SC Trading Thread (Part I)

[Pout]

Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010

I Posted before but someone said it was hard to read so i made it a bit better... really need some help i dont know where to start, which trades should i do i am thinking getting barlow or ROK?

Defenders


Goddard, B Enright, C Gilbee, L Hodge, L Kennelly, T


Hunt, J Sheppard, B Davis, P Carlisle, J



Midfield


Ablett, G Selwood, J Pendlebury, S Martin, D Trengove, J
Scully, T Bastinac, R



Cunnington, B




Rucks


Sandilands, A Tippett, K Warnock, R Lobbe, M




Forwards


Riewoldt, N Brown, J Higgins, S Dangerfield, P Ziebell, J


Franklin, L Rohan, G Daw, M Tapscott, L​

I have 2 players on the field who have not scored (Rohan, G and Sheppard, B) i also have Trengove and tippet... I know if i was able to replace these with decent players i could be getting a great score (got in the 2000's with 2 non scoring players and tippet) so what should i do??

I kinda stink at super coach and just wanna do alright in the work league...cheer fellas

Scully>Barlow This is a must.
Sheppard>Waters Also a must.
You probably have to make two trades next week as well, they should help greatly though.

 

[Hot Tiges]

Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010

1.Barlow for who do ya reckon? Trengove?

2.Who is Sheppard Davis?

3. I think i am gunna tippett for seaby

1. Piss Cunnington off.
2. Definately keep Sheppard Davis!!
3. Good, least you have him in the ruck, unlike me.

 

[russea]

Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010

I Posted before but someone said it was hard to read so i made it a bit better... really need some help i dont know where to start, which trades should i do i am thinking getting barlow or ROK? ​

Defenders​

Goddard, B Enright, C Gilbee, L Hodge, L Kennelly, T​

Hunt, J Sheppard, B Davis, P Carlisle, J​

Midfield​

Ablett, G Selwood, J Pendlebury, S Martin, D Trengove, J
Scully, T Bastinac, R​

Cunnington, B​

Rucks​

Sandilands, A Tippett, K Warnock, R Lobbe, M​

Forwards​

Riewoldt, N Brown, J Higgins, S Dangerfield, P Ziebell, J​

Franklin, L Rohan, G Daw, M Tapscott, L​

I have 2 players on the field who have not scored (Rohan, G and Sheppard, B) i also have Trengove and tippet... I know if i was able to replace these with decent players i could be getting a great score (got in the 2000's with 2 non scoring players and tippet) so what should i do??

I kinda stink at super coach and just wanna do alright in the work league...cheer fellas

trade out cunnington for barlow
then any of ur last 3 defenders for waters/maguire
try carslie>Maguire carslie aint getting a game anytime soon

 

[Spartans FC]

Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010

I'd leave Hurn on the bench providing you have sufficient cover.

Anyone have ideas on what to do with Masten?? Keep and give him another chance?? or offload for someone cheaper? If I bring in Danger for Tips it would yield me 464k

Could trade him for Dangerfield but whether or not he can keep up his average I'm unsure of. That is IMO pretty much trading sideways not really helping you progress your team because Masten is a good player. Travis Johnstone (BRIS) is going pretty well atm too and could be good value at 390K, averaging 103. David Mackay (ADEL) is another player to look at i think, 415800 and averaging 93. Good player that bloke.

 

[thomas_m18]

Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010

Can anyone talk me out of making these trades?

Ball > Cooney

Hall > Murphy


Pissed off that both Coondog and Bobby Murphy where in my side over the preseason and wasting two trades early, but the way i see it these two will only improve my side, both can be keepers and have higher scoring potential that the former two.

Don't think you should be trading Hall out just yet, because it'll be a Rocky (because of the punching, yeah? no?...) ride. Bobby Murphy COULD get injured again.

Ball on the other hand pissed me off bad this week, and I want to trade him too. If you keep Hall, you can go for Boak (go for Boak, go for broke? yeah? no, again?...) or you can put up with Ball's crap.

