- Sep 28, 2016
- 9,820
- 19,316
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
OMG, why is this thread still going. Its over, let it go... No-body listens to techno!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
True it is open to interpretation
But with the fact the AFC don't seem to have been too concerned at the fcat he pulled out, it may suggest the contract as it reads is just that, Round 23 of the AFL season then the player goes on annual leave but must attend the B and F, Which Gunston broke the agreement over
Totally agree with this.
Who said he had a function and 7 people showed up? That says it all. Actions speak louder than words.
True it is open to interpretation
But with the fact the AFC don't seem to have been too concerned at the fcat he pulled out, it may suggest the contract as it reads is just that, Round 23 of the AFL season then the player goes on annual leave but must attend the B and F, Which Gunston broke the agreement over
Not sure we can factor in the B&F as a defence after the Lever thing.
End of the day, whatever his contract says or doesn't say, Jacobs was eligible to play in the SANFL team. Andy Otten was also eligible.
Both have been given plenty by the club; Jacobs being carried to 201 games as a goodwill gesture and handed undisputed number 1 ruck status in recent seasons (despite not necessarily being deserving of this), Otten with our unwavering support through his many rehabs, playing him in a GF when that was a very questionable decision.
Otten chooses to play even after announcing his retirement, for the love of the club, footy, and likely to support the young players down back. And of course to win a SANFL flag.
Jacobs chooses not to play, reasons are unconfirmed but it definitely is not a good look.
If I was the club, I'd be pulling his one-year deal off the table.
Since you like to cast opinions
What do you believe Jacobs reason was?
And does the AFL season include reserves games for the club? Can’t see why they wouldn’t
Of course there is.I'm not sure there is a difference.
Reading the employment contract it seems pretty clear cut and it is written around the AFL season not SANFL, there is no ambiguity its very clear cut as it should be
Of course it was negotiated by the AFLPA to protect the players as thats their job, It could have even been requested by Birdman or Pav for all we know quite ironic really
I understand the argument around having a contract,I think it comes down to respect, the respect you have for your teammates, the respect you want to earn from your teammates, $ is not what it’s about if you leave with your head held high and you have gained the respect of your piers I would be happy and known I have done the honourable thing,let’s face it a contract only really determines the $
It’s written about AFL clubs and the games they participate in
Reading the employment contract it seems pretty clear cut and it is written around the AFL season not SANFL, there is no ambiguity its very clear cut as it should be
Of course it was negotiated by the AFLPA to protect the players as thats their job, It could have even been requested by Birdman or Pav for all we know quite ironic really
I’m a bit old school on that, the club has the power to terminate you, I’m there and get paid to which we have agreed $ to player footy, I absolutely understand your point, we may just have different principles and I’m not saying who’s right and wrongYou are correct its not around the contract
Was anyone critical of the AFC when they told Nathan Bock to clear out his locker before the season end when he announced he would be signing with the suns, and not even bother to come to training your not permitted, yet he was still mates with the boys, I actually saw him surfing with Perrie, shirley and Biglands once
Or is that more acceptable
So do you think for example that say a Saints player wouldn’t play for Sandringham in the VFL finals series?
I’m a bit old school on that, the club has the power to terminate you, I’m there and get paid to which we have agreed $ to player footy, I absolutely understand your point, we may just have different principles and I’m not saying who’s right and wrong
You are probably right we don’t know who made that call and I’m arguing my case on him not wanting to play which is wrong for me to base my opinion on thatNo one is right or wrong as we don't know why, if it was Adealide, as they did with Bock that told Sam to pack his bags or GWS making a request to Sam or Sam himself after an injury plagued year
Hospitals?
I am sure plenty of other people work back beyond their paid time to get work done.
Particularly if you are on a set salary.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Someone actually posted on the board here that the club stated it was up to Jacobs to choose whether or not to playHis decision if he wants to go outside of the agreement that he signed, he doesn't have to though
Gets down to why Sam wouldn't want to play, Ive asked that question on why would he say no to playing, its clear he has no contractural arrangements to.
Why do you think he doesnt want to play or was it adelaide not wanting him to play because he is leaving like they did with Nathan bock, or did GWS make a request to Sam
Could be any of those three reasons but unfortunatly we dont know
You are probably right we don’t know who made that call and I’m arguing my case on him not wanting to play which is wrong
Someone actually posted on the board here that the club stated it was up to Jacobs to choose whether or not to play
Unfortunately real world pressures dictate that is not always the case.....Should not be run as businesses, but to the extent that they are should pay people for their work.
Their post stated the club .. seriously though, why don't you email the club and ask them?
On the other hand, it's starting to look like you're getting cataract's
View attachment 739869
Unfortunately real world pressures dictate that is not always the case.....
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk