- Joined
- Sep 13, 2000
- Posts
- 86,851
- Reaction score
- 42,960
- Location
- Melbourne cricket ground. Australia
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Horks
The more I think about it and the more I read about GC digging in their heels on this, the more I think this is about getting O'Meara.
Maybe it's wishful thinking (and meant for the 'Hypothetical' thread), but assuming we had our cap all worked out to get Tom, Vickery and JOM. They've planned for this for weeks, maybe even months now.
They probably didn't count on GC being as stubborn as they are. So they've given up trying to trade for JOM, as evidenced by giving Sydney our first pick, which they could've bundled with CG and given them a player like Shiels or Langford and they trade pick 14 (and maybe 19) to Brisbane for Hanley.
Of course that wont happen now because GC are being stubborn or Brisbane wanted more.
So lets say they had $600K set aside for JOM. They will clear between $400 to $600K with Sam's contract (assuming reports are correct), and front end year 1 of JOM's contract to $1M+ and tell him to go to the draft. Even Essendope doesn't have that kind of cap space, nor would Carlton even if they got rid of Gibbs because they want something in return.
JOM comes to us at no player/picks cost. Not without risk, but we've called bluffs before (taking Roughy at 2 knowing Richmond were unlikely to take Buddy at 5).
I'm hoping this is the 'bigger picture' that we're missing
Are you saying PSD because thats where a contract can be nominated? If so we still get picks in the ND. Only thing is no certainty getting omeara and mitch would be long gone