 

[Hot Tiges]

Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010

Could trade him for Dangerfield but whether or not he can keep up his average I'm unsure of. That is IMO pretty much trading sideways not really helping you progress your team because Masten is a good player. Travis Johnstone (BRIS) is going pretty well atm too and could be good value at 390K, averaging 103. David Mackay (ADEL) is another player to look at i think, 415800 and averaging 93. Good player that bloke.

Yeah, I'm looking at Tippett > Dangerfield so that rules out that option. Travis Johnstone? Yuck in my opinion. Will get dropped this year sometime. Had in 08 (my first year) and annoyed me then. Dave Mackay, had him as a smoky option in one of my later squads. Really should of gone with the hunch! Oh well. May end up backing Masten.

Is Hille > Seaby too sideways. Not sure if it's worth jumping on.

 

[Spartans FC]

Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010

Can anyone talk me out of making these trades?

Ball > Cooney

Hall > Murphy


Pissed off that both Coondog and Bobby Murphy where in my side over the preseason and wasting two trades early, but the way i see it these two will only improve my side, both can be keepers and have higher scoring potential that the former two.

I'll give it a crack. Murphy is a good player, that much is true, however he is also injury prone. What is you bench like in your forward line? I'm hoping good because you will be needing it if you put him in your team. Hall will improve over time and although Murphy has looked good he may get injured again which not only means you wasted a trade but also are having someone coming in scoring poor scores instead of him.
There aint no talking the ball to cooney trade, ball is a hack (who i'm spewing i have) and cooney is a gun.

 

[Impromptu]

Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010

I Posted before but someone said it was hard to read so i made it a bit better... really need some help i dont know where to start, which trades should i do i am thinking getting barlow or ROK? ​

.................

​

​

My advice is use this format:

B - B1,B2,B3,B4,B5,B6,B7 [B8,B9]
M - M1(c),M2,M3 etc etc

It's just easier to read and also when people reply to your question, it's easier to refer to players..

Didn't look at your team, but just looked at your question and yes, you really need to get Barlow...

 

[russea]

Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010

you can go for Boak (go for Boak, go for broke? yeah? no, again?...) or you can put up with Ball's crap.

LOL tom do sit at home all day and come up with these... gotta give to ya ur trying

 

[LiverpoolRed]

Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010

They should avg. fairly similarly by the end of the year. Sydney games have more stoppages so Seaby has plenty of opportunities for stats, whereas Kreuzer is better around the ground.

Well said amn thats why I jumped on him, he is virtually a keeper, say syd win 12 games he could avg around 100-105. Thats why Jolly is strugling so much, because of the high inter changes, les game time and less stopages, were as Seaby is now flourishing with heaps of hit outs to very good rovers in kirk, RO'k goodes and co. Should be 1 of the burgin buys of the year.

 

[thomas_m18]

Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010

LOL tom do sit at home all day and come up with these... gotta give to ya ur trying

I actually thought of it on the spot. Pretty good, I know.

 

[Spartans FC]

Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010

Yeah, I'm looking at Tippett > Dangerfield so that rules out that option. Travis Johnstone? Yuck in my opinion. Will get dropped this year sometime. Had in 08 (my first year) and annoyed me then. Dave Mackay, had him as a smoky option in one of my later squads. Really should of gone with the hunch! Oh well. May end up backing Masten.

Is Hille > Seaby too sideways. Not sure if it's worth jumping on.

I'm also looking at Tippett to Dangerfield but not sure yet if im going to do it. Definitely risky but could pay off, could backfire if Tippet kills Melb this week. I don't think Hille > Seaby is sideways, Seaby is playing a lot better and his price will increase. Could potentially trade him for Cox or Mitch Clarke later on.

 

[Impromptu]

Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010

Can anyone talk me out of making these trades?

Ball > Cooney
Hall > Murphy

Pissed off that both Coondog and Bobby Murphy where in my side over the preseason and wasting two trades early, but the way i see it these two will only improve my side, both can be keepers and have higher scoring potential that the former two.

