SANFL Tribunal Results

(Log in to remove this ad.)

U-DOG

Debutant
Joined
May 9, 2003
Posts
98
Likes
0
Location
Adelaide
Other Teams
Centrals
#5
Would've been ridiculous if Gowans got suspended - absolutely nothing in it. Tuck was a tad lucky but considering he apologised to Quinno on the day, a reprimand was probably sensible. I'm just glad that neither player was suspended - there's nothing worse than missing finals that way.
 

eddie eagle

All Australian
Joined
Apr 23, 2001
Posts
699
Likes
39
Location
APPLF HQ
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
SANFL Eagles, Colts, Crystal Palace
Thread starter #6
Originally posted by bulldog pommy
And so they should.
What did the umpire get for being a ****
Did not see either incident - but both reported players pleaded guilty to the charges, so not sure where you are coming from. The players themselves did not dispute the reports.

They were reprimanded after their guilty pleas were accepted.
 

Rorys458

Premium Platinum
Joined
Apr 20, 2001
Posts
25,826
Likes
8,768
Location
Adelaide Oval / Anfield
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Adelaide Utd,Liverpool, WWT Eagles.
#7
Reprimands make no sense whatsoever

Its like the first one is free.

Do it again and you will only get a week and so there is no punishement

They should have at least got suspended sentences one would have thought.

Every player in the SANFL pretty much knows they can whack someone and get away with it if they plead guilty and have a clean record.

Parry must have almost killed Coulter to get five weeks.
 
Joined
Mar 16, 2001
Posts
1,976
Likes
2
Location
Snout's Bar, Glenelg Oval
Other Teams
GLENELG
#9
Originally posted by Jars458
Every player in the SANFL pretty much knows they can whack someone and get away with it if they plead guilty and have a clean record.
... or they can whinge that the umpire was giving them a hard time, and have their club stand over the umpire by bringing charges against him. This will result in the dropping of all charges after a mutual hand-job session behind closed doors. :mad:
 
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Posts
1,061
Likes
24
Location
Adelaide
AFL Club
Carlton
Other Teams
Centrals / Southampton
#10
Originally posted by eddie eagle
Did not see either incident - but both reported players pleaded guilty to the charges, so not sure where you are coming from. The players themselves did not dispute the reports.

They were reprimanded after their guilty pleas were accepted.
Of course the players are going to plead guilty, its the sensible thing to do.
The strike that Gowans did was nothing more than swishing a fly away and Tuck's was a change in direction and a loss of balance.
 

eddie eagle

All Australian
Joined
Apr 23, 2001
Posts
699
Likes
39
Location
APPLF HQ
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
SANFL Eagles, Colts, Crystal Palace
Thread starter #11
Originally posted by Uncle Steve
... or they can whinge that the umpire was giving them a hard time, and have their club stand over the umpire by bringing charges against him. This will result in the dropping of all charges after a mutual hand-job session behind closed doors. :mad:
yes let's hope that the foul mouthed player cannot be talked into continuing his career at the club.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

eddie eagle

All Australian
Joined
Apr 23, 2001
Posts
699
Likes
39
Location
APPLF HQ
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
SANFL Eagles, Colts, Crystal Palace
Thread starter #12
Originally posted by bulldog pommy
Tuck's was a change in direction and a loss of balance.
OK but was the result of the tuck trip the injury to graham's knee. A fletcher special?. A dogs fan at work is ****faced that he may miss the GF.
 
Top Bottom