Happy_Hawker
Team Captain
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2015
- Posts
- 416
- Reaction score
- 705
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Mitchell leaving has NOTHING to do with the recruitment of Vickery
You offer Mitchell what we offered Vickery and he stays
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Mitchell leaving has NOTHING to do with the recruitment of Vickery
EXACTLY....Can someone tell me why exactly we're doing this?
Let's look at the scenarios
- Sam goes to West Coast, plays for 2 years. We receive 1st round pick. Everyone is a winner and I suppose I can kind of understand a deal like this (particularly if he comes back after those years to coach with us).
- Sam goes to West Coast, plays for 2 years and we receive a 2nd round pick. Why on earth would we trade our reigning B+F winner for pennies in the dollar? Particularly when his value isn't purely linked to his on-field ability, but also his ability to teach and curate our younger mids?
Graham Wright says we dont need to offload Sam to afford Jaeger and Tom.
Am I missing something?
You offer Mitchell what we offered Vickery and he stays
Sam would walk into an coaching assistant's job anywhere so going there to play for a year doesn't make any difference as far as I can see. Sam was very magnanimous in his comments this morning on radio but that's because he is a smart operator and will make the best of any situation. Whatever way you slice it and dice it still makes no sense to me. We don't have to get every player that says they want to come to us. I mean we are getting Ty Vickery but losing Sam????? It's bonkers!!!! Sometimes I wonder if all this trading stuff is just a big ego trip for the list managers.Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I just get home from golf to this shit. **** me. Maybe it is worth it for Tom Mitchell considering the age of them but ****!WTf ??? damo reporting he is going to west coast ???? WTF ???
I've lost my appetite; but thanks anyway...Tom lamb anyone?
EXACTLY....
I don't like it and don't make sense for the following reasons:
................
4) Loved every bit of Hawthorn for their "Family Club" comrade and this is very much going against this. You don't sell your dad to feed your kids how ever old he is. Come on Hawks please explain to me...
...He represents a key part of who the Hawthorn Football Club are in the last 12 years - professional, intelligent, hard working, and a fierce desire to keep improving.
..
This is not becoming any more palatable to me as the day goes on and I really can't understand the sense in it. We are going to get nothing for him it seems and it has no impact on us getting O'Meara or T Mitchell anyway... what is the point?Sam would walk into an coaching assistant's job anywhere so going there to play for a year doesn't make any difference as far as I can see. Sam was very magnanimous in his comments this morning on radio but that's because he is a smart operator and will make the best of any situation. Whatever way you slice it and dice it still makes no sense to me. We don't have to get every player that says they want to come to us. I mean we are getting Ty Vickery but losing Sam????? It's bonkers!!!! Sometimes I wonder if all this trading stuff is just a big ego trip for the list managers.
Doing that would be dumb list managementYou offer Mitchell what we offered Vickery and he stays
Barret is literal exploding with joy atm on trade radio.
(edit) ...and trying to make much more of this than is there.
Flog!!
Surely that must be a Gaff on your part.Tom lamb anyone?
Andrew Gaff?Surely that must be a Gaff on your part.
Wow pretty amazing how you could possibly find offence in what I have posted. Please show, no hiding here fella.No worries bumps. Obviously I'm not privy to relationships you have or you have with other posters.
Let's leave aside who knows who and disrespectful posts to all sides of family's and the inner workings of hawthorn, but here's one public point to ponder.......
Smith born in 2010
The twins 2011, so sure in 2-5 years Mitch will return to coach before high school for the kids, let's forget what age that starts to fit people's timelines.
As for ex AFL players not once have I used my information to big note myself here, given the amount of ex AFL people playing or coaching in my local league here in albury, least of all my local coach of north albury in Acker.
But like I said I don't hide behind user names, I'm not privy to any relationships on here but maybe we could leave the personal attacks hidden within code aside and look at things how they are?
You are missing the point. What is "club success" if we are getting a second round for him. And why him if that is the only thing we need. We could have got that with any of our fringe players.This part is rubbish, sorry.
We've moved guys on before, even great players.
The club's success is what motivates them, not your sense of some rosy tale.
Everyone's quick to judge Clarko on this, but maybe just maybe it's what Sam wants like Fagan and like Hill, Clarko won't stand in the way of players leaving and coaches too if it's what they really want.!
You are missing the point. What is "club success" if we are getting a second round for him. And why him if that is the only thing we need. We could have got that with any of our fringe players.