The question you must ask yourself is whether your mistakes (of not following your instincts) should affect your trades....You need to assess it like this...if Cooney and Murphy didn't play round 1 and 2 (like judd) would you jump on Cooney and Murphy..

If yes, then by all means...if you are doing the trade cause you are p1ssed off that you didn't stick to your initial plan...then maybe not..

DON'T INCLUDE SUNK COSTS... It's like me if I picked Shaw (over Newman) and Franklin (over Harvey), I'd be in a better position, so I ask myself ignoring 'what if', do I think it's a value trade? If yes then I'll do it.. but i said how many points can Franklin gain over Harvey and Shaw gain over Newman and is it worth 2 trades..I said no...so don't include sunk points or what ifs in your decision making...geez I should have studied to be a psychologist..LOL

But for me, I don't mind Ball to Cooney, but Hall to Murphy I'm not sure..

 

[bigbook]

Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010

Cunnington>Barlow
Sheppard>Waters

Yes or no? BTW my team is on the previous page

 

[Spartans FC]

Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010

1. Piss Cunnington off.
2. Definately keep Sheppard Davis!!
3. Good, least you have him in the ruck, unlike me.

I disagree, Cunnington will do well when he comes in and there has been talk that it could be this week. Davis will not be a huge cash cow as he isnt a player that will consistantly score 70 - 80 +. Sheppard could score well but he fractured his cheek bone a few weeks ago and will probably come back via the WAFL.

 

[Spudregus_87]

Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010

Cunnington>Barlow
Sheppard>Waters

Yes or no? BTW my team is on the previous page

If it were me, I'd do it.


Ok, LiverpoolRed has convinced me that Mitch Clark has to go. So, I'm thinking about one of two trade options.

Option 1:
Clark > Sandilands (giving me Sandi & Hille)

or

Option 2:
Clark > Seaby
Hall > Brown/O'Keefe

Which option, and if option 2, which forward? (I'm thinking ROK)

 

[LiverpoolRed]

Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010

If it were me, I'd do it.


Ok, LiverpoolRed has convinced me that Mitch Clark has to go. So, I'm thinking about one of two trade options.

Option 1:
Clark > Sandilands (giving me Sandi & Hille)

or

Option 2:
Clark > Seaby
Hall > Brown/O'Keefe

Which option, and if option 2, which forward? (I'm thinking ROK)

Haha I would Go Clark to Seaby and Hall to brown.

Because:
-'Sydney games have more stoppages so Seaby has plenty of opportunities for stats... Thats why Jolly is strugling so much, because of the high inter changes, less game time and less stopages'. Can easly average 100+ at a team like syd with high stopages, he is a classy footballer for a big man and half the price of sandi.

- I fell like Hall is being used as a decoy, they kicked the ball to him all nab cup to get fear into the other teams, they play 2 defenders on him and have Hahn or Higgins or Murphy run free and score goals.

- Brown looks fitter then ever befor, his hand is fixed and no strapping on his knees or shoulders. Should score 40-50 point more than hall.

 

[bigbook]

Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010

Ok i have just traded Barlow for cunnington however dont know what to do with B Sheppard...Should i get Maguire or waters?

Waters is 40k more and they are averaging about the same what do yas think?

 

[Yoda_]

Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010

Traded out M.Williams for Peterson, then used the extra cash to upgrade Boomer to J.Brown.

What do people think??

Am thinking that Petersons price is expected to rise to about 200,000 and I will still have extra cash from the downgrade. So I could pick up Boomer on the cheap or even Rioli perhaps.

 

[LiverpoolRed]

Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010

Ok i have just traded Barlow for cunnington however dont know what to do with B Sheppard...Should i get Maguire or waters?

Waters is 40k more and they are averaging about the same what do yas think?

If you feel like burning trades in sidways bets, go for Waters, he is a proven 95pts avg over a full season were as goose tends to get injured with his hard nut approach.

 

[bigbook]

Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010

What do you mean sideways bets?

