When Tommy can sell Memberships during breaks in the game he'll have earned a call up in place of Impey.
Can someone please elaborate on this? What's go with Impey and memberships? I see it everywhere on here.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When Tommy can sell Memberships during breaks in the game he'll have earned a call up in place of Impey.
Seems we borrowed Professor Frink's AT-5000 Auto-dialer around the start of the season to 'contact' potential members. Jarman Impey's recorded message was used. Probably others too but Jars is our prince, and gets BigFooty Port board credit for every Port membership sold, and every upgrade.Can someone please elaborate on this? What's go with Impey and memberships? I see it everywhere on here.
Pretty sure he meant the bye champ.agree, with Rioli out theres reall no match up fr impey, Logan can do a job on Gunstan or Puopillo
Did you watch different finals to me last year?The 'pay cut' is fact, not a rumour. Perhaps you missed that... going from our best finals player to zero games this year is unusual to say the least. Pay attention!
Just doesn't lose a 1:1 at this level, in the air or on the ground.Good work today. Reads the play well and is good at intercepting.
Was in the top half dozen best players in my mind. Struggle to see who he would replace. Moore is in front of him.Just doesn't lose a 1:1 at this level, in the air or on the ground.
Was in the top half dozen best players in my mind. Struggle to see who he would replace. Moore is in front of him.
loved Ah Chee's mark
COLLINGWOOD 9.9 (63) PORT ADELAIDE 12. 15 (87)Did you watch different finals to me last year?
COLLINGWOOD 9.9 (63) PORT ADELAIDE 12. 15 (87)
GOALS: COLLINGWOOD: Swan 3, Cloke 2, Beams, Keeffe, Macaffer, Williams. PORT: Schulz 3, Wingard 3, Boak 2, Wines 2, Monfries, Westhoff.
BEST: COLLINGWOOD: Swan, Williams, Pendlebury, Beams, Sidebottom. PORT: Logan, Westhoff, Boak, Wingard, Schulz, Monfries, Cornes.
From The Age
So? Wines isn't in the best players yet he was immense that day. The paper doesn't always get it right. There are several ahead of Logan in line for a call up. If we need to call up a defender right now it has to be Heath. Logan is a great SANFL player, and an average AFL player. Best years are behind him and while he gives it everything he's got, like Matt Thomas, his everything just isn't good enough.COLLINGWOOD 9.9 (63) PORT ADELAIDE 12. 15 (87)
GOALS: COLLINGWOOD: Swan 3, Cloke 2, Beams, Keeffe, Macaffer, Williams. PORT: Schulz 3, Wingard 3, Boak 2, Wines 2, Monfries, Westhoff.
BEST: COLLINGWOOD: Swan, Williams, Pendlebury, Beams, Sidebottom. PORT: Logan, Westhoff, Boak, Wingard, Schulz, Monfries, Cornes.
From The Age
I dont think anyone has forgotten him!! Some others pushed ahead of him, but he will get back in the side at some point. Mercurial skills, just needs a bit more muscle & a bigger tank.i just watched the highlights from a few maggies games. gotta say that little jakey neade is a bit of a forgotten player that has a heap of talent. i always thought he came in too young as he was too light, but as he gets bigger he is going to get scary good.
I still can't believe the negativity surrounding Logan. Quite clearly there are other more natural footballers in the club that are maturing and stepped ahead of Logan but if we need to call him up for some games then we can have decent faith in Logan filling a role. If not, well that is the nature of AFL. I'll be elated if he finds himself back in the side with rewards such as our 2nd AFL flag at the end but I'll be just as elated if Logan helps us win our 37th sanfl flag too.
Not forgotten has been emergency at least one and I think a couple of times. He was dropped for good reason last year but has played super-well in his last few games.... gotta say that little jakey neade is a bit of a forgotten player .....
Have started watching the Ch7 replay, hats off to the production values. Good camera work, very good commentary.
No it is being negative. We know Logan is not a first 22 player and is a depth player but after 8 rounds people are calling for him to be delisted just because somebody mentioned he is playing well enough for a possible call up to the AFL side. There's lots of football left in the season.I don't think it's negativity, or personal. It's merely a rational view of the depth chart combined with, for want of a kinder term, spud fatigue.
QUOTE]
No it is being negative. We know Logan is not a first 22 player and is a depth player but after 8 rounds people are calling for him to be delisted just because somebody mentioned he is playing well enough for a possible call up to the AFL side. There's lots of football left in the season.