation. If she wasn't falling in line she wouldn't make such an inaccurate statement and misrepresent what most Essendon fans feel.
What she wrote was a fluff piece.
Give it a break.
Emma has sat back and discussed the morphing of the debate from possible illegal supplements to sacking Hird, to EFC losing points/draft picks, without any proof that the players have been given illegal supplements. And she is writing from the prism of watching the media/essendon supporters/other clubs supporters fight to the death ( often irrationally ) through all forms of media.
It's unfortunate, that Emma clearly stated that James Hird has the support of the club/board/players/supporters.
And I can suggest in the strongest terms that Emma Quayle doesn't fall into line.