 

[_Hammer_]

Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010

What do you mean sideways bets?

Sideways - similar for similar without any real gain.

Eg: Rookie for Rookie
Eg: Gun for Gun

It's two rounds in. Swapping a low scorer for someone equally as priced who has scored well is very very risky. We all know how quickly luck can change in football.

Reading your earlier post, you are talking about Sheppard.... with a possible trade to MaGuire.

I was under the impression Sheppard is returning from a jaw injury or similar and has played a reserves game? Why not keep him on the bench. He'll get a game.

If he's on the LTI list, then fair enough.

 

[Purrfect Pussies]

Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010

If it were me, I'd do it.


Ok, LiverpoolRed has convinced me that Mitch Clark has to go. So, I'm thinking about one of two trade options.

Option 1:
Clark > Sandilands (giving me Sandi & Hille)

or

Option 2:
Clark > Seaby
Hall > Brown/O'Keefe

Which option, and if option 2, which forward? (I'm thinking ROK)

As much as l you'd like to have Brown Dog or ROK in your side would a ruck combo of Seaby and Hille do the job? It looks awful on paper and Sandilands is an SC elite ruckman.

 

[Bomber4ever]

Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010

As much as l you'd like to have Brown Dog or ROK in your side would a ruck combo of Seaby and Hille do the job? It looks awful on paper and Sandilands is an SC elite ruckman.

But do you think a weak ruck division is alright if your using the money elsewhere? This year good rucks seem few and far between, where as in the forward line there's lots of good options. Just wondering if there is any disadvantage in having a weak ruck division if you spend the money to strenghthen your forward line?

I'll use spud_jjj's trades as an example:

Clark --> Sandilands
or
Clark --> Seaby
Hall --> Brown/ROK

So effctively it's Sandi and Hall in option 1 (as Hall wouldn't be traded out) Vs Seaby and Brown/ROK in option 2. If you compare the player in both options it looks like this:

Sandi v Brown/ROK - Very close i'd probably take the latter
Hall v Seaby - Take Seaby, although I excpect Hall to pick up

So i'm thinking that whilst trading in Seaby makes your rucks look weak on paper, maybe this is countered by a stronger forward line. I guess the downside of this is that if Seaby's performance drops later on in the year you might need to use another trade. Am I making any sense?

 

[esorhali]

Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010

But do you think a weak ruck division is alright if your using the money elsewhere? This year good rucks seem few and far between, where as in the forward line there's lots of good options. Just wondering if there is any disadvantage in having a weak ruck division if you spend the money to strenghthen your forward line?

I'll use spud_jjj's trades as an example:

Clark --> Sandilands
or
Clark --> Seaby
Hall --> Brown/ROK

So effctively it's Sandi and Hall in option 1 (as Hall wouldn't be traded out) Vs Seaby and Brown/ROK in option 2. If you compare the player in both options it looks like this:

Sandi v Brown/ROK - Very close i'd probably take the latter
Hall v Seaby - Take Seaby, although I excpect Hall to pick up

So i'm thinking that whilst trading in Seaby makes your rucks look weak on paper, maybe this is countered by a stronger forward line. I guess the downside of this is that if Seaby's performance drops later on in the year you might need to use another trade. Am I making any sense?

Yeah well said...I am in the same predicament. I have Clark and Nic Nat currently as my rucks with Tippett in fwd line as mpp.

Not happy with Clark or Tippett.
Do you think Seaby will average the same as Clark throughout the year????
Do not want to really burn any trades but was thinking that if Clark and Seaby were too average similiar scores for the year then trading Clark out now for Seaby to pocket approx. $200K+ would allow me to upgrade some else in a few weeks time. eg. maybe Tippett if he continues to maybe a struggle of even a rookie like Martin to Judd. I would only be using one trade for now but it that a sideways trade? Or should I just sit tight and hope Clark and Tippett come good. Bearing in mind their price will plummet this week. I just like the idea of an extra $200+ in the bank to upgrade over the next few rounds.

Any thought??