Discussion Sam Fisher charged with drug trafficking

Remove this Banner Ad

Top shelf Otard XO for sure!!


One of my mates would always get a couple of cognacs after a dinner. It's definitely good for sleep. Liquid narcolepsy.
 
It's sad but in Roo saying the AFL has to do more for the case maybe but while they are in the AFL they have the opportunity to get leverage off it and if they don't it shouldn't be the clubs to be held account , they can't hold everyone's hand through out there life.

Just the other day there was a article about Crouch working with a realtor to get experience when he finishes up his career and being a AFL player it should open doors for him.

Anyway St Kilda is no loner when it comes to this crap.

Only my opinion anyway.

The AFL have codes that all players and clubs sign, it's part of the reason why the document in relation to the AFL drugs policy is about the weakest document in existence as far as that code goes, so they should actually be held to account, but they're not since that rug is massive and it's a weak backing since they just didn't and don't want to actually deal with any fallout.

Take the Eagles situation for example.

Every man and their dog knew that yep, celebrity status in WA and a weak drug code in AFL meant good times a plenty on the side of Aus quite a few poke fun at and just ask for money from. eastern based people really don't GAF, just don't make the papers and the eventual situation of the cashed up high flying Eagles was some people leaving, oh hey all these peeps are high users and that guy is now dead.

It made the papers obviously and oh how strong the AFL is, how everyone needed to clean their acts up and do better and militarily spend on creating the perfect AFL player so Essendon could step over that line, and oh hello snaps of people sniffing white powders, please stop making the news.

Roo is right as is Joey that right now, the AFLPA is not at a point to deal with this, where people have actual issues that can and do spiral, and that there is this almost whimsical notion that they'll only affect themselves when they do and it'll be isolated. That's some pre women voting bullshit thinking right there, lets just go back to sending telegrams shall we?

As a system, they have hands in many people from young ages during prime years of life, those people are their product as without them there is no game there is just an idea. Much like they, club and AFL needed to go to Lovett and go "get off the piss and stop trying to get in womens pants then punching them when they refuse". But, much like the drug doc, the respect to women doc was a wet lettuce leaf by comparison to utter tripe.

The AFL were and are failing in most things in relation to those two documents. But since they have the game, no one gives a s**t to do anything about it.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top